Re: Systemvm.iso on kvm

2014-05-14 Thread Marcus
It is in the RPM/DEB. One installs the agent and common packages on a KVM host. On Apr 14, 2014 7:16 PM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote: I am curious as to how does the systemvm.iso gets pushed onto the KVM host ? Lets say I upgrade from 4.2.1 to 4.3 and there is some ssvm agent code

Re: How to increase size of root volume in Cloud stack 4.2.0

2014-05-01 Thread Marcus
Only for KVM, nobody has picked up the work to extend it to other hypervisors, yet, as far as I know. On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: On 29.04.2014 20:26, Prakash Rao Banuka wrote: Hi, One of VMs root volume is getting filled,How to increase the size of root

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.1.0

2014-04-29 Thread Marcus
+1 (binding), installed and ran some scripts that utilize cloudmonkey On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Srikanteswararao Talluri srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com wrote: I have tested username and password support for cloud monkey. 1. It breaks when a non privileged user issue some

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.1.0

2014-04-29 Thread Marcus
cloudmonkey no longer supports the unprivileged port? On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote: Hi, thanks for the testing. Answers inline From: Srikanteswararao Talluri srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.1.0

2014-04-29 Thread Marcus
and will not work without an apikey and secret key. What would be the point of using the unprivileged port? From: Marcus shadow...@gmail.commailto:shadow...@gmail.com Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org

Re: Creating or customising OS type

2014-04-24 Thread Marcus
the default thing. http://marcus.mlsorensen.com/cloudstack-extras/nux/cloudstack-agent-4.3.0-1.el6.x86_64.rpm If that works I can commit the fix. It worked for me, but I was testing master. On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: I see you mention 4.3, is it your own

Re: Creating or customising OS type

2014-04-24 Thread Marcus
Well, the agent is what decides. The 'vm start' command is sent to the agent will all of the relevant details, and the agent creates the libvirt xml to start the vm. On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 2:30 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: On 24.04.2014 07:58, Marcus wrote: I have an agent for you to try

Re: Creating or customising OS type

2014-04-24 Thread Marcus
:33 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: On 24.04.2014 15:14, Marcus wrote: Well, the agent is what decides. The 'vm start' command is sent to the agent will all of the relevant details, and the agent creates the libvirt xml to start the vm. Ahh, alright, makes sense. Well, it'd be great

Re: Creating or customising OS type

2014-04-24 Thread Marcus
Since other hypervisors are already doing it, I have no problem making the KVM agent 'aware' of the magic strings. I'll commit this for future releases. On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: On 25.04.2014 00:37, Marcus wrote: updated the patch. You can also see

Re: Creating or customising OS type

2014-04-23 Thread Marcus
are you using? And what OS is the guest agent running on? On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 7:42 PM, ilya musayev ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.comwrote: I'm KVM useless, perhaps Marcus knows the way. My mysql output is very different from yours btw. Regards ilya On 4/23/14, 4:44 AM, Nux! wrote

Re: Creating or customising OS type

2014-04-23 Thread Marcus
I see you mention 4.3, is it your own build or from the release artifacts? On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Guest OS types that will get Virtio disks include: Ubuntu Fedora CentOS RedHat 6 Debian Other PV And unfortunately, they also get virtio nics

createTags is async?

2014-04-22 Thread Marcus
Can anyone tell me off the top of their head why the createTags call is async? Is it doing something other than inserting a db entry? Or perhaps a better question is where the threshold is for sync vs async, for example, createNetwork is sync, but is rather blocky.

Re: createTags is async?

