[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] utchoang opened a new pull request #861: FIX - Detail setting tab interface

2020-11-16 Thread GitBox
utchoang opened a new pull request #861: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/861 @rhtyd cc @svenvogel - Before ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/13766648/99347924-d95a2300-28ca-11eb-9f96-2a17b7cb1a20.png) - After: ![image](https://user-i

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] slavkap commented on issue #836: [BASIC NETWORK TESTING]

2020-11-16 Thread GitBox
slavkap commented on issue #836: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/836#issuecomment-728175536 @PaulAngus the problem still appears on master. In my previous comment the API calls are copied from dev tools. Also in the new UI I didn't provide rootdisksize because the

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] PaulAngus commented on issue #836: [BASIC NETWORK TESTING]

2020-11-16 Thread GitBox
PaulAngus commented on issue #836: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/836#issuecomment-728169120 @davidjumani could you have a look at the extra **_networkid_**, and **_affinitygroupids_**, and _**mac**_ and _**rootdisksize**_ which are being sent when they haven't b

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] PaulAngus commented on issue #836: [BASIC NETWORK TESTING]

2020-11-16 Thread GitBox
PaulAngus commented on issue #836: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/836#issuecomment-728161383 @slavkap when you deployed the VM in the new UI, did you set the rootdisksize to 8 or has the new UI added it itself? + I can only see pain by the UI sending a blan

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] PaulAngus removed a comment on issue #836: [BASIC NETWORK TESTING]

2020-11-16 Thread GitBox
PaulAngus removed a comment on issue #836: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/836#issuecomment-728157738 @slavkap Thank you for your help. Could you test the VM deployment against the master branch please. The new UI will only go GA against 4.15. I suspect that you

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] PaulAngus commented on issue #836: [BASIC NETWORK TESTING]

2020-11-16 Thread GitBox
PaulAngus commented on issue #836: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/836#issuecomment-728157738 @slavkap Thank you for your help. Could you test the VM deployment against the master branch please. The new UI will only go GA against 4.15. I suspect that you'll get

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] PaulAngus commented on issue #836: [BASIC NETWORK TESTING]

2020-11-16 Thread GitBox
PaulAngus commented on issue #836: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/836#issuecomment-728154539 @andrijapanicsb @DaanHoogland the new UI is only GA with 4.15. Functions may or may not work with pre-GA versions, but they that's not something we should concern ourse

Re: [DISCUSS] python test framework

2020-11-16 Thread Pierre-Luc Dion
It would be interesting if we could come up with a catalogue of api tests, as serverspec [1] did for infrastructure tests. if we would have some kind of library of tests, then the only things we would define in our tests suite would be the order of unit tests and pretty much no code. I don't kno

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] andrijapanicsb commented on issue #836: [BASIC NETWORK TESTING]

2020-11-16 Thread GitBox
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #836: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/836#issuecomment-727939427 cc @nvazquez as I think he could advise about that one ^^^ This is an automated message from the Apa

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] DaanHoogland commented on issue #836: [BASIC NETWORK TESTING]

2020-11-16 Thread GitBox
DaanHoogland commented on issue #836: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/836#issuecomment-727938779 @GabrielBrascher @wido @weizhouapache I tried to test https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4158 but got stopped in my tracks because of below issue, not sure if

AW: [DISCUSS] python test framework

2020-11-16 Thread peter.muryshkin
Hi there Dan, we work to setup the test environment and will share relevant output fragments with the limitation we can't share complete logs publicly. kind regards Peter Von: Daan Hoogland Gesendet: Montag, 16. November 2020 11:12:55 An: dev Betreff: Re

Re: [DISCUSS] python test framework

2020-11-16 Thread Daan Hoogland
sounds like I am on my own. Any body cares to chime in? On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 10:21 PM Nicolas Vazquez < nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > LGTM > > > Regards, > > Nicolas Vazquez > > > From: Daan Hoogland > Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2020 1:05 PM > To: