Daan,
Good to hear from you! Hope all is well.
Yes, we should talk, but I'm afraid my schedule is such that I cannot put a
meeting on the calendar until the new year.
We have looked at the Java refactoring work. I seems most of that work was
a true refactoring in that it didn't change the
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:50 AM, lsimons g...@git.apache.org wrote:
Github user lsimons commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/33#issuecomment-65199170
Hey folks,
Karl thanks for contributing. Looks like quite a bit of work!
Rohit thanks
Here is a update of the work in support of Cloudstack-764:
The overall idea of this effort is to implement VPC Virtual Redundant
Routing and automate the unit
tests for system virtual machine for virtual routers both redundant and
non-redundant, for Cloudstack-764.
Current work areas.
Modify
Daan,
Is it safe to assume that the most of the refactoring work mentioned
(pushed) in your email is outlined in CLOUDSTACK-7143?
Karl
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
H,
I just pushed a huge branch with work that my colleagues did [1]. It is
...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Hi Karl,
Karl Harris wrote:
What is the current framework used to test a Cloudstack Virtual Router
(SystemVM) in isolation aka without Management Server if any?
AFAIK we don't have any such testing/automation framework within Apache
CloudStack.
I'd like to call a SystemVM
Sorry for the duplicate questions!
Most were answered in you previous response!
Thanks Rohit!
On Tuesday, July 8, 2014, Karl Harris karl.har...@sungardas.com wrote:
How is the unit testing accomplished for changes to the
configuration/startup scripts? I can obviously run the scripts
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:04 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
Hi Karl,
Karl Harris wrote:
What is the current framework used to test a Cloudstack Virtual Router
(SystemVM) in isolation aka without Management Server if any?
AFAIK we don't have any such testing/automation
What is the current framework used to test a Cloudstack Virtual Router
(SystemVM) in isolation aka without Management Server if any?
I'd like to call a SystemVM script with a set of configuration parameters
(changes for VPCVrr, etc.) and observe the changes to the virtual routers
configuration.
the
transcript:
Attendance:
K3KH Karl Harris
Yasker Sheng Yang
Spark404 Hugo Trippaers
echaz Eric Chazas
LeoSimons Leo Simons
dahn Daan Hoogland
others where present in the room but not active in the meeting
Agenda:
- Feasibility experiment plans by Schuberg Philis
To: Sander Botman
Cc: Daan Hoogland; Karl Harris; dev; Alena Prokharchyk;
kis...@cloud.com; Christopher Litsinger; Hugo Trippaers; int-toolkit
Subject: Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs
BTW, do we have an agenda or some topics we want to discuss for the
meeting? I just want to make sure
20:00 utc ;-) missed the last change in time!
Karl
On Tuesday, June 10, 2014, Daan Hoogland dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com
wrote:
Karl, That’s midnight over here! :(
*\*DaanH
*From:* Karl Harris [mailto:karl.har...@sungardas.com
javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','karl.har
I will be happy to join!
On Saturday, June 7, 2014, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant
way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away from
it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to
console by setting the appropriate keys
similar to the console proxy.
I am asking the list if there are any other ways of testing this and
generating unit tests.
What was used in the past to test the system vm's?
Karl
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Karl Harris karl.har...@sungard.comwrote
, the optional private gateway network and the management
and possibly even the public interface.
maybe I was a little short on words describing this.
Daan
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Karl Harris karl.har...@sungardas.com
wrote:
Daan,
I appears your response was truncated.
Karl
not conflict but I think it makes sense to have a admin created
offering override the standard algorithm.
regards,
Daan
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Karl Harris karl.har...@sungardas.com
wrote:
The functional spec for Redundant Virtual Router for VPC's states:
Deployment for RvR
Daan,
I appears your response was truncated.
Karl
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.comwrote:
One answer inline...
mobile bilingual spell checker used
Op 24 apr. 2014 16:54 schreef Karl Harris karl.har...@sungardas.com:
A related question
using the above criteria?
Karl
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Karl Harris karl.har...@sungard.com wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18795
or not.
- daan Hoogland
On March 5, 2014, 8:20 p.m., Karl Harris wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18795
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18795/#review36352
---
On March 5, 2014, 8:20 p.m., Karl Harris wrote
---
None, yet still coding
Thanks,
Karl Harris
implementation would face the
same issues as well. You can take a look at current implementation and
follow the code flow, to see if it would help you.
--Sheng
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Karl Harris karl.har...@sungard.com
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Karl Harris karl.har
would be a appropriate design path.
Comments?
Karl
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Karl Harris karl.har...@sungard.com
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 3
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Karl Harris karl.har...@sungard.comwrote:
Would implementing a VPC Redundant Router Network Guru using the an
extension of the NetworkGuru interface be an appropriate way to create a
VPC network with redundant routers. It seems that extending Network Guru
any of our ships.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Karl Harris karl.har...@sungard.com wrote:
All,
At first redundant DHCP seemed like a good idea. I did some cursory
research and the more I read the more I'm convinced it may be
more trouble than its worth for the first implementation. I'll
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.comwrote:
On 03 Feb 2014, at 18:03, Karl Harris karl.har...@sungard.com wrote:
After discussion with my colleagues questions about initial
configuration of the open network redundant routers and the
applicability
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.comwrote:
On 03 Feb 2014, at 19:45, Karl Harris karl.har...@sungard.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 03 Feb 2014, at 18:03, Karl Harris karl.har...@sungard.com
the mention of
the
source nat router is in relation to that. I could be wrong though. It
appears that the other services like vpn, dhcp, dns do not benefit much
from the RVR capability. Can you clarify if thats correct?
Thanks
Saurav
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 2:27 AM, Karl Harris
of the changes functional will be inside the Java class:
VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl
Have I missed any critical differences?
Karl Harris
Cloud Software Engineer
Sungard Availability Systems
Listed below, lifted from the CloudStack Documentation, are the
characteristics of a VPC
, address people's
comment, and also would keep the people involved know what's going on.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Karl Harris karl.har...@sungard.com
wrote:
Comments/Critiques/Additions to this list as well as implementation
suggestions are requested.
After looking
Date: Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 4:07 PM
Subject: Re: rvr4vpc
To: Karl Harris karl.har...@sungard.com
Cc: Christopher Litsinger christopher.litsi...@sungard.com
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Karl Harris karl.har...@sungard.com
wrote:
I found a reference here which seems to imply only Source Nat
30 matches
Mail list logo
