Congratulations Will!
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike [mailto:mike.tutkow...@netapp.com]
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 2:13 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; market...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Will Stevens as new
Good to have you back Murali :)
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Kishan Kavala [mailto:kishan.kav...@accelerite.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 3:03 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: introduction
Welcome back Murali!
-Original Message-
From: Abhinav Roy
Congratulations Rafael!
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Nitin Maharana [mailto:nitin.mahar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 12:39 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rafael Weingartner
Congrats Rafael.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at
Good luck and I hope the best for your new venture!
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2016 9:31 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: market...@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Quick
Congratulations Boris!
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: John Burwell [mailto:john.burw...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2015 4:42 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Boris Schrijver
Congrats, Boris.
---
John Burwell
Congratulations Erik!
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: John Burwell [mailto:john.burw...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2015 12:12 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Boris Schrijver
Subject: Re: New PMC member: Erik Weber
Congrats Erik.
---
John Burwell
Congratulations Daan!
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 6:07 AM
To: dev
Subject: new colleagues
Hello fellow stackers,
This to let you know that I just entered the building of Leaseweb, in order
to
it accordingly but maintain BVT
failures as blockers. I believe this should greatly help avoiding regressions.
That's all.
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 11:56 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Somesh Naidu
> To sum it up: it’s easy to sit-down and wait for other people to work on
> features/test/fixes.
Wilder - essentially are you saying these failures are due to a. Ramnath and
folks didn't contribute at the time and b. you did but weren't able to
completely nail it down?
Raja/Ramnath - would
> that said we should still work towards a test set that can function as the
So essentially, we are saying that the existing BVT isn't really a BVT and that
we have to come up with it. From a user/customer standpoint this doesn't
inspire confidence.
Anyway, is anybody willing to do this, as
From: Somesh Naidu
Sent: Saturday, September 5, 2015 12:45 AM
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
I wrote that article, it was for DB cleanup for 3.x version. I have updated it
here for latest versions and added more tables -
http://support.citrix.c
I wrote that article, it was for DB cleanup for 3.x version. I have updated it
here for latest versions and added more tables -
http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX200918.
I believe the error suggests that duplicate entries found when parsing records
in table user_statistics for network
+1
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Remi Bergsma [mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com]
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 10:26 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [PROPOSAL] Closing PRs older than 1 month and without activity
Hi all,
There are several PRs that are quite
Is this open for voting? Is there a workaround/quickfix for this?
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 4:53 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: VR remote access vpn not working in
Happy Birthday Cloudstack :)
@Daan - IIRC, Manuel moved the source code from sccs to git so all the commits,
since 2008 until this date, reflect his name :)
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Remi Bergsma [mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com]
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 7:48 AM
Congratulations Remi!
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 2:13 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Remi Bergsma joins the PMC
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
LS,
Today the
Blocker bugs
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:16 PM, Somesh Naidu
somesh.na...@citrix.com
wrote:
I would like to add that while the # of users affected is
definitely a major factor when ascertaining severity of an issue,
should we not consider the technical scope and/or use-case of a
defect
+1
I believe we are saying these branches will no longer have any future releases;
that they are technically EOM/EOL.
Regards,
Somesh
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2015 10:41 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL]
{should you be adding [DISCUSS] and/or [PROPOSAL] to the subject?}
+1
Definitely required. Improvements in description/function required for both the
API call itself and associated parameters. I am willing to help with the
content.
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Dave
regressions that would
hinder some users and as we could well decide that these are blockers
(and I think we should in *most* cases). they block users and not
necessarily a release.
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com wrote:
Daan,
I was using the term
the argument to
start this thread.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com
wrote:
Daan, that sounds perfect to me!
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2015 4:59 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re
+1
Categorizing an issue as blocker/showstopper should need some kind of
moderation. One possibility, voting and/or require approval from certain # of
PMCs. Alternately, this could also be left to the discretion of the RM.
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Raja Pullela
as a staging area for those issues.
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com wrote:
+1
Categorizing an issue as blocker/showstopper should need some kind of
moderation. One possibility, voting and/or require approval from certain # of
PMCs. Alternately
: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 5:52 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Revisit Process for creating Blocker bugs
Somesh, please see my replies in line;
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:31 PM, Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com wrote:
Daan,
While I have the same
+1
The FS LGTM.
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi [mailto:sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 2:11 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [PROPOSAL] Deploy user instance from VM snapshot
Hi all,
I am working on an enhancement
+1 agree
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 8:48 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Replacing Openswan ipsec with Strongswan ipsec
+1. The config formats are sometimes a little different,
: [Proposal] CoreOS support
+1
Can you clean that last of OS Type while you are it, last time I checked it
was really long with some outdated distros…
-sebastien
On Jul 22, 2015, at 4:35 PM, Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com wrote:
+1
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message
Couple of questions:
1. In case backup snapshot process fails then user will be provided with alert
that backup of snapshot fails.
What user action required if this happens? Or will the snapshot operation be
treated as failed marking the DB entry as error and removed from primary
storage?
2.
+1
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Ahmad [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 10:28 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Proposal] CoreOS support
+1 looking forward to this.
On Jul 22, 2015, at 1:14 PM, Kishan Kavala kishan.kav...@citrix.com
+1
Reasons:
1. Technically speaking, Apache Cloudstack never had version less than 4.0. But
even if they are considered they would be EOL'd at some point.
2. At some point the feature set disparity between version will make it really
complex to have direct upgrade paths.
3. As Daan mentioned,
Congratulations Karen!
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 4:44 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Karen Vuong
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Karen Voung as a new PMC member of CloudStack
Congrats
Congratulations Wilder!
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Rafael Fonseca [mailto:rsafons...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 1:43 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Wilder Rodrigues as a new PMC member of CloudStack
Well deserved indeed. Parabéns Wilder!
Sent from my
Congratulations Bruno!
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Remi Bergsma [mailto:r...@remi.nl]
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 8:48 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Bruno Demion aka Milamber
Congratulations Bruno!
Sent from my iPhone
On 08 Jun
Star Guo,
While I wasn't been able to have a look at the error/image you shared, I
believe the issue is due to the orphaned entries in the table
*storage_pool_host_ref*. Remove that and you should be good. Also make sure to
remove the entry in *op_host_capacity* for this storage pool.
Somesh
I believe the default network offering for Isolated Network
(DefaultIsolatedNetworkOfferingWithSourceNatService) does the same. So I guess
that may not be the problem.
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015
Congratulations Marco!
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 12:19 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer Marco Sinhoreli
Nice work Marco! Congrats.
2015-05-11 9:17 GMT-07:00 Karen
You could use Security Groups to achieve this.
Somesh
CloudPlatform Escalations
Citrix Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: anil lakineni [mailto:anilkumar459.lakin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 4:32 PM
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject:
CCP 4.2.x or 4.3.x and upgrading to 4.4.x
There is no such upgrade path.
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 10:35 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
Hi Rene,
Agree with Marcus. I believe the workaround to the issue pointed out by Rene
should be straightforward and could be documented.
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Marcus [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 11:23 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re:
Congratulations Remi!
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID
On May 2, 2015 4:31 PM, Remi Bergsma r...@remi.nl wrote:
Thanks all for the kind words :-) Looking forward to continue working with you
and making CloudStack even better!
Regards, Remi
On 01 May 2015, at 14:24, Pierre-Luc Dion
There may not be any specific KVM.HA configuration. What are you looking for?
Somesh
CloudPlatform Escalations
Citrix Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Budur Nagaraju [mailto:nbud...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 5:38 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: KVM HA
Prashant,
Looks like the doc you are referring to might be for older version. What
version of ACS are you using?
Somesh
CloudPlatform Escalations
Citrix Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Prashant s [mailto:opsrunb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2015 2:47 PM
To:
AFAIK, it does not. The global config is used by storage allocator. At the
moment, we do not use allocators for Secondary Storage.
Somesh
CloudPlatform Escalations
Citrix Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 30,
+ devs
Somesh
CloudPlatform Escalations
Citrix Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: mvs babu [mailto:mvsbabu0...@outlook.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 10:15 AM
To: cloudusersusers
Subject: CloudStack agent for HyperV
Hi All,
I am trying to build CloudStack Agent for HyperV
As a workaround, we could just update the permissions for the API in the
commands.properties to allow normal users to make that API call.
Default Contents:
usage commands
generateUsageRecords=1
*listUsageRecords=7*
listUsageTypes=1
Change it to:
usage commands
generateUsageRecords=1
Congratulations Funs!
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 12:45 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Funs Kessen
Nice work Funs! Congrats.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 8:27 AM,
Congratulations Gaurav!
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Gaurav Aradhye [mailto:gaurav.arad...@clogeny.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 8:08 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Gaurav Nandkumar Aradhye
Thanks Raja!
Regards,
Gaurav Aradhye
Yes, transactions are used and AFAIK, transaction level is set to READ COMMITED.
You would benefit from setting the logging level to TRACE to get more insight
as most of the logging at the DAO layer is set to TRACE.
Somesh
CloudPlatform Escalations
Citrix Systems, Inc.
-Original
It is true and I like the idea. I would just want to make sure the agent
footprint isn't too high. As opposed to CP/SS VM, we expect to be a lot more
VRs running in an environment.
Also, the recent VR aggregation, I believe ACS 4.5 has it, did reduce a lot of
that barbaric stuff so we are
AFAIK, it doesn't. VM stats are fetched from the hypervisor at specified
frequency and only exist in memory.
Somesh
CloudPlatform Escalations
Citrix Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Rafael Weingartner [mailto:rafaelweingart...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 10:08 AM
Congratulations Pierre-Yves!
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 5:31 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer Pierre-Yves Ritschard
Congrats Pierre-Yves!
-Original
Congratulation Rene!
Somesh
CloudPlatform Escalations
Citrix Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 5:31 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rene Moser
Congrats Rene!
Congratulations Rohit! Very well deserved!
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Francois Gaudreault [mailto:fgaudrea...@cloudops.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 11:44 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rohit Yadav as new PMC member of CloudStack
On
I believe so, since the VM's password (stored in the user_vm_details table)
needs to be encrypted using the new keys and I believe encryption is a one-way
hash.
Somesh
CloudPlatform Escalations
Citrix Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent:
Lucian,
These values get collected every minute (controlled by global config
vm.stats.interval) from the hypervisor.
These values do not seem to be persisted in DB. I guess there won't be a need
to reset these.
Somesh
CloudPlatform Escalations
Citrix Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
Lucian,
Not sure if you can get past that without destroying that network (or
manipulating the DB).
I am not sure if network restart with cleanup true releases the VR IP so you
probably could try that. If it does, then we'd have to figure how to avoid the
new IP getting chosen from the same
Raja,
I am not sure if your understanding on how templates work is correct.
You do not need to download a template to the primary storage. CS will do that
as required. Also, CS will clean-up templates from primary if no associated VMs
are running. This is expected behavior. The state of the
that can corroborate these concerns?
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: Somesh Naidu [mailto:somesh.na...@citrix.com]
Sent: 20 February 2015 18:31
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Network QoS (not bandwidth limiting)
I don't think we can. QoS in CS is mostly throttling traffic
That’s something from the DAO layer. From what I can see it's Element
Collection being used for persistence.
Alex, I believe, wrote that piece of code.
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42 AM
To:
Rafael,
What version of CS are you using? I have a 4.3 and a 4.5 environment with
XS/VMware/KVM hypervisors and on all of them, the system VMs are being created
on shared primary storage.
Can you check what storage type is set in the system offerings?
Regards,
Somesh
-Original
[mailto:rafaelweingart...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 1:55 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can System VMs be migrated?
Somesh Naidu,
I am using the 4.3.0 version.
I am using Xen hypervisor with XAPI (old XCP) packages over Debian 7.4
I did not understand what you mean
Did you verify the template you are launching the VM from is completely
downloaded and it's integrity.
-Original Message-
From: w...@landhightech.com [mailto:w...@landhightech.com]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2015 3:17 AM
To: dev
Subject: Can not add a new virtual instance by a template
Is there a volume state that reflects that it's being snapshotted? If not, how
would mgmt. server know if a subsequent request for snapshot for a volumes
arrives when one is already in progress for that same volume?
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski
This is what I see in 4.6 (code is recent as of yesterday):
http://i.imgur.com/ogZiZpT.png
Thanks!
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com
wrote:
I thought we did include the name both in the table and the UI, unless I
understood your query incorrectly,
mysql desc
date in order to have a good chance at clicking on the
right row in the table to get to the correct details page.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com
wrote:
Can you click on one of the snapshots and see what is the first field
being displayed?
-Original
I thought we did include the name both in the table and the UI, unless I
understood your query incorrectly,
mysql desc snapshots;
+--+-+--+-+-++
| Field| Type| Null | Key | Default | Extra
|
-Original Message-
From: Somesh Naidu [mailto:somesh.na...@citrix.com]
Sent: 05 January 2015 20:16
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Unable to add primary storage (SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_73NFS
mount
error [opterr=mount failed with return code 32
XS is unable to create the SR failing with the following error:
---
Caused by: SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_73NFS mount error [opterr=mount failed with
return code 32]
---
May be a problem with the NFS. Can you try manually creating a SR on XS using
this NFS or may be simply try to mount the NFS on XS and
/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2
\
4. -h kvm \
5. -F
this was on the docs. How about upgrading my cloudstack version to 4.4.
This whole thing happened in 4.3.
Thank you.
On 1 January 2015 at 01:39, Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com
wrote:
You mean
. Well both of my system vm's are running and it is
downloading the iso image. And i was able to ping them. The system vm
template i am using is for the version 4.3 cloudstack.
Thank you.
On 30 December 2014 at 23:59, Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com
wrote:
Mohamed,
The log snippet you
+1 for reverting. Would be interesting though to know the reason for why it was
changed.
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 8:38 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: New snapshot(s) text in GUI
+1 for reverting, looks
. 2Gb/s. Or just simply let them compete for
the traffic? In afraid secondary traffic my influence or completely
overweight primary traffic if no QoS implemented...
Sorry for borring you with details.
Thanks
Sent from Google Nexus 4
On Dec 26, 2014 11:51 PM, Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com
Mohamed,
The log snippet you have shared doesn't seem to be relevant to the concurrent
operation exception (can't see that exception stack).
The message that did catch my attention though is,
-
2014-12-31 05:25:07,972 DEBUG [c.c.s.s.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl]
(secstorage-1:ctx-463d2f57)
reach Primary storage network, through Management
network) ?
SSVM needs to reach Primary storage somehow...
Thx
On 30 December 2014 at 19:29, Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com wrote:
Sorry, I was out on holidays :)
I guess that should work. Just know that Primary traffic is hypervisor
I generally prefer to keep the storage traffic separate. Reason is that storage
performance (provision templates to primary, snapshots, copy templates, etc)
significantly impact end user experience. In addition, it also helps isolate
network issues when troubleshooting.
So I'd go for one of
design options - which crime to comit
Thanks Somesh, first option also seems most logical to me.
I guess you wouldn't consider doing nic bonding and then vlans with some
QoS based on vlans on switch level?
Thx again
Sent from Google Nexus 4
On Dec 26, 2014 9:48 PM, Somesh Naidu somesh.na
But i am unable to connect to the vm it says no route to host
I am guessing you mean SSVM here. Where are you trying to access the VM from
and using what IP?
-Original Message-
From: Mohamed Infaz [mailto:infaz...@cse.mrt.ac.lk]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 10:40 PM
To:
A quick workaround is to disable the zone before rebooting the host.
-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 4:16 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Reboot of single hypervisor in zone leads to management network
exhaustion
Heh
Besides the state of root volume is Destroy
What about the removed column for that volume? Does that have a date or it's
null?
Is it a bug or missing something?
It might be a bug if at some point the storage GC doesn't clean up this volume.
-Original Message-
From: Yitao Jiang
You should be able to replace the secondary storage. The procedure should be in
the administration guide.
You should be able to either provision additional storage to a zone or replace
the existing storage with a larger one.
-Original Message-
From: Logan Barfield
Try registering the template as Windows Server 2008 (without the R2) instead
and see if that fixes it.
-Original Message-
From: ilya musayev [mailto:ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 4:45 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Sateesh Chodapuneedi; Marcus
Try UserVmManagerImpl.java and VmwareResource.java.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 5:36 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: CloudStack and Windows 2008 R2 SCSI Disk Controller issue
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:20 PM, ilya musayev
Congratulations Sanjeev!
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 4:15 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: New Committer: Sanjeev Neelarapu
welcome Sanjeev and good luck.
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Rajani
83 matches
Mail list logo