2014-04-22 Thread Marcus
ok, sounds good. On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Alena Prokharchyk alena.prokharc...@citrix.com wrote: Marcus, its due to CS API convention - all apis added after 2.x version of CS, should be async (except for list* commands). It was designed this way after hitting the problem when

Re: Upgrade from 4.1.1 to 4.3.0 ( KVM, Traffic labels, Adv. VLAN ) VR's bug

2014-04-20 Thread Marcus
No idea, but have you verified that the vm is running the new system vm template? What happens if you destroy the router and let it recreate? On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Serg Senko kernc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi After upgrade and restarting system-VM's all VR started with some bad network

Re: unable to connect to /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/v-1-VM.agent

2014-04-20 Thread Marcus
No, it has nothing to do with ssh or libvirt daemon. It's the literal unix socket that is created for virtio-serial communication when the qemu process starts. The question is why the system is refusing access to the socket. I assume this is being attempted as root. On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 9:58

Re: unable to connect to /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/v-1-VM.agent

2014-04-20 Thread Marcus
You may want to look in the qemu log of the vm to see if there's something deeper going on, perhaps the qemu process is not fully starting due to some other issue. /var/log/libvirt/qemu/v-1-VM.log, or something like that. On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 11:22 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote

Re: unable to connect to /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/v-1-VM.agent

2014-04-20 Thread Marcus
(in other words, some failures are expected). It could be related, but it could also be that the system vm is failing to come up for any other reason, and this is just the thing you noticed. On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: You may want to look in the qemu log

Re: Live migration failed to newly provisioned KVM host

2014-04-18 Thread Marcus
Yes, it looks as though the two machines are running different versions of qemu/libvirt, as the destination doesn't support the machine type that the VM has defined in it's XML on the source host. On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: On 18.04.2014 19:45, Indra Pramana

[ANNOUNCE] Yoshikazu Nojima as committer

2014-04-18 Thread Marcus
We are pleased to announce that Yoshikazu Nojima has accepted the role of committer for the Apache CloudStack project. He has made various improvements to the networking and storage code in CloudStack over the last year, and we look forward to his continued contributions and involvement in the

Re: CS cores vs sockets

2014-04-18 Thread Marcus
: Re: CS cores vs sockets From: shadow...@gmail.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sorry, that was a *thumbsup*, but I forgot that the list doesn't like HTML On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: On 17.04.2014 22:19, Marcus wrote: [?] Thanks for implementing

Re: java6 is installed instead of java7 when CloudStack rpm which build from master branch is installed with yum command.

2014-04-18 Thread Marcus
Thanks. Just an FYI, I usually have a hard time finding this doc, but here are some guidelines for commits. The big thing here is that if you include the Jira bug id in the commit it will publish the commit to the ticket automatically. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Git

Re: CS cores vs sockets

2014-04-17 Thread Marcus
With KVM this has been mitigated somewhat in newer code (4.3 and up). It's a bit rudimentary, but we could expand it to work via config options. Right now, if the number of cores is divisible by 4, it creates quad core sockets. If the number is divisible by 6, it creates hexacore sockets, with the

Re: CS cores vs sockets

2014-04-17 Thread Marcus
Or like you mention, service offerings could have a 'cores per socket' setting. On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: With KVM this has been mitigated somewhat in newer code (4.3 and up). It's a bit rudimentary, but we could expand it to work via config options

Re: CS cores vs sockets

2014-04-17 Thread Marcus
Original message /divdivFrom: Marcus shadow...@gmail.com /divdivDate:04/17/2014 1:07 PM (GMT-06:00) /divdivTo: dev@cloudstack.apache.org /divdivSubject: Re: CS cores vs sockets /divdiv /div With KVM this has been mitigated somewhat in newer code (4.3 and up). It's a bit

Re: CS cores vs sockets

2014-04-17 Thread Marcus
Sorry, that was a *thumbsup*, but I forgot that the list doesn't like HTML On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: On 17.04.2014 22:19, Marcus wrote: [?] Thanks for implementing this for KVM that is. :) -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux

Re: Instance on KVM + NFS fails

2014-04-16 Thread Marcus
I'm positive I tested one of the last RCs with NFS, but I'm running through a fresh install with the release RPMs to see if I can reproduce it. On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Yitao Jiang willier...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, David Did u see anything wrong within kvm agent log file? Thanks,

