using
XenServer 6.0.2.!
Can somebody give more information on this?
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards,
Swen Brüseke
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Remi Bergsma [mailto:r...@remi.nl]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Mai 2015 12:36
An: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: Re
).
There are some details we'd want to take care of, but this flow makes
sense
to me, and we could use it even with upgrades.
-tim
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 6:04 AM, Remi Bergsma r...@remi.nl wrote:
Hi all,
Since CloudStack 4.4 the implementation of HA in CloudStack was changed
to
use
Hi all,
Since CloudStack 4.4 the implementation of HA in CloudStack was changed to
use the XenHA feature of XenServer. As of 4.4, it is expected to have XenHA
enabled for the pool (not for the VMs!) and so XenServer will be the one to
elect a new pool master, whereas CloudStack did it before.
...@solidfire.com
wrote:
Congratulations, Remi!
On Friday, May 1, 2015, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has asked Remi Bergsma to become a committer and we are pleased to
announce that he has accepted.
Remi has reported
Hi Rohit,
Nice work!
I agree we need an environment that does run on something else than the local
machine, as we need more horse power. We worked on something similar, where we
have a cluster of KVM controlled by CloudStack in our Employee Cloud and spin
large VMs running CentOS 7.1 (we use
+1 Totally agree and willing to help make it happen!
Sent from my iPhone
On 30 Apr 2015, at 04:12, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
The problem is really two fold.
Cutting an RC isn't terribly time consuming, once you've done it a
dozen times or so, it goes by pretty quickly.
The
Hi Rafael,
Welcome to CloudStack and thanks for your mail.
What RPM packages did you use for your testing?
From my personal experience I know that the CentOS7 (el7) packages for
CloudStack 4.4 work just fine as a KVM hypervisor (on CentOS 7.1). In 4.5 work
is done to also make it work as a
+1
@Marcus: This is also something on my wish list :-)
@Nux: When we look at SELinux, we should also make it work with AppArmor
(Ubuntu). I think it should not be too hard to fix this for the KVM agent,
as both provide tools to record the permissions and create profiles. But
you never know what
: CloudyAngus
paul.an...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Remi Bergsma [mailto:r...@remi.nl]
Sent: 22 April 2015 10:25
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Next ACS release?
I'd be happy to help here as well. Last week in Austin, we also discussed
this topic a couple
I'd be happy to help here as well. Last week in Austin, we also discussed
this topic a couple of times. I do agree shorter release cycles are better.
In my opinion, the first thing to improve is the minor releases in both the
4.4 and 4.5 branches. If we speed those up to let's say once every
21, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Remi Bergsma r...@remi.nl wrote:
There are some fixes in 4.4.3 for kvm on CentOS7 so that's a good idea.
Regards, Remi
Sent from my iPhone
On 21 Apr 2015, at 18:09, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Hi Wido,
You can try the latest 4.4.3 release from
Hi Wido,
We run kvm on centos7 without problems. When I'm back in the office I will
check which package we used. It seems el6 is for centos6?
Will let you know!
Remi
Sent from my iPhone
On 21 Apr 2015, at 16:00, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi Daan,
Awesome!
Could you have a look at the release notes link? It’s a 404 now.
Regards,
Remi
On 21 Apr 2015, at 21:29 , Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
Mature, easy-to-deploy Open Source Cloud computing software platform
boasts improved efficiency and performance.
The
.
Regards,
Remi
On 21 Apr 2015, at 20:10 , Remi Bergsma r...@remi.nl wrote:
Hi,
The RPM’s I use were baked from the 4.4 branch (4.4.3-SNAPSHOT) a few weeks
back. Hence, the now released 4.4.3 should also work. Marcus is right, the
dependency is now on ‘java = 1.7.0’.
CentOS 7 support
MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/09/2015 12:26 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote:
Hi Daan,
If your doing another RC, consider including the fixes to the
kvmheartbeat script. There’s a final PR I just submitted to make it
work reliably. We’ve tested it in our employee cloud and it works
fine.
+1
Hi,
We’re testing KVM and noticed that a virtual router (non-VPC) gets two pubic ip
nics plugged. This is in 4.4.2 when using Open vSwitch on CentOS 7 (advanced
zone).
The reason for this, is that the first nic gets plugged by provisioning the
nic. Then, a second nic is plugged that gets the
I’ve just sent a PR to fix this issue in master. We do need to port it to 4.4
and 4.5 though.
Regards,
Remi
On 13 Apr 2015, at 16:11, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
Noem Rohit in de pull request. zijn bug
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Remi Bergsma
rberg
, Remi Bergsma
rberg...@schubergphilis.commailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
Hi Daan,
This is probably something we want to fix in 4.4.3?
If I try an upgrade from 4.4.x to 4.5 and above, then there's a SQL upgrade
command failing:
ERROR [c.c.u.d.ScriptRunner] (main:null) Error executing
:26 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote:
Hi Daan,
If your doing another RC, consider including the fixes to the
kvmheartbeat script. There’s a final PR I just submitted to make it
work reliably. We’ve tested it in our employee cloud and it works
fine.
+1
Is it in the 4.4 branch already?
Regards, Remi
On 09
Hi all,
If you happen to be at ApacheCon this week, it'd be cool to meet. I’m already
in Austin with Funs and Daan. Just ping us!
Tomorrow I'll do a talk [1] about automating CloudStack operations. Over the
past year and a half at Schuberg Philis I wrote quite some handy scripts to
help
Hi Daan,
If your doing another RC, consider including the fixes to the kvmheartbeat
script. There’s a final PR I just submitted to make it work reliably. We’ve
tested it in our employee cloud and it works fine.
Regards,
Remi
On 09 Apr 2015, at 11:27, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Daan,
Congratz Rohit, well deserved! :-)
Sent from my iPhone
On 27 Mar 2015, at 09:08, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack are pleased to
announce that Rohit Yadav has accepted our invitation to join the PMC.
Please join me in
Hi,
I recently discussed this with Funs as we want this as well. As a first step,
we could build 6to4 support on the VPC. Everything behind it can then still be
IPv4 while stuff is reachable over IPv6 as well.
This is a first step only. In the end we need native support for IPv6 within
Hi Daan,
Let's have a look tomorrow, ghxandsky refers to changes in CentOS6 package and
what we deployed is CentOS7. I do agree CentOS6 should still work (we still
need it as well).
Regards, Remi
Sent from my iPhone
On 24 Mar 2015, at 18:24, DaanHoogland g...@git.apache.org wrote:
Congratulations Sebastien!
Totally agree :-) It would really help in speeding up the release cycle and
achieve high quality at the same time.
We should aim for a release every month if you ask me. I know that sounds
impossible now, but let's discuss with such a goal in mind and see what we
Hi,
The rpm installed just fine and I was able to add the centos7 box to CloudStack
4.4.2
We do have some extra patches in our 4.4.2 version (all committed back to ACS
and should become 4.4.3) but I don't think that makes any difference for this
rpm.
Thanks Daan!
Sent from my iPhone
On
Hi,
I almost forgot about this :-)
If we can come up with something we all agree on, I can give it another try and
create a pull request. In the original tread we said we didn’t want to do it on
the server side. Do we still agree?
We talked about sorting domain drop down lists but there’s
branches. Do you want me to
revert the commits on master then?
On Thursday 12 March 2015 03:53 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote:
Hi Sebastien,
Thanks for the pointer, I’ve send pull requests to add it to 4.4 and 4.5.
Not sure if we want to add it to master as well? Could make sense if people
happy to
learn ;-)
Regards,
Remi
On 11 Mar 2015, at 18:49, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 11, 2015, at 5:26 PM, Remi Bergsma rberg...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
Hi,
It might be worth noting in the release notes of ACS 4.5 that
CLOUDSTACK-7595 is resolved, as this changes behaviour
Hi,
It might be worth noting in the release notes of ACS 4.5 that CLOUDSTACK-7595
is resolved, as this changes behaviour. We ran into this in 4.4 already where
we suddenly had timeouts that were not there before and it’s not immediately
clear why that happens.
job.cancel.threshold.minutes in
Hi Marcus,
Are the tweaks required to use centos7 as a hypervisor documented somewhere?
Does the same count for 4.6 aka master?
I will be looking into centos7 with kvm soon so would be cool to know what has
already be figured out :-)
Thanks, Remi
Sent from my iPhone
On 11 Mar 2015, at
Will have a look and give it a try, thanks.
Sent from my iPhone
On 11 Mar 2015, at 08:17, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
Look at the 4.5 vote thread, hopefully it will be rolled into the release
notes.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:04 AM, Remi Bergsma
rberg...@schubergphilis.com wrote
Congratz Wilder! Enjoy the ride :-)
Sent from my iPhone
On 01 Mar 2015, at 11:14, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has asked Wilder Rodrigues to become a committer and we are pleased to
announce that he has accepted.
Hi all,
In our employee cloud most of our employees have their own Domain to spin up
machines. Since we have 150+ domains and the lists are unsorted, it is very
hard to find the one you need. The order returned by the API is the order they
were added.
Without any knowledge of the CloudStack
that would remove hierarchy (as a sorting criteria).
Wouldn't it be good to sort just by path? (To me sorting looks like an
improvement, changing the format is more like a change that may cause
problem for some.)
Cheers,
Gabor
-Original Message-
From: Remi Bergsma [mailto:rberg
Hi guys,
We had some serious corruption today, described in CLOUDSTACK-7184 (XenServer
specific).
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7184
Some discussion/help on how to prevent these issues is appreciated. Thx!
Kind Regards,
Remi Bergsma
Hi Tim,
No, we do not use XenServer HA.
Remi
On 7/25/14, 5:46 PM, Tim Mackey tmac...@gmail.com wrote:
Remi,
Did you have the native XenServer HA enabled at the same time?
-tim
On Jul 25, 2014 8:31 AM, Remi Bergsma rberg...@schubergphilis.com
wrote:
Hi guys,
We had some serious
wanting
to see why XenServer allowed a vm to start with the same disk on two
hosts.
On Jul 25, 2014 8:53 AM, Remi Bergsma rberg...@schubergphilis.com
wrote:
Hi Tim,
No, we do not use XenServer HA.
Remi
On 7/25/14, 5:46 PM, Tim Mackey tmac...@gmail.com wrote:
Remi,
Did you have the native
musayev ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
Remi
Thanks for the friendly update.
Do you mind mentioning which version do you upgrade from?
Thanks
ilya
On 3/27/14, 10:47 AM, Remi Bergsma wrote:
Hi all,
Just a quick note we upgraded one of our cloud environments (~600 vms)
today
that re-creates
router vms on reboot REALLY saved us a lot of time. Cool!
Thanks for your hard work and congratulations on what looks like a great
release! :-)
Kind regards,
Remi Bergsma
301 - 340 of 340 matches
Mail list logo
