Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

Hi Paul, Migration script considers only what’s in the command.properties file, so if the ‘missing’ quotaIsEnabled=15 is not there it will not create a rule for it. As Rohit mentioned it’s a duty of the admin to take care of aligning this up. I’m also not big fan of having this described in

Re: [4.11] KVM Advanced Networking with SG Problem

On 01/22/2018 07:35 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: On 01/21/2018 11:23 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Wido - Were you able to reproduce and fix the issue? Thanks. Still working on it! This weekend I was short on time and wasn't able to fix it yet. Today (Mon) and tomorrow (Tue) my time is

Re: [4.11] KVM Advanced Networking with SG Problem

On 01/21/2018 11:23 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Wido - Were you able to reproduce and fix the issue? Thanks. Still working on it! This weekend I was short on time and wasn't able to fix it yet. Today (Mon) and tomorrow (Tue) my time is limited as well. Trying to fix it asap. Wido -

Re: [4.11] KVM Advanced Networking with SG Problem

Wido - Were you able to reproduce and fix the issue? Thanks. - Rohit From: Wido den Hollander Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 10:12:45 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [4.11] KVM Advanced

Re: [GitHub] rafaelweingartner commented on a change in pull request #2416: CLOUDSTACK-10244: KVM online storage migration fails

Thanks for the discussion, I'll prefer keeping the current code as well. Merging this based on code reviews and tests. - Rohit From: Rafael Weingärtner Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2018 11:29:38

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

Hi everyone, I’ve completed running the automated (and, in some cases, manual) tests for managed storage against RC1. With the exception of one critical issue, all of the tests for all tested hypervisors (XenServer, VMware, and KVM) passed. With regards to the critical issue, I have opened a