Re: Instance on KVM + NFS fails

2014-04-16 Thread Marcus
,path:/nfs/primary,port:2049,url:NetworkFilesystem://172.17.10.10//nfs/primary/?ROLE=PrimarySTOREUUID=2fe9a944-505e-38cb-bf87-72623634be4a}},name:202-2-f40033ea-61c3-3e02-823f-d279eeab3e44,hypervisorType:KVM}},executeInSequence:false,options:{},wait:10800}}] } On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Marcus

Re: Instance on KVM + NFS fails

2014-04-16 Thread Marcus
turn on debugging for the agent: sed -i 's/INFO/DEBUG/g' /etc/cloudstack/agent/log4j-cloud.xml then look in /var/log/cloudstack/agent/agent.log On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:07 AM, La Motta, David david.lamo...@netapp.com wrote: Hi Jang, where exactly is that log file? :-) David La Motta

Re: Instance on KVM + NFS fails

2014-04-16 Thread Marcus
Just comparing your output to mine, your TemplateObjectTO has no path attribute. This would suggest that the template does not exist on your secondary storage (or perhaps CloudStack doesn't know about it). Also, something is bothering me here. It complains about KVMStorageProcessor.java line 150,

Re: Instance on KVM + NFS fails

2014-04-16 Thread Marcus
Yes, it wouldn't start without a disk :-) On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:39 AM, La Motta, David david.lamo...@netapp.com wrote: Thanks, Marcus. The virtual router can’t start, either. 2014-04-16 09:28:52,874 DEBUG [kvm.resource.KVMHAMonitor] (Thread-4:null) Found NFS storage pool 9e3145ae-6074

Re: KVM, Re-create VR failed

2014-04-14 Thread Marcus
Your agent snippet just looks like the system trying to stop the vm. If a vm fails to start, it will also run through the stop routine to clean up all of the prework, so the 'failed to stop' debug is all normal. You may need to go above and look at why it failed to start. On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at

Re: Review Request 19446: CLOUDSTACK-6191: Volume provisioning type option

2014-04-10 Thread Marcus Sorensen
On April 10, 2014, 3:29 p.m., Marcus Sorensen wrote: Ship It! commit 11f5bdd78de4121331b07995800f6e9e7c22f2c0 Author: Marcus Sorensen mar...@betterservers.com Date: Thu Apr 10 09:23:04 2014 -0600 CLOUDSTACK-6191 Add support for specifying volume provisioning type (thin, sparse

Re: Review Request 19446: CLOUDSTACK-6191: Volume provisioning type option

2014-04-10 Thread Marcus Sorensen
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19446/#review40019 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Marcus Sorensen On April 9, 2014, 10:58 p.m

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #609

2014-04-10 Thread Marcus Sorensen
going again. On 4/10/14, 9:38 AM, jenk...@cloudstack.org wrote: See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/609/changes Changes: [marcus] CLOUDSTACK-6191 Add support for specifying volume provisioning -- [...truncated 3066 lines...] [ERROR

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #609

2014-04-10 Thread Marcus Sorensen
Ok, now I can't get it to fail locally in Linux or Mac, even with deleting my ~/.m2. Not sure what's going on. On 4/10/14, 9:48 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: Hmm, sorry. I thought master was fixed, as we saw complaints about the rados stuff yesterday (and I saw it on my linux vm as well

Re: OpenSSL vunerability (bleedheart)

2014-04-09 Thread Marcus
Should just pull in the latest and work, if we're talking about building a fresh system vm. Do we even have any services running in the system vm that require an update? We don't do SSL termination with haproxy for load balancers (yet), and I don't think that the apache web stuff for

Re: OpenSSL vunerability (bleedheart)

2014-04-09 Thread Marcus
Maybe the console? I haven't used that in forever, does it do SSL? On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: On 09.04.2014 17:21, Marcus wrote: Should just pull in the latest and work, if we're talking about building a fresh system vm. Do we even have any services running

Re: OpenSSL vunerability (bleedheart)

2014-04-09 Thread Marcus
It might be good to add the particulars of what in the system VMs have problems, so people know what urgency there is. For example, if the only system vm that has an SSL service running on it is console proxy, then an immediate mitigation is to focus on updating that (or shut it down). It doesn't

Re: OpenSSL vunerability (bleedheart)

2014-04-09 Thread Marcus
Thanks, that's great clarification. On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: Courtesy Chiradeep - CPVM uses JSSE so that should not be affected - VR is not affected since it does not offer any HTTPS/TLS service. The RA VPN and S2S VPN use the

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #562

2014-04-09 Thread Marcus
Since it complains about rados jar, do you think it's related to this? commit 09f83e48eb28ebd879f5431ec6e84c3ff26acfd9 Author: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl Date: Tue Apr 8 17:43:50 2014 +0200 CLOUDSTACK-4665: Depend on rados-java 0.1.4 This fixes the ArrayIndexOutOfBounds

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #562

2014-04-09 Thread Marcus
compile succeeded after rolling back to the commit prior that one. On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Since it complains about rados jar, do you think it's related to this? commit 09f83e48eb28ebd879f5431ec6e84c3ff26acfd9 Author: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl

Re: Review Request 19446: CLOUDSTACK-6191: Volume provisioning type option

2014-04-09 Thread Marcus Sorensen
/orchestration/VolumeOrchestrator.java https://reviews.apache.org/r/19446/#comment72750 Building to test now. Does this patch contain changes that are unrelated to the feature? Or are changes such as this integral to the function of the feature? - Marcus Sorensen On April 9, 2014, 10:58 p.m

Re: Review Request 19446: CLOUDSTACK-6191: Volume provisioning type option

2014-04-09 Thread Marcus Sorensen
On April 10, 2014, 12:16 a.m., Marcus Sorensen wrote: engine/orchestration/src/org/apache/cloudstack/engine/orchestration/VolumeOrchestrator.java, line 1270 https://reviews.apache.org/r/19446/diff/3-4/?file=538059#file538059line1270 Building to test now. Does

Re: Review Request 19446: CLOUDSTACK-6191: Volume provisioning type option

2014-04-09 Thread Marcus Sorensen
the agent side the code looks fine. I'll defer to Mike regarding the offering changes since he's done some work there before. - Marcus Sorensen On April 9, 2014, 10:58 p.m., Yoshikazu Nojima wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e

Re: OpenSSL vunerability (bleedheart)

2014-04-08 Thread Marcus
your mail server as well if it allows TLS connections (do the command above to see if TLS server extension heartbeat is supported). And openvpn if you run VPN servers. On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: On 08.04.2014 18:24, Marcus wrote: For anyone who doesn't know

Re: OpenSSL vunerability (bleedheart)

2014-04-08 Thread Marcus
That's a better test. On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: On 08.04.2014 18:40, Marcus wrote: I haven't read up on the actual mechanism, but it basically tricks the server process into adding 64k of random memory from its process space into the TLS heartbeat payload

Re: OpenSSL vunerability (bleedheart)

2014-04-08 Thread Marcus
Looks like issues.apache.org is ok. On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: That's a better test. On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: On 08.04.2014 18:40, Marcus wrote: I haven't read up on the actual mechanism, but it basically tricks

Re: CloudStack call to KVM

2014-04-07 Thread Marcus
The DeployVMCmd.java file has a 'create' and an 'execute' method. The create method is responsible for registering the VM and persisting it in the database, the logical creation. The 'execute' starts the vm, if the API call requires it. It calls the userVmService.startVirtualMachine, which I think

Re: CloudStack call to KVM

2014-04-07 Thread Marcus
by just searching the code for e.g. StartCommand in this case. On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: The DeployVMCmd.java file has a 'create' and an 'execute' method. The create method is responsible for registering the VM and persisting it in the database

