Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1023#issuecomment-153605360
I upgraded an existing xenserver setup with the changes in this PR. (clear
the tags on xenserver and restarted the networks to recreated VRs with new
systemvm.iso
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1024#issuecomment-153371665
:+1: (code review only) good improvement.
A test case would have been nice.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1023#issuecomment-153372412
Thanks @wilderrodrigues I will test this tomorrow morning IST
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1023#issuecomment-153274765
did the following to test it on an existing XenServer setup (It has two
networks egress_allow with default egress allow and isolated2 with default
egress DENY
Github user karuturi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1019#discussion_r43605823
--- Diff:
plugins/network-elements/bigswitch/src/com/cloud/network/bigswitch/BigSwitchBcfApi.java
---
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ private void setHttpHeader
Github user karuturi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1019#discussion_r43612367
--- Diff:
plugins/network-elements/bigswitch/src/com/cloud/network/bigswitch/BigSwitchBcfApi.java
---
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ private void setHttpHeader
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/941#issuecomment-152971271
@kansal Can you address the localization concerns?
Also, if possible could you provide screenshots of the change?
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1019#issuecomment-152976291
though its beyond what this PR want to fix, maybe we could fix L403(hash ==
HASH_CONFLICT) and L406(hash != HASH_IGNORE) as well.
---
If your project is set
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/897#issuecomment-152993596
manually verified the fix.
Before the fix:
on list networks page, I see three api calls
1. list zones
2. list networks with SG groups
3. list
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/903#issuecomment-152994809
great find @nitin-maharana
manually tested the fix
In my setup, I had a vm with two nics
isolated1 - 10.1.1.14 - default
isolated 2
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1015#issuecomment-153003386
LGTM (code review. no tests executed)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1001#issuecomment-153004732
tested that all the english strings are loading fine and there are no JS/UI
issues observed.
:+1: LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user karuturi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1019#discussion_r43601287
--- Diff:
plugins/network-elements/bigswitch/src/com/cloud/network/bigswitch/BigSwitchBcfApi.java
---
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ private void setHttpHeader
Thats a good idea. I have seen other open source projects do it this way.
(example: netty project)
On demand build is a better way than doing for every commit change.
especially when the code reviews are going on or there is WIP, its not
intended to do a build on every commit or update. (The
Jenkins though unstable is right at what it does. That is, if its green,
the build works fine, there are no check style errors, there are no new
PMD/Findbugs errors etc.
On the other hand, Travis green/red doesnt say anything at the moment. It
can be red due to a timeout and sometimes its green
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1006#issuecomment-152493863
Manual Testing:
Before:
ssh_keypairs
```
mysql> select * from ssh_keypa
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/982#issuecomment-152497680
manually tested by upgrading an existing xenserver setup and force
reconnecting the host
Before
```
[root@rjn-xen65-host plugins]# ls -la /etc
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/961#issuecomment-152176166
Hi @k0zka are you saying it might be specific to tomcat6? Reverting the the
change works fine.
Do you think we should revert this until we find a solution
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/996#issuecomment-152148071
@wilderrodrigues can you clear browser cache (cmd +shift + del in firefox)
or reload the page without cache using shift+f5 and then try?
---
If your project
Done.
~Rajani
On 28-Oct-2015, at 11:41 am, Kshitij Kansal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can someone please give me permissions to assign bugs to myself in JIRA?
> Username: kansal
>
> Regards,
> --
> Kshitij Kansal
GitHub user karuturi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/996
[4.6] CLOUDSTACK-8984: VPC Network offerings tab missing from UI
This is a regression from commit af2f21894ce061faadc8cec29b901719303a29dc
added vpcofferings to the select list
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/961#issuecomment-151734282
@K0zka I have the same issue as @ustcweizhou no log, no error message. Just
a blank page
environment: management server running on centos 6.6 and tomcat
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/983#issuecomment-151773344
@borisroman
I started seeing below error messages on console and VR doesnt start. Is it
related to this change?
```
[ 480.108811] "echo 0 &g
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/894#issuecomment-151394435
code LGTM. Its a nice improvement to have. Since remi already ran the
tests, I am merging this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/980#issuecomment-151397659
I am running the tests for #980 and #983 together.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/983#issuecomment-151721874
LGTM.
All the tests in BVT tests pass. (I see some failures in scalevm and
deployvm from iso tests but, they are environment issues)
---
If your project
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/980#issuecomment-151721813
LGTM.
