Re: Working with a 'PendingReleaseNotes' file

2018-06-19 Thread Rafael Weingärtner
It seems so. It can then be a part of the PR. I mean, in the PR we could require a commit that updates this file. Of course, we need to discuss if all PRs should update it, or only important things should go in. +1 On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 11:00 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > Hi, > > At the

Re: [DISCUSS] Blocking the creation of new Basic Networking zones

2018-06-19 Thread Rafael Weingärtner
+1 I would love to. But I'm a real novice when it comes to the UI though. So that would be something I wouldn't be good at doing. We all can help you with the UI. It is a little complicated at the beginning because it is a JavaScript that generates HTML code. However, it is doable. On Wed,

Re: [DISCUSS] Blocking the creation of new Basic Networking zones

2018-06-19 Thread Tutkowski, Mike
If this initiative goes through, perhaps that’s a good time to bump CloudStack’s release number to 5.0.0? > On Jun 19, 2018, at 3:17 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > > >> On 06/19/2018 11:07 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: >> I like this initiative, and here comes the big but even though I myself

Re: [DISCUSS] Blocking the creation of new Basic Networking zones

2018-06-19 Thread Wido den Hollander
On 06/19/2018 11:07 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > I like this initiative, and here comes the big but even though I myself > might think it is not valid; Basic zones are there to give a simple start > for new users. If we can give a one-knob start/one page wizard for creating > a shared network in

Re: Convert KVM Instance to CloudStack

2018-06-19 Thread Wido den Hollander
On 06/14/2018 01:32 AM, ilya musayev wrote: > Hi Users and Dev > > I apologize for cross posting.. > > I have bunch of VMs that were deployed by CloudStack - however - the > management server along with a DB is no longer available. > > This is a POC environment - but i would love not to

Re: [DISCUSS] Blocking the creation of new Basic Networking zones

2018-06-19 Thread Daan Hoogland
I like this initiative, and here comes the big but even though I myself might think it is not valid; Basic zones are there to give a simple start for new users. If we can give a one-knob start/one page wizard for creating a shared network in advanced zone with security groups and userdata, great.

Working with a 'PendingReleaseNotes' file

2018-06-19 Thread Wido den Hollander
Hi, At the Ceph project we work with a Pending Release Notes [0]. The idea is that if a developer writes a new feature or fixes something that changes functionality (or adds one) she/he also updates the PendingReleaseNotes file. That way when a new version is released it's easier for the

[DISCUSS] Blocking the creation of new Basic Networking zones

2018-06-19 Thread Wido den Hollander
Hi, We (PCextreme) are a big-time user of Basic Networking and recently started to look into Advanced Networking with VLAN isolation and a shared network. This provides (from what we can see) all the features Basic Networking provides, like the VR just doing DHCP and UserData while the

Re: PR 2670: Removing an old, unused NetApp plug-in

2018-06-19 Thread Tutkowski, Mike
Just an FYI that I merged this PR into master today. https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2670 On 5/24/18, 1:41 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: +1 on removal of unused plugin including removal of related files, db tables and any global settings. - Rohit

RE: Cloudstack 4.11 - Ubuntu 16.04 Agent UFW firewall issues

2018-06-19 Thread Glen Baars
Hello Dag, Sorry for the delay. Advanced zone public - cloudbr1 guest public - cloudbr1 management - cloudbr0 storage - cloudbr2 Each cloudbr is a linux bond with two network cards. Here is the cloudbr1 bonding config. # The primary network interface auto enp4s0f2 iface enp4s0f2 inet manual