Re: how to keep the world from ending

2014-04-03 Thread Marcus Sorensen
Uh... sorry. Autocomplete FTL. This was supposed to be to our internal team. On 04/03/2014 10:59 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: For those who missed the info yesterday. This is mostly for developers. * Commit your changes every day * Push to production daily * Test what you pushed

Re: how to keep the world from ending

2014-04-03 Thread Marcus
Yeah, we're going through this... thing. Sorry for the noise. On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:37 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: I thought you were advocating CD (Yay!) and then the 'push to production' seemed out of place. --David On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Marcus Sorensen mar

Re: Converting QCOW2 to VHD

2014-04-02 Thread Marcus
I've only ever gone the other way, but I know there's some documentation lingering around about a two-step process for converting to vhd. On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Hello, I have used qemu-img to successfully convert a qcow2 image to vpc (vhd, these names give

Re: [DESIGN] No agent calls within database transactions....

2014-03-31 Thread Marcus
Yeah, that assert issue has bitten us once or twice, and I know Ryan squawked about it at some point. Do we have any point where enforcement will occur (BVT or some other tests)? On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote: Hi All, I was alerted to this problem

Re: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

2014-03-31 Thread Marcus
I'm running 3 mgmt servers on 4.2.1, haven't seen any issues like that. You can send along your memory settings... here's what I'm running: JAVA_OPTS=-Djava.awt.headless=true -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=45219 -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.authenticate=false

Re: how to detect when deployDataCenter.py has finished provisioning?

2014-03-30 Thread Marcus
I don't remember that script actually installing any templates. There's just the built-in template that is there even before the zone. Or is this specific to your devcloud.cfg? In my tests, after running deployDataCenter.py I call registerTemplate and install my own tiny template, then with the

Re: how to detect when deployDataCenter.py has finished provisioning?

2014-03-30 Thread Marcus
When you enable the zone, the mgmt server detects no secondary storage vm, launches that, and also detects that there are templates that need to be downloaded. I'm not entirely sure of the mechanisms and what triggers, what, but it's kicked off indirectly when the zone is enabled. On Sun, Mar 30,

Re: how to detect when deployDataCenter.py has finished provisioning?

2014-03-30 Thread Marcus
And when I say 'you', I mean the deployDataCenter.py script. On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: When you enable the zone, the mgmt server detects no secondary storage vm, launches that, and also detects that there are templates that need to be downloaded. I'm

Re: [PROPOSAL] ROOT volume detach - feature for CS 4.5

2014-03-28 Thread Marcus
datastore). On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Alena Prokharchyk alena.prokharc...@citrix.com wrote: On 3/28/14, 3:50 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: I see this feature as mainly just shuffling around object properties in the database. I don't expect any major issues to arise with any

Re: [PROPOSAL] ROOT volume detach - feature for CS 4.5

2014-03-28 Thread Marcus
with the VM config files that are new being used in conjunction with a disk in another datastore). On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Alena Prokharchyk alena.prokharc...@citrix.com wrote: On 3/28/14, 3:50 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: I see this feature as mainly just shuffling around

Re: Review Request 19730: Bugfix: CLOUDSTACK-6292 live migration failed because of VNC server address is not changed

2014-03-27 Thread Marcus Sorensen
/libvirt/qemu.conf, I suppose. - Marcus Sorensen On March 27, 2014, 5:53 p.m., Yoshikazu Nojima wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19730

Re: Review Request 19446: CLOUDSTACK-6191: Volume provisioning type option

2014-03-27 Thread Marcus Sorensen
-4993-4f46-8481-701ad482abe7 due to a failed executing of qemu-img: Unknown option 'preallocation'Invalid options for file format 'raw'. - Marcus Sorensen On March 26, 2014, 11:24 p.m., Yoshikazu Nojima wrote: --- This is an automatically

