Hey hey,
On Sep 23, 2014, at 11:50 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
Hi David,
On 23-Sep-2014, at 8:31 pm, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
Where was the merge request for this huge merge to master? (it was
Hey David,
This is one of the requests that came in using the “new github pull request
thing. The big advantage is that we leverage the nice things from github. Part
of doing it that way means we keep the history of the original developer
intact. With review board we typically get one smashed
Hi David,
On 23-Sep-2014, at 8:31 pm, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
Where was the merge request for this huge merge to master? (it was at
50 commit emails, when it stopped sending, )
We have passed feature freeze for 4.5.0, so I am confused as why this
was merged. Is there a reason not to
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Hi David,
On 23-Sep-2014, at 8:31 pm, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
Where was the merge request for this huge merge to master? (it was at
50 commit emails, when it stopped sending, )
We have passed feature
Hi David,
On 23-Sep-2014, at 11:50 pm, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
Yes, GH PR is exactly like the Review Board emails in this particular
aspect. My question is why is this merged into master rather than a
feature branch, and why no [MERGE] email as per:
