---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19022/#review36764
---
On March 11, 2014, 6:29 a.m., Koushik Das wrote
that isn't hurtful but an empty ids
when no id is given is not checked!
Koushik Das wrote:
I haven't removed 'id' due to back-compat. As I have mentioned 'id' and
'ids' are mutually exclusive. Also it is a valid scenario to not pass any of
id or ids.
daan Hoogland wrote:
ok, I
I am seeing the following exception
ERROR [c.c.a.ApiServer] (38419149@qtp-1917357200-11:ctx-116b8207 ctx-9a54f764)
unhandled exception executing api command: [Ljava.lang.String;@36d30b1d
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
This is a new install using master. So this is not about db changes but mostly
a bug.
On 10-Mar-2014, at 9:58 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
Mike has sent out several emails about the DB changes he made.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 5:28 AM, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote:
I am
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18352/#review36215
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On March 5, 2014, 8:50 a.m
Before doing a git pull, I generally check the sql schema changes and run the
delta manually on my existing setup. In most of the cases that works for me
without having to redeploy the db.
-Koushik
On 06-Mar-2014, at 11:43 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
Yeah, I
- Koushik Das
On March 4, 2014, 5:55 a.m., Rajani Karuturi wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18616/
---
(Updated
- Koushik Das
On March 4, 2014, 5:56 a.m., Rajani Karuturi wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18680/
---
(Updated
The primary storage needs to be put in maintenance before doing any
upgrade/reboot as mentioned in the previous mails.
-Koushik
On 03-Mar-2014, at 6:07 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, please note that in the bug you referenced it doesn't have a
problem with the reboot being
I am facing a build failure but for a different reason on 4.3-forward. Looks
like due to
commit 065ac54bd7755cb44667c71311293c8f2110b3f3
Author: tuna ng.t...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Mar 1 11:36:27 2014 +0700
CLOUDSTACK-6162: add UI for OVS plugin
[INFO]
as in orchestrateStart()
- Koushik Das
On Feb. 27, 2014, 12:35 p.m., Sanjay Tripathi wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17889
for null host id? Make it long instead of Long.
- Koushik Das
On Feb. 21, 2014, 11:36 a.m., Saksham Srivastava wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18352
For XS this works as expected.
For system VMs (SSVM, CPVM) there is a monitoring thread to check if they are
up and running. If not then it tries to bring them up. Now if there is no PS
available then the deployment fails and it is tried again. This is expected.
-Koushik
On 15-Feb-2014, at
Please add more details for upgrade scenario. Also can you give some examples
as to how the capacity computation is done for operations where the volume gets
migrated from one PS to another having different over provisioning factors.
Is there any value add if you give this also at cluster
, as this is the most used parameter :)
I can see that several existing commands - archive/deleteAlerts are
using ApiConstants.IDs parameter. We can mark IDs as deprecated, so
its no longer used by new commands.
-Alena.
On 2/7/14, 11:03 AM, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote:
Good point Min
parameter can
be one or more.
Thanks
-min
On 2/6/14 3:24 AM, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote:
Yes it will be like a findByIds() and the one id case is just a special
case for this.
On 06-Feb-2014, at 4:24 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
looks
the similar convention, id parameter can
be one or more.
Thanks
-min
On 2/6/14 3:24 AM, Koushik Das
koushik@citrix.commailto:koushik@citrix.com wrote:
Yes it will be like a findByIds() and the one id case is just a
special case for this.
On 06-Feb-2014, at 4:24 PM, Daan Hoogland
daan.hoogl
Currently list VM can only be called using a single VM ID. So if there is a
need to query a set of VMs using ID then either multiple list VM calls need to
be made or all VMs needs to be fetched and then do a client side filtering.
Both approaches are sub-optimal - the former results in multiple
, Abhinandan Prateek
abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com wrote:
+1, The listVM call is one of the most resource intensive call. Any step
to optimise it are welcome.