Re: Review Request 19446: CLOUDSTACK-6191: Volume provisioning type option

2014-03-27 Thread Marcus Sorensen
On March 27, 2014, 11:27 p.m., Marcus Sorensen wrote: So far I'm getting this. I want to go back and test without the patch, because with LVM it should be 'lvcreate' follwed by 'qemu-img convert', and I want to see if it's due to the patch, or another change: 2014-03-27 17:23

Re: Review Request 19446: CLOUDSTACK-6191: Volume provisioning type option

2014-03-27 Thread Marcus Sorensen
On March 27, 2014, 11:27 p.m., Marcus Sorensen wrote: So far I'm getting this. I want to go back and test without the patch, because with LVM it should be 'lvcreate' follwed by 'qemu-img convert', and I want to see if it's due to the patch, or another change: 2014-03-27 17:23

Re: Review Request 19446: CLOUDSTACK-6191: Volume provisioning type option

2014-03-27 Thread Marcus Sorensen
[utils.script.Script] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Executing: /bin/bash -c cp -f /mnt/939559aa-1bac-310a-a2ce-205336bdb136/2d7d88a8-6233-3ce1-9292-bc805d2e92e5.qcow2 /var/lib/libvirt/images/11b71cf8-382f-4b38-a2b0-45e148a010e7 - Marcus Sorensen On March 26, 2014, 11:24 p.m., Yoshikazu Nojima

Re: Review Request 19446: CLOUDSTACK-6191: Volume provisioning type option

2014-03-27 Thread Marcus Sorensen
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19446/#review38852 --- I have verified that LVM still works without this patch. - Marcus

Re: [PROPOSAL] ROOT volume detach - feature for CS 4.5

2014-03-24 Thread Marcus
Yes, I think we need a call to change disk type between data and root On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Alena Prokharchyk alena.prokharc...@citrix.com wrote: I would like to propose a new feature for CS 4.5 - ROOT volume detach - that enables support for following use cases: 1) Replace

cloudstack talent

2014-03-20 Thread Marcus
Is there a jobs board/list where people can post or investigate CloudStack related jobs? Or is that taboo due to the Apache model of separation between an individual's employment and community roles?

Re: cloudstack talent

2014-03-20 Thread Marcus
Normally I'm looking to hire, but its also nice to survey the opportunities out there. On Mar 20, 2014 9:06 AM, ilya musayev ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote: Marcus, Not the best place, but CloudStack LinkedIn group has job posting section. btw, are you looking for a change or need

Re: Review Request 19446: CLOUDSTACK-6191: Volume provisioning type option

2014-03-20 Thread Marcus Sorensen
/#comment70021 Is this applicable to the change, or something accidentally committed? - Marcus Sorensen On March 20, 2014, 4:56 a.m., Yoshikazu Nojima wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https

Re: Review Request 19446: CLOUDSTACK-6191: Volume provisioning type option

2014-03-20 Thread Marcus Sorensen
. - Marcus Sorensen On March 20, 2014, 4:56 a.m., Yoshikazu Nojima wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19446

Re: CloudStack implementations

2014-03-19 Thread Marcus
I think we'd want to make it such that it wouldn't require external access to report, if possible. I just think there may be plenty of intranet/local deployments, or people who have private management servers and separate public UIs. 2014-03-19 16:59 GMT-06:00 Demetrius Tsitrelis

Re: Resetting a VM is broken?

2014-03-19 Thread Marcus
The storage gets marked as 'Destroy' state. Then it goes to 'Expunging' when the storage cleanup interval occurs. I've actually thought about leveraging that for data disks, the current delete data disk immediately cleans up the disk, when we could create an api call that just moves the data disk

Re: Resetting a VM is broken?

2014-03-19 Thread Marcus
+1 to reset being a bad verb for this. It's too late now, however. On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: The storage gets marked as 'Destroy' state. Then it goes to 'Expunging' when the storage cleanup interval occurs. I've actually thought about leveraging

CloudStack implementations

2014-03-18 Thread Marcus
Do we have any general stats on how cloudstack is being used? Common deployment sizes, largest deployments, etc? I'm curious as to how far people have actually scaled it in real deployments, although I realize that the info can be proprietary.

