+ 1 (binding)
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 11:38 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.1.0
Hi All,
I've created a 4.1.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
vote:
problem in their CS setups
with VMWare? This probably affects ACS4.0 as well.
Looked in the logs and see no abnormalities.
CS picked 2 IP addressed from Public Networks I've defined for Storage VM. This
is a wrong behavior in my opinion.
Thanks
ilya
Also, I don't believe this is VMWare related, perhaps it affects KVM/XEN
implementations as well.
-Original Message-
From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 6:26 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ACS41][BUG] CS does honor use of Storage
From: Musayev, Ilya imusa...@webmd.net
Date:
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ACS41][BUG] CS does honor use of Storage IP space- Advanced
Network w/vSphere 5.x
Also, I don't believe this is VMWare related, perhaps it affects KVM/XEN
implementations as well.
-Original Message
Animesh
I personally believe 4 months cycle is too rapid and we need more time to Qa
and fix all issues.
I'm finding issues constantly that automated tests missed.
My opinion, we should release a stable product when it's ready, hopefully
following a 6 months cycle.
Regards
Ilya
Catalana.out on a lightly used demo ACS41 is 166mb in size in less than 2 weeks
old implementation running on centos6.3
How does log rotate work? Would anyone know if we are using Linux based log
rotate or some other engine?
Thanks
Ilya
Hi Chiradeep,
I've reposted the patch.
Thanks
ilya
-Original Message-
From: ilya musayev [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of ilya
musayev
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 7:03 PM
To: Chiradeep Vittal
Cc: ilya musayev; cloudstack
Subject: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2053
-
patches/systemvm/debian/config/root/userdata.sh e5d170b
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10594/diff/
Testing
---
4.1
Thanks,
ilya musayev
This is general linux and not CS related.
Remove the udev rule 70-persistent-net in /etc/udev/rules.d/
You MAC address is hardcoded and hence your eth0 does not come, this rule will
be recreated when OS and udev start.
From: Maurice Lawler [mailto:maurice.law...@me.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April
: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10594/diff/
Testing
---
4.1
Thanks,
ilya musayev
Chiradeep,
Since you may have been the original writer of this logic, I've made some
changes that should improve and fix some problems we've witnessed.
Please review and let me know if you see any issues.
Thanks
ilya
-Original Message-
From: ilya musayev [mailto:nore
this week.
Regards
ilya
-Original Message-
From: Jason Cadmus [mailto:jdcad...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 10:58 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DOC] Opening vncextras firewall ports in ESXi 5.1
What page on the wiki should I create my documentation
, etc..)
So while the config is helpful, in my opinion, it's not necessary.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Cadmus [mailto:jdcad...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 11:47 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DOC] Opening vncextras firewall ports in ESXi 5.1
Ilya
, for some reason metadata/meta-data Rewrite Rule is missing, I would like
to understand where the call is made and how $folder variable is set.
Thanks
ilya
for it in vm_data.sh
Hence we trying to understand - why its not added.
Ill dig more tomorrow, if you can explain the context behind vm_data.sh, whats
its for and why its executed - it would really speed up our debug efforts.
Thanks
Ilya
Original message
From: Chiradeep Vittal
I'd like to simplify the CS onboarding expirience even further by providing vm
images with CS pre-installed in appliance format (perhaps including system vms
as bundle and nfs preconfigured)
I can automate this process completely hands off with or without vagrant (not a
fan of vbox).
Im
is exclusively managed by CloudStack, in that case, we can invoke
vmware sdk API call for maintenance mode - which will be much faster than what
CS does at present moment - in sequence - one at a time.
Regards
ilya
-Original Message-
From: Francois Gaudreault (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org
.
Regards
ilya
-Original Message-
From: Francois Gaudreault (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 3:47 PM
To: cloudstack-iss...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1868) GetVmStatsCommand
throws NullPointerException with VMWare
This is great :)
-Original Message-
From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 12:40 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to dramatically reduce the build time:)
holy moly, thats a serious bash one liner.
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:18
Thanks Kelven.
-Original Message-
From: Kelven Yang [mailto:kelven.y...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 7:47 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VMWARE][ACS41] Network Usage with Shared Advanced Zone
is 0KB
On 4/3/13 4:03 PM, Musayev, Ilya imusa
Jessica
The hack/fix below applies only to 3.x and 4.0.
4.1 and 4.2 - no longer require this specific change
Regards
ilya
-Original Message-
From: Jessica Tomechak (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 9:44 PM
To: cloudstack-iss...@incubator.apache.org
it in serial.
Even if we can bump up the number of threads to 2, this will greatly increase
productivity.
Regards
ilya
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 10:30 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VMWARE]Any
-
From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 10:50 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VMWARE]Any way to allow concurrent operations?
Hi Chip,
Thanks for the feedback,
I'm well aware of that. But here is some food for thought.
I was running
mentioned, we need more concurrency.
Thanks
ilya
-Original Message-
From: Kelven Yang [mailto:kelven.y...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 1:27 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VMWARE]Any way to allow concurrent operations?
We don't use queue facility/concurrency
Chip,
It happened for me as well only once and cannot find a way to reproduce it.
Regards
ilya
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 3:52 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: CLOUDSTACK-1868: GetVmStatsCommand throws
the queue frees up.
Is there any possible method of allowing concurrent operations and not waiting
for job X to complete before another one executes?
Thanks
ilya
Justin
Read over your email, really liked the proposal - I think all of them are very
good and useful.
Please post the code if you need someone to test it.
Thanks
ilya
-Original Message-
From: Justin Grudzien [mailto:grudz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 11:51 PM
To: dev
will let the more knowledge developers make that call.
Regards
ilya
-Original Message-
From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 2:18 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS]VMware Open Source APIs
i agree, if there is feature
Congrats and welcome!
-Original Message-
From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 12:20 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: New committer: Geoff Higginbottom
Well deserved. Congrats Geoff...
-Original Message-
501 - 529 of 529 matches
Mail list logo
