Re: next major release

I made the pom changes on master to 4.11.0.0-SNAPSHOT 4.10 branch is created master and 4.10 can now accept changes once the upgrade paths are in place. Release notes and release announcement are the pending items now. Thanks, ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On July 12, 2017 at

Re: Usage Server in Docker Simulator

Are you running the usage server? It is a different service and run independently of the mgmt server -- Erik ons. 12. jul. 2017 kl. 00.25 skrev John McDonnell : > Hi, > > I asked this back in April on the Users mailing list and the response > I got was that the usage server should be on by def

Re: [4.10] repos

Monsieur, The job should be altered to go into 4.11. lemme look. On 12/07/17 02:06, "Pierre-Luc Dion" wrote: Hi, I've created new jenkins jobs [1] to create package for our release, The jobs pushed rpm's but for systemvm, look like there is a wget job somewhere that downloa

[4.10] repos

Hi, I've created new jenkins jobs [1] to create package for our release, The jobs pushed rpm's but for systemvm, look like there is a wget job somewhere that download systemvm template from jenkins from build of master branch, I've created a set of systemvm templates that I would like to published

Re: Developer Guide - Current Setup Guide?

Thanks Will, looks good. My searching brought up many older guides, one was Ian Duffys blog. These look a better base to start from. AH > On 11 Jul 2017, at 22:06, Will Stevens wrote: > > So this is the guide I always used to follow. I think it is very outdated > as well: > https://cwiki.apa

Usage Server in Docker Simulator

Hi, I asked this back in April on the Users mailing list and the response I got was that the usage server should be on by default in the docker container. I got sidetracked by other things and am coming back to this issue. Is it meant to be running by default? or is there something needed to do

Re: Developer Guide - Current Setup Guide?

So this is the guide I always used to follow. I think it is very outdated as well: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/How+to+build+CloudStack I feel like both of these guides are pretty limited because it does not cover an integration with any hypervisor, so you may be able to

RE: [NOTICE] Meeting with Accelerite Leadership

> Op 11 juli 2017 om 15:06 schreef Giles Sirett : > > > Ilya, all > Good initiative- thanks to you & John for taking the lead on it and > thanks to the Accelrite folks for some of the offers that theyr'e making here > Indeed! Sounds very good. > > Only a couple questions from me: the c

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

Hi, I would suggest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2131 Serious issue with Ubuntu 16.04 and statistics gathering on KVM. Wido > Op 11 juli 2017 om 11:49 schreef Rohit Yadav : > > > Hi Sean, > > > Thanks for sharing. > > > - Rohit > > > From: S

Re: next major release

I would say 4.11 5.0 should have major changes (like mentioned), API changes or other big things. It should have 'killer features'. New GUI, New API, etc. That kind of things. Wido > Op 10 juli 2017 om 7:09 schreef Rajani Karuturi : > > > should it be 4.11.0.0 or 5.0.0.0? > > ~Rajani > http

Re: [DISCUSS] upgrade to 4.11

of which the heart is full, the mouth spilled ... (free from ancient dutch saying ;) On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > Oh ok. DB upgrade, not a new skeleton for the upgrade path between version > (hypervisors, etc...). > > My bad. :) > > *Will Stevens* > CTO > >

Re: [DISCUSS] upgrade to 4.11

Oh ok. DB upgrade, not a new skeleton for the upgrade path between version (hypervisors, etc...). My bad. :) *Will Stevens* CTO On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > No I am creating the upgrade code for the next version. > (schema-41000to41100 and

Re: [DISCUSS] upgrade to 4.11

No I am creating the upgrade code for the next version. (schema-41000to41100 and upgrade java class) On 11/07/17 15:29, "williamstev...@gmail.com on behalf of Will Stevens" wrote: Not sure I have an answer for that. Are you creating a PR to this set of documentation or where are you w

Re: [DISCUSS] upgrade to 4.11

Not sure I have an answer for that. Are you creating a PR to this set of documentation or where are you working? https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/tree/master/source/upgrade *Will Stevens* CTO On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Devs, > >

[DISCUSS] upgrade to 4.11

Devs, I am busy creating the skeleton upgrade code for our next version (working name 4.11). Are we still supporting all direct upgrades from 2.x onward or should we only assume upgrade paths from 4.y onwards? Tnx, daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden,

RE: [NOTICE] Meeting with Accelerite Leadership

Ilya, all Good initiative- thanks to you & John for taking the lead on it and thanks to the Accelrite folks for some of the offers that theyr'e making here Only a couple questions from me: the concept of the proposed call sounds like a general effort/alignment thing - almost like a project

Re: [DISCUSS] drop support for CentOS6 with 4.10

Can you link the appropriate config files so we can review the configuration? Thanks... On Jul 11, 2017 8:05 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: Will, I'll be on holidays next week and have tight schedules this month. I'll ping Paul if he has bandwidth to contribute them. - Rohit

Re: [DISCUSS] drop support for CentOS6 with 4.10

Will, I'll be on holidays next week and have tight schedules this month. I'll ping Paul if he has bandwidth to contribute them. - Rohit From: Will Stevens Sent: 11 July 2017 16:41:41 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] drop support for CentOS6

Travis failing on PRs

All, Please see: https://blog.travis-ci.com/2017-06-19-trusty-updates-2017-Q2 OracleJDK7 is no longer supported by Travis, switching to oraclejdk7 yields error. Please help review and merge before 4.10 branch is cut and master is

Re: [DISCUSS] drop support for CentOS6 with 4.10

Pierre-Luc is asking because he has been the only person contributing to the upgrade documentation released with the new releases since around 4.4. Rohit, would you be able to contribute an upgrade path for CentOS6 installations in the documentation for the 4.10 release? On Jul 11, 2017 5:59 AM,

Re: [DISCUSS] drop support for CentOS6 with 4.10

PL - yes Trillian has tested with CentOS6 + JDK8 with 4.10.0.0/master+. JRE/JDK8 are available in additional repositories on CentOS6 so at least for 4.10.0.0 (already votes, to be announced) we cannot deprecate it. However, we can discuss that for 4.11.0.0 and onwards. However, I think unless we

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

Hi Sean, Thanks for sharing. - Rohit From: Sean Lair Sent: 11 July 2017 03:41:17 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS) Here are three issues we ran into in 4.9.2.0. We have been running

Re:Re: next major release

Agree, unless we bring in architecture changes and/or significant improvments, we should still stay on the 4.1x Personally, i think these features may make ACS really qualified to 5.0 - VR enhancement, e.g. Vyos - API 2.0 - Fully redundant VPC ( it's broken in current version) - Redesigned