Re: CloudStack implementations

2014-03-18 Thread Marcus
, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote: On 03/18/2014 12:07 PM, Marcus wrote: Do we have any general stats on how cloudstack is being used? Common deployment sizes, largest deployments, etc? I'm curious as to how far people have actually scaled it in real deployments, although

Re: CloudStack implementations

2014-03-18 Thread Marcus
If you do the math on that twitter slide, it looks like the poll represents ~140 responses. I wonder how that poll was marketed as opposed to Giles' 270 responses. On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: On 18.03.2014 11:07, Marcus wrote: Do we have any general stats

Re: [MERGE] resize-root branch

2014-03-17 Thread Marcus
17, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote: Hi Marcus, I found an issue with this merge, my previous marvin test is broken in deployVirtualMachine if no rootdisksize is passed. All previous marvin tests are written without passing this parameter. Can you take a look

Re: upgrading from CloudPlatform 4.2.0 to CloudStack 4.3.0

2014-03-17 Thread Marcus
I never did get an answer as to how those upgrade instructions are supposed to work. I did however look at the code and we came up with our own procedure. It's a bit messy because it involves changing the db, use at your own risk. 1. Make changes to system vm template. save as

Re: [MERGE] resize-root branch

2014-03-17 Thread Marcus
...@apache.org On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: I'll take a look. I wasn't the one who added the details map to base.py, although I did add to it and can probably figure out what's wrong. The original commit didn't change any deployVirtualMachine calls. Can you give me

Re: [MERGE] resize-root branch

2014-03-17 Thread Marcus
This commit in 4.4 should fix it (cherry picked to master as well): commit 8eed3c5113d1141be820077e121db802566faec6 Author: Marcus Sorensen mar...@betterservers.com Date: Fri Mar 14 07:13:34 2014 -0600 Change newly added details map for deployVirtualMachine to an empty map, instead

Re: [Merge] CloudStack IAM branch to master

2014-03-15 Thread Marcus
wrote: For a new feature, I'd agree that squashed-merge is better. From: Marcus shadow...@gmail.commailto:shadow...@gmail.commailto: shadow...@gmail.com Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto: dev

Re: [Merge] CloudStack IAM branch to master

2014-03-15 Thread Marcus
, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, I've been down that road before and its not always fun. On Mar 15, 2014 4:49 AM, Rajani Karuturi rajani.karut...@citrix.com wrote: I think preserving the history is important. Especially for the developer to understand the history if it and why he did

Re: Anybody saw this error on master?

2014-03-14 Thread Marcus
I see this on KVM as well. I don't recall hearing about the GPU feature, sounds interesting. 014-03-14 01:14:06,302 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl] (StatsCollector-1:ctx-b3b2e81f) Details from executing class com.cloud.agent.api.GetGPUStatsCommand: Unsupported command

Re: Anybody saw this error on master?

2014-03-14 Thread Marcus
oh yes, I do remember this. We probably need to fix the null pointer, but I think it's more or less just noise. On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: I see this on KVM as well. I don't recall hearing about the GPU feature, sounds interesting. 014-03-14 01:14

Re: [Merge] CloudStack IAM branch to master

2014-03-14 Thread Marcus
(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Min, in looking at this branch merge, I need to be reminded whether we are supposed to squash feature branches when they come in, or preserve history. It's nice to preserve

Re: [Merge] CloudStack IAM branch to master

2014-03-14 Thread Marcus
:03 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: I have no idea if its related to this branch merge or not, but I'm unable to start the ssvm on master since I pulled about an hour ago. I can deploy a fresh zone, and the ssvm will actually start, but it can't transition state in the DB, so it kills the vm