All the tests in BVT tests pass. (I see some failures in scalevm and
deployvm from iso tests but, they are environment issues)
---
If your project
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/962#issuecomment-151086437
@snuf @NuxRo KVMGuru and LXCGuru are defined at
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/server/resources/META-INF/cloudstack/server-compute/spring-server
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/860#issuecomment-151096712
3rd attempt. I hope it succeeds this time.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/860#issuecomment-151047752
@borisroman yes this is real :) . I think this might exist in 4.5 as well.
Haven't tested it there.
I rebased with the current master
---
If your project
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/954#issuecomment-150898083
copy-pasting mike's response from email (
http://markmail.org/message/bptis5kitr2chqcn ). looks like its still not
working for him with vmware-managed storage
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/954#issuecomment-150897664
I was concerned the code change is against the initial design and we may be
doing it without understanding all the implications. But, since we dont have
any better
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/849#issuecomment-151016206
@remibergsma thanks a lot for running the tests.. I rebased it with the
current master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
There might be a better but for simple js changes, I do the below and restart
jetty
$ cp ./ui/scripts/domains.js ./client/target/generated-webapp/scripts/domains.js
$ rm ./client/target/generated-webapp/scripts/domains.js.gz
$ cp ui/scripts/domains.js
ure you got the right type of server?" is listed again in the
> output.
>
> It seems VMwareGuru is invoked and it passes the CopyCommand on to the
> SSVM, which claims it doesn't support the command.
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Rajani
Mike,
Can you please test on PR https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/962?
It fixes this issue.
~Rajani
On 23-Oct-2015, at 7:29 am, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> I guess I should point out that my system VMs are all running on XenServer,
> but I don't think that
ailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [4.6] Can't create template or volume from snapshot
Hi Rajani,
Just checking to make sure this is the PR you intended. It looks related to
OVM3 only.
Thanks!
Mike
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Rajani Karuturi <rajani.karut...@citrix.com
> wro
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/962#issuecomment-150203517
Thanks for taking this up @snuf. I am out of office and will be able to
test it only on Monday.
@NuxRo Can you try this please?
---
If your project is set up
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/954#issuecomment-149889343
@NuxRo This is the exact value I used and which worked for me "Ovm3Guru"
Just a check, did you restart the Management Server after changing t
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/954#issuecomment-149880562
Which why I think the fix should be in ovm3hypervisorguru
-Original Message-
From: "ustcweizhou" <notificati...@github.com>
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/954#issuecomment-149880641
What value did you give? It should be ovm3guru
-Original Message-
From: "NuxRo" <notificati...@github.com>
Sent: â21-â
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/959#issuecomment-149880745
Agree.
-Original Message-
From: "Wilder Rodrigues" <notificati...@github.com>
Sent: â21-â10-â15 13:22
To: &q
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/954#issuecomment-149859553
after excluding ovm3 hypervisor using the "hypervisor.gurus.exclude" global
setting, template creation from snapshot on kvm is successful.
I don
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/959#issuecomment-149782673
The code concerns(incase of stop-start on a slow network and the changes of
outer while waiting infinitely) with it were not addressed.
I am ok with merging
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/934#issuecomment-148684942
I ran BVT tests on a setup with two xenserver 6.5. I didnt see any new
failures.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/934#issuecomment-148696476
Thanks @DaanHoogland and @NuxRo . I will merge this in sometime.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
GitHub user karuturi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/934
[4.6][BLOCKER] CLOUDSTACK-8923: Create storage network IP range failed
This is a regression from commit 0cd8c06f7dceaf999acf202862c5d1d580e7aa0e
try-with-resource used at
https
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/934#issuecomment-148346807
@NuxRo Can you test this please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user karuturi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/888#discussion_r42110792
--- Diff: packaging/centos7/cloud-management.service ---
@@ -15,22 +15,19 @@
# specific language governing permissions and limitations
# under
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/930#issuecomment-148299850
@bvbharatk I agree. That would help is handle the stop start case as well.
In addition if we could also make the outer while loop finite, that would
be good. ie
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/934#issuecomment-148597263
@NuxRo for the benefit of the next reviewer, can you please outline the
manual/automatic tests you executed?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/930#issuecomment-148077678
I think this issue is happening due to the outer while loops which got
introduced in commit 50d756e87d26f0ac86e7897505ad2747735c4d5c
The outer loop waits until
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/931#issuecomment-147990778
Thanks @wilderrodrigues. I will run the tests tomorrow.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/931#issuecomment-148048131
Hi @wilderrodrigues
I ran all the tests in smoke folder(BVT) on a setup with 2 xenserver 6.5
hosts in advanced zone.