On 06/02/14 2:01 pm, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote:
Currently list VM can only be called using a single VM ID. So
As I understand this is a best-effort approach. Even if the proposed API
returns YES, deployment may still fail. I personally feel that it is better to
improve the deployVM API itself to return accurate error message rather than
having multiple API calls. If the deployvm call call fails, it
I noticed that VM instance view is broken in UI. It works fine in 4.3 branch.
It worked till commit d31fa09c7e5bb04fcc4594c0352d9b91171e9d1a.
-Koushik
The only UI related commit I see is 81a83b5b31f0a237ae56449c60350160915f28f8.
List VM API is working fine.
On 27-Jan-2014, at 2:26 PM, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote:
I noticed that VM instance view is broken in UI. It works fine in 4.3 branch.
It worked till commit
Animesh,
Please cherry-pick the following commit to 4.3
Commit 3fae917ebefb56ba280c2e6c5b6ff0f1720d46ed in branch
refs/heads/4.3-forward from Koushik
Dashttps://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=koushikd
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=3fae917 ]
master - f999a01837e60f0c51ef0eb4ad19c29e43ca3037
- Koushik Das
On Jan. 23, 2014, 10:27 a.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17233
Some questions:
- Is there a concept of generic permission (any action, any resource etc.)?
There shouldn't be a need to define hundreds of explicit permissions for admin
account.
- I think it would be good to have a notion of parent policy. This will avoid
duplication of permissions.
- Can
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16732/#review31367
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On Jan. 8, 2014, 9:43 a.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16566/#review31029
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On Jan. 2, 2014, 10:20 a.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16566/#review31030
---
Patch doesn't apply on master.
- Koushik Das
On Jan. 2, 2014, 10
What is the account creation logic on Solidfire SAN if you try to create the
same simultaneously? I am assuming there should be some unique constraint like
account name/id etc. Try to see if this can be utilised so that one of the
account creation call fails with appropriate error/exception.
Yes that is the current behaviour. All hosts in a cluster should be owned by a
single MS. In case when agent load balancing is enabled (agent.lb is set to
true), this constraint no longer holds and the hosts in a cluster may get split
across multiple MS.
If you look at the 'host' table there is
/
---
(Updated Dec. 19, 2013, 10:43 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Koushik Das.
Bugs: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5457
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5457
Repository: cloudstack-git
For now I have removed cpu, ram and cpu speed fields from vm_instance table.
On 18-Dec-2013, at 6:22 AM, Prachi Damle prachi.da...@citrix.com wrote:
Koushik,
My comments inline.
Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Koushik Das
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 4:06 AM
To: Prachi
- Koushik Das
On Dec. 17, 2013, 9:38 a.m., bharat kumar wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16315/
---
(Updated Dec. 17
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16315/#review30529
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On Dec. 17, 2013, 11:58 a.m
Prachi, From the history I see that you added VMEntityVO. Any specific reason
for having both?
On 12-Dec-2013, at 2:36 PM, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote:
I see that both the VOs uses the same vm_instance table. What is the need for
having 2 VOs for the same table? Should one
I see that both the VOs uses the same vm_instance table. What is the need for
having 2 VOs for the same table? Should one be removed?
Also VMEntityVO I see a field called speed which is not there in
VMInstanceVO. Why this discrepancy?
Thanks,
Koushik
/#comment57658
In an existing 4.2/master setup I see that the component of both
vmsnapshot.create.wait and vmsnapshot.max is set to none.
Handle this scenario as well.
- Koushik Das
On Dec. 9, 2013, 1:17 p.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote
Dec. 10, 2013, 10:55 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Das.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5419
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5419
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
---
CLOUDSTACK-5419: missing parameters in configuration table and to remove
I see that for XS the location of script files in the host has changed from
/opt/xensource/bin to /opt/cloud/bin. On latest master branch I see that the
scripts are still getting placed in the old location while adding a host. Is
there any commit missed out on master?
-Koushik
On 10-Dec-2013,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15763/#review29870
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On Dec. 5, 2013, 3:28 p.m
On Dec. 6, 2013, 4:19 a.m., Koushik Das wrote:
Ship It!
master - 88f64b2b93a3898e7868e9e55c1feca57b2ed48e
- Koushik
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15763/#review29870
in VirtualMachineManager.java
where ExecuteInSequence is defined.
