Re: Review Request 28611: CLOUDSTACK-8007: Fixed the script 'test_vm_passwdenabled.py' - Template created by Admin should have public access to be used for regular User VM Deployment

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28611/#review63866 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sangeetha hariharan On Dec. 2, 2014, 10:40

Re: Review Request 28579: CLOUDSTACK-7996: Fixed the script test_tags.py - Tags and Template should belong to the User Account to test the case

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28579/#review63580 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sangeetha hariharan On Dec. 1, 2014, 10:35

Re: Review Request 28489: CLOUDSTACK-7978 : Fixed the script 'test_egress_rules.py' - Zone Network Type Information should to be passed to VirtualMachine create method

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28489/#review63164 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sangeetha hariharan On Nov. 27, 2014, 12:09

Re: Review Request 28490: CLOUDSTACK-7979 : Fixed the script 'test_security_groups.py' - Zone Network Type Information should to be passed to VirtualMachine create method

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28490/#review63165 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sangeetha hariharan On Nov. 27, 2014, 12:14

Re: Review Request 28492: CLOUDSTACK-7980 : Fixed the script '/maint/test_egress_rules_host_maintenance.py' - Zone Network Type Information should to be passed to VirtualMachine create method

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28492/#review63166 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sangeetha hariharan On Nov. 27, 2014, 12:19

Re: Review Request 28292: CLOUDSTACK-7955 : Fixed the script 'test_project_limits.py' - Register Template in the Project to test the Template limits on the project

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28292/#review62647 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sangeetha hariharan On Nov. 20, 2014, 7:26

Re: Review Request 28300: CLOUDSTACK-7956 : Fixed the script 'test_project_usage.py' - Register Template in the Project to test the Template limits on the project

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28300/#review62649 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sangeetha hariharan On Nov. 20, 2014, 9:49

Re: Review Request 28179: CLOUDSTACK-7928 : Fixed the script 'test_vpc_vm_life_cycle.py' - Removed the Invalid test cases for Stopped VPC VR Scenario

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28179/#review62071 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sangeetha hariharan On Nov. 18, 2014, 5:47

Re: Review Request 27305: CLOUDSTACK-7810 : Fixed the script test_vpc_vm_life_cycle.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27305/#review61829 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sangeetha hariharan On Nov. 15, 2014, 11:04

Re: Review Request 27845: CLOUDSTACK-7876 - Fixed the script 'test_vpc_vm_life_cycle.py' - Prevent Destruction of VM before it can be recovered

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27845/#review60818 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sangeetha hariharan On Nov. 10, 2014, 11:47

Re: Review Request 27307: CLOUDSTACK-7811 : Fixed the script test_persistent_networks.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27307/#review58929 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sangeetha hariharan On Oct. 28, 2014, 8:50

Re: Review Request 27308: CLOUDSTACK-7812 : Fixed the script maint/test_redundant_router_network_rules.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27308/#review58931 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sangeetha hariharan On Oct. 28, 2014, 8:55

Re: Review Request 27195: CLOUDSTACK-7788: Fixed the script test_escalations_instances.py - Regular Users should not use expunge parameter for destroying a VM

config parameters? - sangeetha hariharan On Oct. 25, 2014, 2:59 p.m., Chandan Purushothama wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27195

Re: Review Request 27193: CLOUDSTACK-7788: Fixed the script 'test_dynamic_compute_offering.py' to be run only on hardware

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27193/#review58512 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sangeetha hariharan On Oct. 25, 2014, 2:38

Re: Review Request 27193: CLOUDSTACK-7788: Fixed the script 'test_dynamic_compute_offering.py' to be run only on hardware

On Oct. 25, 2014, 4:16 p.m., sangeetha hariharan wrote: Ship It! In this case, simulator does not support for scale operation which is the reason for the failures. Please log a ticket to have simulator support for this operation. - sangeetha

Re: Review Request 27192: CLOUDSTACK-7787: Fixed the script 'test_lb_secondary_ip.py' to be run only on hardware

to VMs for validation has been marked for not being picked up by simulator runs. - sangeetha hariharan On Oct. 25, 2014, 2:23 p.m., Chandan Purushothama wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https