All the tests passed except the below
GitHub user karuturi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/929
[4.7] CLOUDSTACK-8951: validation for config param
"remote.access.vpn.psk.length"
throwing error for value < 8 and value > 256
right now, 8, 256 are hardcoded in the c
GitHub user karuturi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/927
[4.7] secure and hidden config values are returned as plaintext string
secure and hidden config values are first unencrypted before returning
them in the api. This is not desired
GitHub user karuturi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/928
[4.7] CLOUDSTACK-8950 Hypervisor Parameter check is not performed for
registerTemplate and getUploadParamsForTemplate API's
Any string is allowed as hypervisor type from the api
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/923#issuecomment-147749011
thanks for running the tests @remibergsma
should we merge this PR since we have two reviews from @DaanHoogland and
@remibergsma ?
---
If your project is set
to knock off blockers in this week and create RC
next week.
~Rajani
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Rajani Karuturi <raj...@apache.org> wrote:
> (resending in plain text)
>
> Thanks Boris(@borisroman) for fixing 3 blockers.
>
> We now have 7 blockers for th
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/915#issuecomment-147193430
LGTM(code review).
As @remibergsma said on pr #912 this should be included in 4.6
since it already has two reviews with Daan testing it, I am going to merge
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-147289439
@pdion891 @remibergsma we already have a jenkins systemvm build which takes
git branch as parameter.
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/parameterized/job
Github user karuturi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/873#discussion_r41721892
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/StorageManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -1736,7 +1737,10 @@ public boolean
storagePoolHasEnoughSpace(List volumes
yes. they are in 4.6. merged from this pr
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/806
~Rajani
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Raja Pullela
wrote:
> Dustin, the changes to support VMWare 6.0 are in 4.6, I think. Can you
> test the latest build on 4.6 to see if it
Dont know about [1] and [2].
[3]: they are simple data disks 1GB virtual size created from cloudstack
and downloaded. they are used in tests for upload volume/template. We do
not have a location to share them. Below are the links from my dropbox
account.
Thanks Daan. thats nice!
Does it also show "in progress" state like travis?
~Rajani
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> H,
>
> As you have undoubtetly noticed the jobs at builds.a.o no longer comment in
> our PRs after they are done. They do however
Github user karuturi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/909#discussion_r41109279
--- Diff:
engine/orchestration/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachinePowerStateSyncImpl.java ---
@@ -111,7 +111,19 @@ private void processReport(long hostId
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/909#issuecomment-145423925
one minor comment. otherwise, LGTM (only did code review)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/909#issuecomment-145436050
I will merge this once travis is done.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/841#issuecomment-145255883
@wido we need another review. Also, since master is frozen, we cant push
this at the moment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user karuturi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/873#discussion_r40881830
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/StorageManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -1736,7 +1737,10 @@ public boolean
storagePoolHasEnoughSpace(List volumes
Github user karuturi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/901#discussion_r40881668
--- Diff: core/src/com/cloud/storage/template/QCOW2Processor.java ---
@@ -75,6 +76,16 @@ public FormatInfo process(String templatePath,
ImageFormat
ck-4.2-systemvm64
> 3.1M ./cloudstack-4.4-auto-marvin
> 334M ./package-rhel63-master-noredist
> 6.8M ./test-maintenance-operations-master
> 36G .
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion <pdion...@apache.org> wrote:
>> David, Do you think you could do another cleanup o
GitHub user karuturi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/901
CLOUDSTACK-8808: Successfully registered VHD template is downloaded again
due to missing virtualsize property in template.properties
We have multiple file processors to process different types
I agree with Raja. BVT test case failures should be treated as blockers. Once
the test issue is fixed, they might uncover new issues/regressions.
~Rajani
On 30-Sep-2015, at 2:32 pm, Raja Pullela wrote:
> The problem needs to be fixed - "have tested a solution that
As per the latest BVT reports, CLOUDSTACK-8876 should also be a blocker.
I am bumping the priority of it.
~Rajani
On 29-Sep-2015, at 5:06 pm, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> Just checking JIRA, we have 5 blockers for 4.6:
>
>
On the docs link you sent, at the bottom right, there is a link which says
“v:master”. clicking on it will show you a github edit link which is
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs/edit/master/rtd/source/networking/ovs-plugin.rst
you can edit online and “propose the change”(which would
so many if-else statements :)
I would prefer making zoneid optional and defaulting it to -1.
simple and clear.
~Rajani
On 26-Sep-2015, at 1:34 am, Boris Schrijver wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> We're using S3 and are facing the same issues.