- Koushik Das
On Nov. 21, 2013, 6:39 p.m., Alex Ough wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15763
I have posted my review comments. Except for a few minor comments changes look
good to me.
-Koushik
On 02-Dec-2013, at 9:15 PM, Alex Ough alex.o...@sungard.com wrote:
All,
It's been a while since this review was requested, so can anyone review
this to move on?
Thanks in advance.
Alex
On Dec. 3, 2013, 8:44 a.m., Koushik Das wrote:
core/src/com/cloud/agent/api/MigrateCommand.java, line 32
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15763/diff/1/?file=389559#file389559line32
I see that you have tested for XS. In the mail thread people have
mentioned that it should work
is not showing up. Also
there are 2 commits in the patch file. Can you resubmit the patch with only a
single commit?
- Koushik Das
On Dec. 3, 2013, 5:07 p.m., Alex Ough wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https
- Koushik Das
On Nov. 29, 2013, 7:46 a.m., bharat kumar wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15832/
---
(Updated Nov. 29
, 2013, 12:35 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Das.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5161
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5161
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
---
enable scaling of a vm using custom offering
CLOUDSTACK-5161
Diffs
For using system VMs on local storage there is a global setting
system.vm.use.local.storage which needs to be set to true.
-Koushik
On 29-Nov-2013, at 7:47 PM, Antonio Petrocelli a.petroce...@netsons.com wrote:
Hello,
we want use cloudstack 4.2 with local storage + VMware 5.1.
/#comment56781
Put some comment to explain the logic
server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15832/#comment56784
I see the usage event publishing code getting repeated. Move them to a
separate method.
- Koushik Das
On Nov. 27, 2013, 9:33 a.m., bharat
don't think VM
HA can be done with hypervisor HA because of this.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.comhttp://citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 10:51 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] User
- Koushik Das
On Nov. 26, 2013, 8:42 a.m., bharat kumar wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15505/
---
(Updated Nov. 26
- Koushik Das
On Nov. 26, 2013, 11:28 a.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15834/
---
(Updated
On Nov. 26, 2013, 9:12 a.m., Koushik Das wrote:
master - ef40e156ed376968fa9fd15078034d54b97deecc
4.3 - 6af8021ef7188b8f2d92bc891b5108f0e3503284
- Koushik
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https
On Nov. 26, 2013, 11:58 a.m., Koushik Das wrote:
master - b2f0a0bce26e342f18da42a51ae19d51c238a762
4.3 - 8970c9515441c50a0249b9624b120d4e5348b5af
- Koushik
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https
.
Other folks: please read the entire thread and the links from Koushik;
there's a planned deprecation here.
--David
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 2:38 AM, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com
wrote:
Thanks for the comments David. See inline.
-Koushik
On 22-Nov-2013, at 7:31 PM, David Nalley da
going forward. For the next release both options will
be there. Maybe post that the custom HA solution can be removed for XS 6.2 and
above.
--David
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote:
Initial draft of the FS
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence
Initial draft of the FS
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/User+VM+HA+using+native+XS+HA+capabilities
-Koushik
On 21-Nov-2013, at 9:59 AM, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote:
Cloudstack relies on custom HA logic for user VMs running on Xenserver. The
reason
Cloudstack relies on custom HA logic for user VMs running on Xenserver. The
reason for doing it like this may be due the fact that native HA capabilities
in XS was not mature enough during the initial days. Also in the custom HA
logic, Cloudstack has to correctly determine the state of a VM
I have reverted the same in 4.3 as well
commit f84b729eb01ffc7cae1e210b58f80ff2033ad785
Author: Koushik Das kous...@apache.org
Date: Fri Nov 15 12:59:48 2013 +0530
Revert CLOUDSTACK-5176:
This reverts commit f29c7188ba03f1997238d50f8a11857e94fe4b55.
On 15-Nov-2013, at 10:35 AM
://reviews.apache.org/r/15507/#comment55923
Is there any other changes in this file? If not remove it.
framework/config/src/org/apache/cloudstack/framework/config/impl/ConfigDepotImpl.java
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15507/#comment55924
this is not required
- Koushik Das
On Nov. 14, 2013, 7:36
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15507/#review28947
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On Nov. 14, 2013, 9:25 a.m
Congrats Sanjeev
On 14-Nov-2013, at 11:29 AM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Sanjeev
Neelarapu to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have
accepted.
Being a committer allows many
I see the JCE extensions in jdk 1.7 as well. They are present under
java_home/jre/lib/security. But still I see a test failure. Is there any
other configuration that is required?
Running org.apache.cloudstack.network.lb.CertServiceTest
Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time
();
On 12-Nov-2013, at 11:35 AM, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote:
I see the JCE extensions in jdk 1.7 as well. They are present under
java_home/jre/lib/security. But still I see a test failure. Is there any
other configuration that is required?
Running
- 6a8ec786ad2a843768c26099e17f89782cd77f75
- Koushik Das
On Nov. 8, 2013, 12:24 p.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15348
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15348/#review28538
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On Nov. 8, 2013, 12:02 p.m
Is your data volume and VM on the same host? If not then the volume cannot be
attached to the VM in case of a local volume.
-Koushik
On 07-Nov-2013, at 4:03 PM, Antonio Petrocelli a.petroce...@netsons.com
wrote:
Hello,
i've this error when i try to attach a volume to vm:
Failed to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15173/#review28355
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On Nov. 7, 2013, 6:24 a.m
On Nov. 7, 2013, 7:17 a.m., Koushik Das wrote:
Ship It!
commit 7095ea2b5e497620c8c879517565046e3b46e493
- Koushik
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15173/#review28355
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15018/#review28183
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On Nov. 5, 2013, 10:34 a.m
Again this is not required
engine/schema/src/com/cloud/service/dao/ServiceOfferingDaoImpl.java
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15173/#comment54674
ordering of parameter is not correct. optional parameters should be at the
end
- Koushik Das
On Nov. 1, 2013, 5:40 a.m., bharat kumar
://reviews.apache.org/r/15018/#comment54681
Simply drop and recreate the view
- Koushik Das
On Oct. 31, 2013, 10:14 a.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https
Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4944 to track this
issue.
Alex, Any reason for adding requests based on sequence and not doing FIFO? Do
you see any issues if request always gets added to the end of the queue?
On 23-Oct-2013, at 6:26 PM, Koushik Das koushik
look here. I think when commands originate from the
management server, it doesn't go through this code. This is if the command
came from the agent which doesn't matter if there's multiple management
servers.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Koushik Das
Sent: Thursday, October
Congrats Talluri!
On 23-Oct-2013, at 4:07 PM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
Srikanteswara
Talluri to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have
accepted.
Being a committer allows many
Congrats Sowmya!
On 23-Oct-2013, at 4:16 PM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Sowmya
Krishnan to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have
accepted.
Being a committer allows many
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14305/#review27250
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On Oct. 21, 2013, 5:14 a.m
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14305/#comment52933
Why this is changed to protected?
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/SSHKeyPairResponse.java
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14305/#comment52934
Protected? This is not required
- Koushik Das
On Oct. 18, 2013, 12:43 p.m
Agree with Marcus here.
If we are planning to rewrite, I think that there should be some discussion
around the possibility of making it a direct agent like XS/Vmware. If this is
possible then installing the KVM agent on individual hosts will be eliminated.
On 17-Oct-2013, at 8:49 PM, Marcus
, at 3:21 AM, Prachi Damle
prachi.da...@citrix.commailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.comhttp://citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 5:21 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re
is the latter where there is no pools in the allocator avoid set. So as
you suggested in this case as well the cluster needs to be in avoid set.
Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 9:23 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
On 16-Oct-2013, at 3:12 AM, Prachi Damle prachi.da...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 11:43 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Possible bug in DeploymentPlanner?
Thanks
this,
that needs to be fixed.
