RE: [DISCUSS] Config Drive: Using the OpenStack format?

2017-05-20 Thread Simon Weller
Yes, I don't see any point in reinventing the wheel. Simon Weller/615-312-6068 -Original Message- From: Wido den Hollander [w...@widodh.nl] Received: Saturday, 20 May 2017, 8:45AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org [dev@cloudstack.apache.org] Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Config Drive: Using the

Re: Extend CloudStack for a new hypervisor

2017-05-20 Thread Funs Kessen
Been a while since I looked at this stuff. It might be worth it to look at the VSphere implementation as that does something similar to what you're trying to achieve and what Rafael mentions. In effect you could view CloudStack as the federation of multiple VSphere endpoints, in your case one or

Re: [DISCUSS] Config Drive: Using the OpenStack format?

2017-05-20 Thread Wido den Hollander
Just to check all the +1's, they are about using the OpenStack format. Right? Config Drive will be there no matter what. Wido > Op 19 mei 2017 om 19:45 heeft Kris Sterckx > het volgende geschreven: > > FYI > > Slides are here : >