Re: Review Request 27191: CLOUDSTACK-7786 : Fixed the script 'test_haproxy.py' to be run only on hardware

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27191/#review58516 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sangeetha hariharan On Oct. 25, 2014, 2:12

Re: Review Request 27191: CLOUDSTACK-7786 : Fixed the script 'test_haproxy.py' to be run only on hardware

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27191/#review58517 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sangeetha hariharan On Oct. 25, 2014, 2:12

Re: Review Request 27195: CLOUDSTACK-7788: Fixed the script test_escalations_instances.py - Regular Users should not use expunge parameter for destroying a VM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27195/#review58525 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sangeetha hariharan On Oct. 25, 2014, 6:50

Re: Review Request 27049: CLOUDSTACK-7769 - Fixed test_ssvm.py script

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27049/#review57878 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sangeetha hariharan On Oct. 22, 2014, 7:19

Review Request 27000: CLOUDSTACK-7762 -[Automation] - Fix test failure for test_02_revert_vm_snapshots in smoke/test_vm_snapshots.py

=== ok -- Ran 3 tests in 795.005s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Review Request 25841: CLOUDSTACK-7587 - Automation - Add simulator_only attribute to acl related test cases.

for the acl related test suites , not test case gets executed. Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Review Request 25796: CLOUDSTACK-7585 - Automation - Fix test_acl_sharednetwork.py and test_acl_sharednetwork_deployVM-impersonation.py to pick Shared Network network offering when creating networks

-impersonation | 7 | +-+--+-+ Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request 25518: CLOUDSTACK-7035-[Automation] - Automate ACL test cases relating to listNetworks() for isolated and shared networks.

- ROOT admin - Not able to list network owned by accounts under any domain by passing uuid. Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request 25749: Fixed CLOUDSTACK-7573: ISO Guest OS Change

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25749/#review53756 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sangeetha hariharan On Sept. 17, 2014, 7:28

Review Request 25722: CLOUDSTACK-7567 - Automate ACL test cases relating to depoying VM in shared network with different scopes - All/Domain/Domain with subdomain/Account for Admin, domain admin and r

-- Ran 28 tests in 125.258s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request 22713: This Test suite has test cases for deploying Virtual Machine using impersonation (passing account and domainId parameters) for shared network

(integration.component.test_acl_sharednetwork_deployVM-impersonation.TestSharedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_regularuser_scope_all_crossdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 51 tests in 197.482s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Review Request 25518: CLOUDSTACK-7035-[Automation] - Automate ACL test cases relating to listNetworks() for isolated and shared networks.

by accounts under any domain by passing uuid. Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request 22707: Test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for listSnapshot() with parameters - id, listall, isrecursive, account and domainid executed as ROOT admin, domain ad

, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request 22712: This Test suite has test cases relating to acess checks for deleteNetwork() for Admin, domain admin and regular users

-- Ran 10 tests in 61.766s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request 22712: This Test suite has test cases relating to acess checks for deleteNetwork() for Admin, domain admin and regular users

(integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork_delete.TestIsolatedNetworkDelete) ... === TestName: test_deleteNetwork_user_foruserinsamedomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 10 tests in 61.766s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request 22707: Test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for listSnapshot() with parameters - id, listall, isrecursive, account and domainid executed as ROOT admin, domain ad

: test_listSnapshot_by_id_as_user_snapshotfromsamedomaindifferentaccount | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 95 tests in 197.637s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request 22706: This test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for listVolume() with parameters - id, listall, isrecursive, account and domainid executed as ROOT admin, domain

-- Ran 95 tests in 139.480s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request 22705: Test cases relating to access checks for listVirtualMachine() with parameters - id, listall, isrecursive, account and domainid executed as ROOT admin, domain admin and regula

: test_listVM_by_id_as_user_vmsfromotherdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 95 tests in 134.796s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request 22705: Test cases relating to access checks for listVirtualMachine() with parameters - id, listall, isrecursive, account and domainid executed as ROOT admin, domain admin and regula

in 134.796s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request 22706: This test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for listVolume() with parameters - id, listall, isrecursive, account and domainid executed as ROOT admin, domain

-- Ran 95 tests in 139.480s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

RE: Snapshot partial file creates are not cleaned up.

Hi, Following are couple of issues that have been logged to track this issue: CLOUDSTACK-5395 - When backup snapshot fails because of backup.snapshot.wait time exceeding , the vhd entries form the primary store is not getting cleared. This bug was reopened to address - cleaning up of snapshot

Re: Review Request 22709: This test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for createNetwork(), deploying VM in an isolated network and restartNetwork() for Admin, domain admin and regula

-- Ran 28 tests in 129.477s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request 22709: This test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for createNetwork(), deploying VM in an isolated network and restartNetwork() for Admin, domain admin and regula

: test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_scope_domain_withsubdomainaccess_subdomainuser | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 28 tests in 129.477s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request 22709: This test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for createNetwork(), deploying VM in an isolated network and restartNetwork() for Admin, domain admin and regula

:28 a.m., sangeetha hariharan wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22709/ --- (Updated June 18, 2014, 1:28 a.m

Re: Review Request 22709: This test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for createNetwork(), deploying VM in an isolated network and restartNetwork() for Admin, domain admin and regula

(integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_30_restartNetwork_user_foruserinotherdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 33 tests in 256.713s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request 22709: This test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for createNetwork(), deploying VM in an isolated network and restartNetwork() for Admin, domain admin and regula

test_30_restartNetwork_user_foruserinotherdomain (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_30_restartNetwork_user_foruserinotherdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 33 tests in 256.713s OK Thanks, sangeetha

Review Request 22705: Test cases relating to access checks for listVirtualMachine() with parameters - id, listall, isrecursive, account and domainid executed as ROOT admin, domain admin and regular us

test_listVM_by_id_as_user_vmsfromotherdomain (integration.component.test_acl_listvm.TestVMList) ... === TestName: test_listVM_by_id_as_user_vmsfromotherdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 95 tests in 134.796s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Review Request 22706: This test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for listVolume() with parameters - id, listall, isrecursive, account and domainid executed as ROOT admin, domain adm

) ... === TestName: test_listVolume_by_id_as_user_volumefromsamedomaindifferentaccount | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 95 tests in 139.480s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request 22706: This test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for listVolume() with parameters - id, listall, isrecursive, account and domainid executed as ROOT admin, domain

(integration.component.test_acl_listvolume.TestVolumeList) ... === TestName: test_listVolume_by_id_as_user_volumefromsamedomaindifferentaccount | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 95 tests in 139.480s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Review Request 22707: Test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for listSnapshot() with parameters - id, listall, isrecursive, account and domainid executed as ROOT admin, domain admin

: test_listSnapshot_by_id_as_user_snapshotfromsamedomaindifferentaccount | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 95 tests in 197.637s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request 22707: Test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for listSnapshot() with parameters - id, listall, isrecursive, account and domainid executed as ROOT admin, domain ad

: test_listSnapshot_by_id_as_user_snapshotfromsamedomaindifferentaccount | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 95 tests in 197.637s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Review Request 22709: This test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for createNetwork(), deploying VM in an isolated network and restartNetwork() for Admin, domain admin and regular us

(integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_30_restartNetwork_user_foruserinotherdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 33 tests in 256.713s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Review Request 22712: This Test suite has test cases relating to acess checks for deleteNetwork() for Admin, domain admin and regular users

(integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork_delete.TestIsolatedNetworkDelete) ... === TestName: test_deleteNetwork_user_foruserinsamedomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 10 tests in 61.766s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Review Request 22713: This Test suite has test cases for deploying Virtual Machine using impersonation (passing account and domainId parameters) for shared network

: test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_regularuser_scope_all_crossdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 51 tests in 197.482s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

Nux, - I created an instance - I added a rule (ping) in the otherwise untouched default security group - I added a rule (ping) in the otherwise untouched default security group Result: I could not ping the instance In this case , is it possible that when you tried to ping the instance , the

RE: New Committer: Sanjeev Neelarapu

Congratulations Sanjeev! -Sangeetha -Original Message- From: Somesh Naidu [mailto:somesh.na...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 7:31 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: New Committer: Sanjeev Neelarapu Congratulations Sanjeev! Regards, Somesh -Original

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Krishnan, Sowmya

Congrats Sowmya! -Original Message- From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 8:43 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Krishnan, Sowmya Congrats Sowmya! On 23-Oct-2013, at 4:16 PM, Prasanna Santhanam

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Shilamkar, Girish

Congrats Girish!! -Original Message- From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 3:59 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Shilamkar, Girish Congratz, Girish -Original Message- From:

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Talluri, Srikanteswara

Congrats Talluri!! -Original Message- From: Suresh Sadhu [mailto:suresh.sa...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 4:16 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Talluri, Srikanteswara Congrats Talluri -Original Message- From: Sanjeev

Re: Review Request 14469: CLOUDSTACK-4637: Fix failures in test_egress_fw_rules.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14469/#review27163 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sangeetha hariharan On Oct. 16, 2013, 2:27

Re: Review Request 14469: CLOUDSTACK-4637: Fix failures in test_egress_fw_rules.py

is the default. create_vm() should be called with egress_policy=False , to match the changes that is done for expected_result. - sangeetha hariharan On Oct. 3, 2013, 2:33 p.m., Girish Shilamkar wrote: --- This is an automatically

RE: Connection Refused

You can try setting this global parameter- secstorage.allowed.internal.sites to allow for mirrors.liquidweb.com . Or , If you register the iso using the Ip address instead of mirrors.liquidweb.com , it should work as well. -Thanks Sangeetha -Original Message- From: Maurice Lawler

RE: Connection Refused

After changing the global variable , can you see if restarting the SSVM helps? -Thanks Sangeetha -Original Message- From: Maurice Lawler [mailto:maurice.law...@me.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 5:58 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Sangeetha Hariharan Subject: Re: Connection

RE: Security Groups

If you are using Xenserver hosts , can you make sure you have the CSP packages installed? -Thanks Sangeetha -Original Message- From: Michael Phillips [mailto:mphilli7...@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 9:33 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Security Groups I

RE: Creating an instance with ssh key pair

To deploy Vm using ssh key pairs you will need to use a template that has SSH Key Gen Scripts in it. Only then you will be able to ssh into the instance using ssh key. -Thanks Sangeetha -Original Message- From: Gaurav Aradhye [mailto:gaurav.arad...@clogeny.com] Sent: Thursday,

RE: Instructions to *consume* events in another region?

by cloudstack -Thanks Sangeetha --Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 1:31 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Instructions to *consume* events in another region? On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Sangeetha Hariharan

RE: Regions in 4.1

There is no UI support for regions in 4.1. All API calls relating to regions feature is implemented. Note that cloudstack does not do data sync between regions. There are few open issues relating to Regions and Event notifications: CLOUDSTACK-1673 - AWS Regions - Events - User disable / Domain

RE: event bus details

I had logged a similar bug where the UUID of the user that was disabled and the UUID of the domain that was deleted is not included: CLOUDSTACK-1673 - AWS Regions - Events - User disable / Domain Delete event does not include the UUID of the user/domain that was disabled. -Thanks Sangeetha

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sailaja Mada

Congratulations Sailaja!! -Original Message- From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 2:25 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sailaja Mada Woohooo, congrats Sailaja. On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Pranav Saxena

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Venkata Swamy

Congratulations Swamy. -Original Message- From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 2:33 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Venkata SwamyBabu Budumuru Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Venkata Swamy Venkata, congrats! On 5/23/13

RE: [VOTE] Move forward with 4.1 without a Xen-specific fix for CLOUDSTACK-2492?

Templates for IPV6 feature in 4.1 is different from the 4.2 templates. They are hosted here - http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/ as 4.1.0-experimental-ipv6-* . Also support was extended only for KVM and Xenserver. -Thanks Sangeetha -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen

RE: listAffinityGroups API parameters

Hi, listAffinityGroups API should support for account and domainId parameters . All regular users (other than admin users) can list only affinity group that belongs to them. But Admin users should be able to list affinity groups that belong to other accounts passed in account and domain Id

RE: IPv6 support

Hi, IPV6 feature is supported in 4.1 but it is experimental and UI is not available. Also you will need to use System Vm templates that have support for ipv6. Only Phase 1 from the FS - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/IPv6+support is supported. In 4.2 , there will be

RE: Review request for Test Plan for Deploy virtual machine user data enhancements

Shweta, I have 1 suggestion after going over the test plans. As part of validations for your test cases could you also include the check to make sure that we are able to fetch the user data successfully from within the user Vms. Thanks Sangeetha -Original Message- From: Shweta Agarwal

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1820 - Automation: Need to add automation for AWS Style region feature

--- Yes , master Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Review Request: fix test scripts to conform with library changes relating to account object

, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request: fix regions related test script to conform with library changes relating to account object

/test_regions.py PRE-CREATION Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10941/diff/ Testing --- Able to execute test_regions.py . Earlier there were syntax errors. Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1820 - Automation: Need to add automation for AWS Style region feature

://reviews.apache.org/r/10936/diff/ Testing (updated) --- Executed the scripts against a CloudStack set up and made sure they executed successfully. Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

RE: ssvm service name (vmware)

Sorry ..It is cloud . It is cloudstack-agent only for KVM hosts. -Thanks Sangeetha -Original Message- From: Sangeetha Hariharan [mailto:sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com] Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2013 4:07 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: ssvm service name (vmware

RE: [ACS42][QA]Issues with latest Master Build (Xenserver)

, Apr 16, 2013 at 04:33:40PM -0700, Sangeetha Hariharan wrote: I am not able to start user Vms successfully using the build from master. I am testing with Xenserver 6.0.2 hosts. User Vm starts successfully but it gets to stopped state after few seconds. deployVM reports success . But later

RE: [QA][ACS42] Test Plan for Change Account Membership CS-1390

Parth, As part of verification after the change in ownership is done , can you include the following checks: 1. New owner is able to start the Vm successfully. 2. Original owner is not able to list this Vm. 3. Vm is not part of the original isolated network anymore and cannot be accessed from

RE: [ACS42][QA]Issues with latest Master Build (Xenserver)

to deploy Vms with lesser RAM ? Is anybody else facing this issue? -Thanks Sangeetha From: Sangeetha Hariharan Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 9:59 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ACS42][QA]Issues with latest Master Build (Xenserver

RE: How to set the default network when I specify IP use iptonetworklist parameter when deploy a vm?

this problem? 2013/4/16 Sangeetha Hariharan sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com When using iptonetworklist when deploying Vms ,first entry in the iptonetworklist ( iptonetworklist[0].networkid) becomes the default network. -Thanks Sangeetha -Original Message- From: Alena Prokharchyk

RE: CLOUDSTACK-1747: fresh deploydb bug in 4.1 requires cherry-pick commits from master

I still see this issue on master build , where after executing cloudstack-setup-databases DB version is still pointing to 4.0.0. I have logged the following bug to track this issue: CLOUDSTACK-2052 - After executing cloudstack-setup-databases , DB version is still pointing to 4.0.0.

RE: [ACS42][QA]Issues with latest Master Build (Xenserver)

I am not able to start user Vms successfully using the build from master. I am testing with Xenserver 6.0.2 hosts. User Vm starts successfully but it gets to stopped state after few seconds. deployVM reports success . But later on cluster sync sees this Vm in stopped state and sends a

RE: How to set the default network when I specify IP use iptonetworklist parameter when deploy a vm?

When using iptonetworklist when deploying Vms ,first entry in the iptonetworklist ( iptonetworklist[0].networkid) becomes the default network. -Thanks Sangeetha -Original Message- From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 9:32 AM To:

RE: The given command does not exist or it is not available for user

I have seen this issue happen intermittently when the management server has not yet loaded all the components but we are able to access the management server UI. At this point , when we log in , we are presented with The given command does not exist or it is not available for user. But when

RE: CLOUDSTACK-1732

Thank you Marcus. Test with the latest build from master. When deploying a Vm on a IP6 network , we see the dnsmasq service running successfully in the router . Vms get deployed successfully and get an Ipv6 address. I have closed the bug. -Thanks Sangeetha -Original Message- From:

RE: [DIscuss]Storage image store plugin framework refactoring

template into primary storage), and old NFS based secondary storage deployment model needs them(data copy when cross zone). How does this change? On 4/8/13 6:34 PM, Sangeetha Hariharan sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com wrote: Min, Could you also include the details of the API changes

RE: [ACS42][QA]Test Plan for Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules

- From: srivatsav.prasa...@gmail.com [mailto:srivatsav.prasa...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of prasanna Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 6:24 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ACS42][QA]Test Plan for Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules On 4 April 2013 10:40, Sangeetha Hariharan sangeetha.hariha

RE: [ACS42][QA]Test Plan for Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules

Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 6:24 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ACS42][QA]Test Plan for Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules On 4 April 2013 10:40, Sangeetha Hariharan sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com wrote: Test cases for Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules is posted here - https

RE: [DISCUSS] Upgrade from 4.0 - 4.1 ( components.xml and db.propetries)

adding the lines you mention. On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Sangeetha Hariharan sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com wrote: Wanted to discuss about how to deal with components.xml and db.properties when upgrading from 4.0 -4.1. 1. If someone has made changes to your existing copy

RE: [DISCUSS] Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules

Message- From: Sangeetha Hariharan [mailto:sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 11:08 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules Prachi , Thanks for your response. Had 1 follow up question

RE: [DISCUSS] Upgrade from 4.0 - 4.1 ( components.xml and db.propetries)

4.0 - 4.1: db.awsapi.username= db.awsapi.password= db.awsapi.host= db.awsapi.port= You have to add these entries to db.properties , if you want AWS query APIs to work. -Thanks Sangeetha -Original Message- From: Sangeetha Hariharan [mailto:sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com] Sent

[ACS42][QA]Test Plan for Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules

Test cases for Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules is posted here - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Test+Paln+for+Affinity-Anti-affinity+Rules. Reference FS: - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/FS+-+Affinity-Anti-affinity+groups Please review and

RE: [DISCUSS] Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules

[mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 7:51 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules Comments inline. Thanks, Prachi -Original Message- From: Sangeetha Hariharan [mailto:sangeetha.hariha

RE: [DISCUSS] Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules

Had the following questions after going over the spec - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/FS+-+Affinity-Anti-affinity+groups : 1.In the API changes section - For all the API calls listed can we include if the parameters are optional/Required? 2.Can new DB changes

RE: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

of Upgrade procedure? -Thanks Sangeetha -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 10:02 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Sangeetha Hariharan Subject: Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1 Ok, found the issue

RE: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

will arise? On Mar 28, 2013 11:38 AM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 09:51:16AM -0700, Sangeetha Hariharan wrote: Can we get a confirmation on the approach we want to take? 1. We are going to fix the router for the case - if the router has

RE: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

: Thursday, March 28, 2013 12:18 PM To: Sangeetha Hariharan Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1 On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:28:33AM -0700, Sangeetha Hariharan wrote: Then we can go with the option of reboot (start and stop) of all the system Vms

RE: [jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-1844) Upgrade 4.0 - 4.1 - KVM host agent.properties is not restored as part of upgrading the binaries from 4.0 to 4.1.

rpms and we copy the old agent.properties, everything started up fine. I'll take a look. More info on your test setup is appreciated. On Mar 28, 2013 7:43 PM, Sangeetha Hariharan (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote: Sangeetha Hariharan created CLOUDSTACK-1844