Re: Strange size of template from snapshot on XenServer

Hi Lotic, Can you try with any release between 4.6 to 4.8 and see if this bug is there? Basically, any release which contains commit 2c4ea503f92bcf9c611f409d5cdecb42b0115b69 and missing commit 8a3fd10. On 02/11/17, 1:14 AM, "Lotic Lists" wrote: Rafael, I know and

RE: Strange size of template from snapshot on XenServer

Rafael, I know and appreciate your help :) I recognize all effort of CloudStack community. I think all admins use snapshot to backup your virtual disks, I think it is not a isolated problem. Imagine a crash on your storage and you need convert your snapshots to templates. Thanks Marcelo

Re: Strange size of template from snapshot on XenServer

Well, I could not reproduce the problem in ACS 4.9.2.0. So, before fixing anything, the person that might take on this should first find the root of the problem. I understand what you are saying that it is a critical problem, but you have to understand that this is an open-source and free

RE: Strange size of template from snapshot on XenServer

Hi Rafael Tested on ACS 4.5.2.2, 4.9.2.0, 4.9.3.0 and 4.10. All versions with same issue Description and steps to reproduce https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10128 Again, it is a critical problem for production environments. Regards Marcelo -Original Message- From:

Re: 4.9 / 4.10 KVM + openvswitch + vpc + static nat / secondary ip on eth2?

Hi Sven, Frank, We hit this issue too last year in our CloudStack fork, and this is how we resolved it: https://github.com/MissionCriticalCloudOldRepos/cosmic-plugin-hypervisor-kvm/pull/14 Shouldn’t be too hard to port to current CloudStack, but I have no time to do it and test it. We have

AW: 4.9 / 4.10 KVM + openvswitch + vpc + static nat / secondary ip on eth2?

Hi Frank, i filed a bug report. I hope anybody can fix that fastly. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10127 Greetings Sven -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Vogel, Sven [mailto:sven.vo...@kupper-computer.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. November 2017 00:14 An:

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to embedded Jetty and fatjar CloudStack

All, The PR has received enough reviews and (regression) testings to consider it for merging. I'll keep the PR open for few days to receive further reviews and additional testing. Thanks. Regards. From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Monday,