Also, I do think in general it will be safe to add a configurable retry limit
on this loop to have control in case any new logic in allocators don't follow
this reasoning. I will add that limit.
Thanks,
Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Koushik
Views are meant to be read only. So +1 for removing setters.
On 04-Oct-2013, at 10:59 PM, SuichII, Christopher chris.su...@netapp.com
wrote:
*JoinVOs are used to store entries from MySQL views, which are not editable.
I think removing setters from the *JoinVOs may help avoid some potential
for your reply, but unfortunately, this setting does NOT cover
'MigrateCommand'.
As you specified, it seems to be effective only in Start/Stop/CopyCommand.
So can we include 'MigrateCommand' in that setting?
Thanks
Alex Ough
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Koushik Das koushik
It is already a global setting in 4.2. The name of the setting is
execute.in.sequence.hypervisor.commands.
Check out Config.java
ExecuteInSequence(Advanced, ManagementServer.class, Boolean.class,
execute.in.sequence.hypervisor.commands, true, If set to true,
StartCommand, StopCommand,
Hi Steve,
Welcome to CloudStack. Looking forward to working with you.
On 02-Oct-2013, at 6:10 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
Welcome Steve!
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Steve Wilson steve.wil...@citrix.comwrote:
Hi Everyone,
I just wanted to take a second
I think it is important to identify what is exclusively for Cloudstack and what
all can be reused across multiple services.
1. Authentication - Typically enterprises/service providers would like to reuse
their existing authentication systems. So an easy mechanism needs to be
provided for
Ilya,
Can you check in the MS logs if more than one thread tries to process connect
for the same host simultaneously? In case of XS I had seen that there is a
possibility of the vm states getting incorrectly determined (during vm sync) in
case more than one thread tries to process connect to
Currently the way Cloudstack deals with PS failure is to reboot all hosts
associated with the cluster. Selectively cleaning up the affected VMs would
have been the best option, but since issues were seen with stopping VMs on the
hypervisors (at least in Xenserver 5.6 [1]) reboot was the next
Congrats Dave!
On 07-Sep-2013, at 7:50 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has asked Dave Cahill to become a committer and we are pleased
to announce that he has accepted.
Dave has been an active member of the
Congrats Daan!
On 28-Aug-2013, at 7:28 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has asked Daan Hoogland to become a committer and we are pleased to
announce that he has accepted!
Daan's been quite active on the dev
Congrats Ian!
On 28-Aug-2013, at 12:42 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has asked Ian Duffy to become a committer and we are pleased
to announce that he has accepted.
Being a committer enables easier contribution to
Recently I worked on some performance related issues and noticed a pattern in
the code that lead to increased latency for some APIs in a scaled up
environment ( 10K user VMs, 10K hosts). The pattern is like this:
ListHost hosts = listHosts(); // based on some filter
for (Host h : hosts) {
During MS restart as part of host connect, vm sync happens. This may be
stopping VMs if there is a mismatch in actual state and what is present in the
database. Do you see anything useful in the MS logs?
-Koushik
On 27-Aug-2013, at 4:20 AM, Musayev, Ilya imusa...@webmd.net wrote:
I've been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13842/#review25612
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On Aug. 27, 2013, 10:53 a.m
In 4.2 branch it gets initialized from config property
storage.max.volume.size.
Storage DEFAULT management-server storage.max.volume.size 2000The
maximum size for a volume (in GB).
Which branch are you in? Master. Maybe some missing commit in master.
-Original Message-
Congrats Toshiaki!
On 20-Aug-2013, at 4:26 AM, Marcus Sorensen
shadow...@gmail.commailto:shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
Toshiaki
that is checking if the network is already
implemented or shutdowned outside the lock.
Diffs
-
server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkManagerImpl.java 68b1b4f
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13627/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Koushik Das
.
As part of the fix moved out code that is checking if the network is already
implemented or shutdowned outside the lock.
Diffs (updated)
-
server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkManagerImpl.java 68b1b4f
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13627/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Koushik Das
701 - 800 of 872 matches
Mail list logo