>
> This would indeed be a very
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/885#issuecomment-143542706
code LGTM. I am facing some issues with my devcloud4 setup and hence
couldnt run tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/885#issuecomment-143543503
@anshul1886 without the new method, how do you ensure that
PowerStateUpdateTime is up to date for the vm? It may be a very old value and
can be a false alarm(same
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/887#issuecomment-143543557
Thanks for all the debugging and testing @remibergsma and @wilderrodrigues
looking forward to see a stable master once again..
---
If your project is set up
Thanks for the update rene.
Unfortunately I do not have a vmware setup to test.
I will do a code review tomorrow and run some tests on xen to make sure its
not breaking anything else
On శని., సెప్టెంబర్ 26, 2015 at 17:39 అపరాహ్న, Rene Moser <
m...@renemoser.net> wrote:
I discovered the race
public traffic blocked in vm created using
DefaultIsolatedNetworkOfferingWithSourceNatService Wilder Rodrigues
Rajani Karuturi
CLOUDSTACK-8697 Assign VPC Internal LB rule to a VM fails Wilder
Rodrigues Pavan Kumar Bandarupally
Once these are out of the way, we can start on first RC.
Let us
Hi Raja,
I think CLOUDSTACK-8905, CLOUDSTACK-8881 and CLOUDSTACK-8795 are all related.
Wilder, Can you comment?
~Rajani
On 24-Sep-2015, at 11:52 am, Raja Pullela wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Hopefully this will be the last Blocker on the VR functionality ?
>
> Can
@resmo I will find some time tomorrow to test this. Can you add steps to
test please? Or are they already available on the other pr?
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 19:39 PM, resmo wrote:
Github user resmo commented on the pull request:
tgoing public traffic blocked in vm created using
DefaultIsolatedNetworkOfferingWithSourceNatService
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8795>
Wilder Rodrigues
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=wilder.rodrigues>
Rajani
Karuturi
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/845#issuecomment-142520701
I am not merging this as I see a -1 from @wilderrodrigues
@wilderrodrigues, unittests are added and steps to test are also available.
Can you review again
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/845#issuecomment-142520584
Tested this on a xenserver 6.5 setup. delete host/storage
pool/cluster/pod/network/zone are all successful.
:+1:
---
If your project is set up
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/875#issuecomment-142807954
:+1: merging..
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Hi David,
disk space issue again. Can you please do a little more cleanup?
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/computer/coohq-slave-01/executors/0/causeOfDeath
~Rajani
On 18-Sep-2015, at 11:59 pm, David Nalley wrote:
> I freed up a little bit of space, but we'll have to do
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/875#issuecomment-142487306
I faced the same issue and using bento/centos6.7 fixed it.
:+1: tested only in advanced
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/863#issuecomment-142491036
I tested this using redhat 6.3 as KVM hypervisor
host is in UP state after stop/start of management server
Force reconnect of the host also worked
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/863#issuecomment-142499721
ok. merging now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Hi PL,
I added Patrick to the contributors list.
I also added you to the PMC list on jira.
~Rajani
On 23-Sep-2015, at 3:59 am, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
> Thanks guys for the quick response. Ill recheck but I didn't had such a
> great karma when we look at it earlier today.
GitHub user karuturi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/873
CLOUDSTACK-8896: allocated percentage of storage pool going beyond 100%
This issue occurs when a volume in Ready state is moved across storage
pools.
While finding if the storage
GitHub user karuturi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/860
CLOUDSTACK-8889: delete volume doesnt decrement primary store resource count
Primary Storage count for an account does not decrease when a Data Disk
is deleted belonging to the account
Github user karuturi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/849#discussion_r39960628
--- Diff: api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/context/CallContext.java ---
@@ -90,7 +90,13 @@ public void putContextParameter(Object key, Object
value
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/841#issuecomment-141880230
I will change the default value to 10
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user karuturi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/857
Cloudstack-8885 added blocked connection listener for rabbitmqeventbus
When rabbitmq connections are blocked(for example when rabbitmq is
server is out of space), all the cloudstack
GitHub user karuturi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/849
Cloudstack-8816 some of the events do not have resource uuids
The key objects in the context map are sometimes String and sometimes
object. This causes missing uuids when an entity put
Hi all,
There is little progress on 4.6 blockers this week. To release 4.6, we all
should come together and fix the blockers. In recent days, master has
broken multiple times with compilation failures/regressions. If master
breaks, time spent on figuring out what happened and fixing it is time
501 - 600 of 1399 matches
Mail list logo