Re: 4.4 Feature Freeze

2014-03-14 Thread Marcus
). Cheers, Hugo Can someone confirm if this has made it in? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6181 Marcus requested the MERGE a couple of days ago. http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@cloudstack.apache.org/msg24793.html Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg

RE: 4.4 Feature Freeze

2014-03-14 Thread Marcus
be blocked for further check-ins till blocking issue is fixed. Talluri is running BVTs and can that be taken as basic passing criteria to re-enable check-ins. -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 6:36 AM To: dev

Re: 4.4 Feature Freeze

2014-03-14 Thread Marcus
It may even just be a behavioral change or something simple I missed that is now required with a recent check-in. Obviously I don't feel comfortable merging in my feature branch though when I pull from master and can no longer run my own feature tests. On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Marcus

Re: 4.4 Feature Freeze

2014-03-14 Thread Marcus
be opened up for further check ins. Just a suggestion. -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 7:40 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: 4.4 Feature Freeze It may even just be a behavioral change or something simple I missed

Re: [ACS4.4] RE: Git Push Summary : 4.4 feature branch

2014-03-14 Thread Marcus
Yes, you did. I for one was up until 2AM trying to test my branch against the current master to try to get it in, but gave up. I think most people saw Get your merge request in today because I'll be cutting the branch on Friday. At the time that most of us in the west read that email, get your

Re: [Merge] CloudStack IAM branch to master

2014-03-14 Thread Marcus
to preserve the change history? -Original Message- From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 9:35 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [Merge] CloudStack IAM branch to master Thanks Marcus. I am not aware of this convention, will remember

Re: [Merge] CloudStack IAM branch to master

2014-03-14 Thread Marcus
...@citrix.com wrote: Marcus, What is the latest commit you have picked up on your local setup from master? Our QA reports similar issues caused by recent VMSync bug fix, just want to make sure that your local code has that fix. Thanks -min On 3/14/14 9:37 AM, Min Chen min.c

Re: [Merge] CloudStack IAM branch to master

2014-03-14 Thread Marcus
It's in branch resize-root On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote: Marcus, What is the latest commit you have picked up on your local setup from master? Our QA reports similar issues caused by recent VMSync bug fix, just want to make sure that your local

Re: [REVIEW] OpenStack Swift as Object Storage Service

2014-03-14 Thread Marcus
I agree. It's not immediately clear to me why there's a prerequisite that the traffic for both mgmt servers and swift have to go to the same IP. It also eliminates the use of v1.0 and v1 for other purposes, as its very common for REST API routes to start with something like that (say the CS mgmt

Re: [Merge] CloudStack IAM branch to master

2014-03-14 Thread Marcus
Can we get the fix in 4.4? I'd rather sync that then master, since it has been cut already. On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Kelven Yang kelven.y...@citrix.com wrote: Marcus, I¹ve pushed the fix to master already. You probably need to sync your local branch with master Kelven On 3/14/14

Re: [Merge] CloudStack IAM branch to master

2014-03-14 Thread Marcus
That is, I'll pull the current 4.4 into my branch and test before I merge it in On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Can we get the fix in 4.4? I'd rather sync that then master, since it has been cut already. On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Kelven Yang

Re: Release cadence

2014-03-13 Thread Marcus
The overlap is simply a byproduct of cutting the branch, I'm not sure there's a way around it. It's a good point though, that essentially the window is 1 month shorter than I think was intended. Better testing will help that, however, with the point being that we shouldn't be doing a ton of work

Re: Release cadence

2014-03-13 Thread Marcus
at 11:03 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: The overlap is simply a byproduct of cutting the branch, I'm not sure there's a way around it. It's a good point though, that essentially the window is 1 month shorter than I think was intended. Better testing will help that, however

Re: [Merge] CloudStack IAM branch to master

2014-03-13 Thread Marcus
Min, in looking at this branch merge, I need to be reminded whether we are supposed to squash feature branches when they come in, or preserve history. It's nice to preserve history, but it's a lot easier to undo a squashed merge. On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >