Re: Review Request 20123: Fix for cloudstack-6328 to Prevent console proxy support scripts from spawning multiple java processes

2014-08-04 Thread Saurav Lahiri
Lahiri wrote: Review request for cloudstack, Jayapal Reddy, Rajani Karuturi, Rajesh Battala, and Santhosh Edukulla. By Saurav Lahiri. *Updated April 23, 2014, 9:20 a.m.* *Repository: * cloudstack-git Description With multiple java processes writing to the same logfile, each is not aware

Re: Review Request 19584: CLOUDSTACK-6258: Disable systemvm cloud startup script from logging messages to /var/log/cloud/cloud.out

2014-04-23 Thread Saurav Lahiri
: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19584/#review40414 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Rajesh Battala On April 14, 2014, 7:10 a.m., Saurav Lahiri wrote

Re: Review Request 20123: Fix for cloudstack-6328 to Prevent console proxy support scripts from spawning multiple java processes

2014-04-23 Thread Saurav Lahiri
Santosh, Can you let me know ur thoughs If the review comments have been adequately addressed and the changes looks ok? Thanks Saurav On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Saurav Lahiri saurav.lah...@sungard.comwrote: This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https

Re: Review Request 20123: Fix for cloudstack-6328 to Prevent console proxy support scripts from spawning multiple java processes

2014-04-23 Thread Saurav Lahiri
/scripts/run.sh 146d96f systemvm/scripts/utils.sh PRE-CREATION Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20123/diff/ Testing --- Tested the changes with console proxy vm and secondary storage vm. They start and stop as expected. Thanks, Saurav Lahiri

Re: Review Request 20123: Fix for cloudstack-6328 to Prevent console proxy support scripts from spawning multiple java processes

2014-04-15 Thread Saurav Lahiri
with console proxy vm and secondary storage vm. They start and stop as expected. Thanks, Saurav Lahiri

Re: Review Request 20123: Fix for cloudstack-6328 to Prevent console proxy support scripts from spawning multiple java processes

2014-04-15 Thread Saurav Lahiri
://reviews.apache.org/r/20123/#review40251 --- On April 15, 2014, 11:50 a.m., Saurav Lahiri wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https

Re: Review Request 20123: Fix for cloudstack-6328 to Prevent console proxy support scripts from spawning multiple java processes

2014-04-15 Thread Saurav Lahiri
and stop as expected. Thanks, Saurav Lahiri

Re: Review Request 19584: CLOUDSTACK-6258: Disable systemvm cloud startup script from logging messages to /var/log/cloud/cloud.out

2014-04-14 Thread Saurav Lahiri
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19584/diff/ Testing --- The console proxy vm was started and console sessions tested. The secondary storage vm was succesfully started. Thanks, Saurav Lahiri

Review Request 20123: Fix for cloudstack-6328 to Prevent console proxy support scripts from spawning multiple java processes

2014-04-08 Thread Saurav Lahiri
/diff/ Testing --- Tested the changes with console proxy vm and secondary storage vm. They start and stop as expected. Thanks, Saurav Lahiri

Re: Review Request 19584: CLOUDSTACK-6258: Disable systemvm cloud startup script from logging messages to /var/log/cloud/cloud.out

2014-04-06 Thread Saurav Lahiri
or $CLOUD_DEBUG is 1 ? redirect to /dev/null when $CLOUD_DEBUG is 0 this way, it wont change the default behaviour of it. whoever doesnt want logging can set the variable to 0 Saurav Lahiri wrote: Since the earlier behaviour was causing the file system to fill up

Re: Review Request 19584: CLOUDSTACK-6258: Disable systemvm cloud startup script from logging messages to /var/log/cloud/cloud.out

2014-04-04 Thread Saurav Lahiri
-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19584/#review39517 --- On April 3, 2014, 2:12 p.m., Saurav Lahiri wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply

Re: Review Request 19584: CLOUDSTACK-6258: Disable systemvm cloud startup script from logging messages to /var/log/cloud/cloud.out

2014-04-04 Thread Saurav Lahiri
or $CLOUD_DEBUG is 1 ? redirect to /dev/null when $CLOUD_DEBUG is 0 this way, it wont change the default behaviour of it. whoever doesnt want logging can set the variable to 0 Saurav Lahiri wrote: Since the earlier behaviour was causing the file system to fill up

[REMINDER]Review Request 19584: CLOUDSTACK-6258: Disable systemvm cloud startup script from logging messages to /var/log/cloud/cloud.out

2014-04-03 Thread Saurav Lahiri
Hi Rajesh, Any thoughts/suggestions on the changes? Thanks Saurav On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Saurav Lahiri saurav.lah...@sungard.comwrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https

Re: Review Request 19584: CLOUDSTACK-6258: Disable systemvm cloud startup script from logging messages to /var/log/cloud/cloud.out

2014-04-03 Thread Saurav Lahiri
/cloud 83853bc Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19584/diff/ Testing --- The console proxy vm was started and console sessions tested. The secondary storage vm was succesfully started. Thanks, Saurav Lahiri

Re: Prevent console proxy support scripts from spawning multiple java processes

2014-04-02 Thread Saurav Lahiri
Raised defect : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6328 Thanks Saurav On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Saurav Lahiri saurav.lah...@sungardas.comwrote: Hi, The console proxy supporting scripts run.sh restarts the java process if it determines that for some reason the _run.sh

Prevent console proxy support scripts from spawning multiple java processes

2014-04-01 Thread Saurav Lahiri
Hi, The console proxy supporting scripts run.sh restarts the java process if it determines that for some reason the _run.sh has exited. If the original java process has exited then that is not an issue. If for some reason the java process is still running, then the while loop which calls _run.sh

Re: system vm disk space issue in ACS 4.3

2014-03-24 Thread Saurav Lahiri
. If this is not true, remove /var/run/agent.SecStorage.pid Appreciate the help. Thanks, Sunil On 3/19/14 8:40 AM, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote: Great. Post your patch at reviews.apache.org Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Saurav Lahiri

Review Request 19584: CLOUDSTACK-6258: Disable systemvm cloud startup script from logging messages to /var/log/cloud/cloud.out

2014-03-24 Thread Saurav Lahiri
was started and console sessions tested. The secondary storage vm was succesfully started. Thanks, Saurav Lahiri

Re: system vm disk space issue in ACS 4.3

2014-03-19 Thread Saurav Lahiri
in log4j-cloud.xml Thanks Saurav On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Saurav Lahiri saurav.lah...@sungard.comwrote: Could it have something to do with the RollingFileAppender that is being used. The following rollingfileappenderhttp://apache-logging.6191.n7.nabble.com/RollingFileAppender

Re: system vm disk space issue in ACS 4.3

2014-03-19 Thread Saurav Lahiri
your fix for review. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Saurav Lahiri [mailto:saurav.lah...@sungard.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 7:20 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: system vm disk space issue in ACS 4.3 The problem appears to be the start function

Re: system vm disk space issue in ACS 4.3

2014-03-17 Thread Saurav Lahiri
Could it have something to do with the RollingFileAppender that is being used. The following rollingfileappenderhttp://apache-logging.6191.n7.nabble.com/RollingFileAppender-not-working-consistently-td8582.html link appears to be a bit outdated but they more or less describe a similar problem

Re: CLOUDSTACK-5663

2014-03-03 Thread Saurav Lahiri
Parth, Can you shed some light on how this issue can be recreated. As mentioned earlier it looks like it is going through the non shared network code path, why this has happened is not very clear. Thanks Saurav On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Saurav Lahiri saurav.lah...@sungard.comwrote

Re: CLOUDSTACK-5663

2014-02-26 Thread Saurav Lahiri
Thank you very much. I will follow up on this with Parth. Saurav On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Alena Prokharchyk alena.prokharc...@citrix.com wrote: Thank you, Dave. Saurav, I¹ve assigned the bug to you. -Alena. On 2/25/14, 10:15 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: As for the

Re: CLOUDSTACK-5663

2014-02-25 Thread Saurav Lahiri
users DB in order to become an assignee. Whoever administers Jira, can you please do it? -Alena. On 2/24/14, 5:01 AM, Saurav Lahiri saurav.lah...@sungard.com wrote: Hi All, I started looking at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5663 If anybody is actively looking

CLOUDSTACK-5663

2014-02-24 Thread Saurav Lahiri
Hi All, I started looking at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5663 If anybody is actively looking into this please let me know else i can continue with this. Parth It looks like it is hitting the code path for non shared networks.You have mentioned that you are using shared

Re: [DISCUSS](CLOUDSTACK-3471)Provide an API to extract the log statements of a given jobid

2014-02-11 Thread Saurav Lahiri
give it a try and let me know if this serves the purpose and the defect can be closed. Thanks Saurav On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Saurav Lahiri saurav.lah...@sungard.comwrote: Hi Chiradeep, Appreciate your feedback. Sure I am ok with creating and running a seperate service. Just

Re: Working on CloudStack Jira-764:nTier Apps 2.0 : Redundant Virtual Router for VPC email 2 of 2

2014-01-24 Thread Saurav Lahiri
, Saurav Lahiri saurav.lah...@sungard.com wrote: Daan, So looking at what is available today for guest network, the Redundant VR can be enabled only for the source nat service. I guess the mention of the source nat router is in relation to that. I could be wrong though. It appears

Re: Working on CloudStack Jira-764:nTier Apps 2.0 : Redundant Virtual Router for VPC email 2 of 2

2014-01-16 Thread Saurav Lahiri
Daan, So looking at what is available today for guest network, the Redundant VR can be enabled only for the source nat service. I guess the mention of the source nat router is in relation to that. I could be wrong though. It appears that the other services like vpn, dhcp, dns do not benefit much

Communication between Management Server and guest vm deployed by root admin user

2014-01-12 Thread Saurav Lahiri
Hi, Would anybody know if there is a way that guest vms deployed by root admin can be included in the system management network or routing configured to allow traffic flow between the management server and this guest vm. What I am trying to achieve is push the management server logs to a guest

Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL]root admin api to deploy default system vm

2014-01-07 Thread Saurav Lahiri
against using the systemvm. It seems inconvenient to me, that's all. If you have your own template you can deploy your add-on recardless of the underlying ACS. Maybe I am being over paranoid so don't take my reaction as -1 or such. happy new year, On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Saurav Lahiri

Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL]root admin api to deploy default system vm

2014-01-02 Thread Saurav Lahiri
)? regards, On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Saurav Lahiri saurav.lah...@sungard.com wrote: Hi, I am currently looking into cloudstack-3471 , wiki link beolw. ( https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/API+to+extract+the+log+statements+by+jobid ). As part of it I

[DISCUSS][PROPOSAL]root admin api to deploy default system vm

2013-12-29 Thread Saurav Lahiri
Hi, I am currently looking into cloudstack-3471 , wiki link beolw. ( https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/API+to+extract+the+log+statements+by+jobid ). As part of it I was was planning on deploying and using default system vms to host the logstash+elasticsearch

Re: [DISCUSS](CLOUDSTACK-3471)Provide an API to extract the log statements of a given jobid

2013-12-17 Thread Saurav Lahiri
does not interact with other parts of ACS at all. If there was a way for a service to re-use the API layer, that would work? So, the LogSearchAsaService service would be exposed on say a different port, and run as a different app/service/servlet On 12/13/13 12:38 PM, Saurav Lahiri saurav.lah

Re: [DISCUSS](CLOUDSTACK-3471)Provide an API to extract the log statements of a given jobid

2013-12-13 Thread Saurav Lahiri
at 6:21 AM, Saurav Lahiri saurav.lah...@sungard.com wrote: saurav.lahiri is added

Re: [DISCUSS](CLOUDSTACK-3471)Provide an API to extract the log statements of a given jobid

2013-12-12 Thread Saurav Lahiri
...@sungard.com) Thanks Saurav On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Saurav Lahiri saurav.lah...@sungard.comwrote: All, This is to initiate discussion towards implementing an api to extract the log messages specific to a jobid. As has been described in the bug descrition as of cloudstack 4.3

Re: [HELP] query w.r.t to cloudstack-1047

2013-12-08 Thread Saurav Lahiri
. --Sanjay *From:* Saurav Lahiri [mailto:saurav.lah...@sungard.com] *Sent:* Thursday, December 5, 2013 3:53 PM *To:* dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Sanjay Tripathi *Subject:* [HELP] query w.r.t to cloudstack-1047 Hi Sanjay, I was looking at the changes that were done as part of [cloudstack

[HELP] query w.r.t to cloudstack-1047

2013-12-05 Thread Saurav Lahiri
Hi Sanjay, I was looking at the changes that were done as part of [cloudstack-1047 - tracking in logs using job id ]. From the defect history it appears that the change corresponded to setting job-id=[uuid]. Currently the changes dont appear to be there in the master in the

Need access to Jira

2013-11-12 Thread Saurav Lahiri
Hi, Can someone please grant me permission to add comments to Jira. I would like to share a couple of screen shots and api output for cloudstack-1889. Thanks Saurav

Re: Need access to Jira

2013-11-12 Thread Saurav Lahiri
Looks like I really dont need any additional permission to update comments. Have been able to update Jira. Thank you. Saurav On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Saurav Lahiri saurav.lah...@sungard.comwrote: Hi, Can someone please grant me permission to add comments to Jira. I would like

[DISCUSS] (CLOUDSTACK-1889)

2013-11-11 Thread Saurav Lahiri
All, I have a query with respect to this defect. With a build off the master it looks like the updateResourceCount api is returning the count of resources a user can use or create and that appears to be the documented behaviour for this api. Furthermore it appears that the UI is correctly