Re: [DISCUSS] Java 7, tomcat 7 and further upgrades

2013-09-18 Thread Hugo Trippaers
Hey all, Sorry for the threadomancy, but the discussion have become relevant again with the current issues with the libvirt library. Of course this could also be solved by updating the libvirt library with a jdk6 version. Still it might be good to revisit this topic. It appears not to be

RE: [DISCUSS] Java 7, tomcat 7 and further upgrades

2013-09-18 Thread Alex Huang
: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 5:10 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Java 7, tomcat 7 and further upgrades Hey all, Sorry for the threadomancy, but the discussion have become relevant again

Re: [DISCUSS] Java 7, tomcat 7 and further upgrades

2013-09-18 Thread Darren Shepherd
[mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 5:10 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Java 7, tomcat 7 and further upgrades Hey all, Sorry for the threadomancy, but the discussion have become relevant again

Re: [DISCUSS] Java 7, tomcat 7 and further upgrades

2013-09-18 Thread Wido den Hollander
Trippaers Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 5:10 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Java 7, tomcat 7 and further upgrades Hey all, Sorry for the threadomancy, but the discussion have become relevant again with the current issues with the libvirt library. Of course this could also

Re: [DISCUSS] Java 7, tomcat 7 and further upgrades

2013-09-18 Thread Darren Shepherd
. Are all of them shipping with jdk1.7 now? --Alex -Original Message- From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 5:10 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Java 7, tomcat 7 and further upgrades Hey

Re: [DISCUSS] Java 7, tomcat 7 and further upgrades

2013-06-28 Thread Wido den Hollander
Hi, On 06/27/2013 12:36 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: Hey everyone, Back in February 2013 Oracle announced the end of public support for java 1.6 already. Today we are still using java 1.6 as our supported platform. I've been looking at the next generation of linux distributions (well mainly at

Re: [DISCUSS] Java 7, tomcat 7 and further upgrades

2013-06-27 Thread John Burwell
All, I am +1 for Java7. However, I would like to propose ridding ourselves of Tomcat entirely and embedding a network stack such as Netty (http://netty.io) with a servlet bridge. We have one JSP in the system that generates JSON resources. It could be easily eliminated with a simple servlet

[DISCUSS] Java 7, tomcat 7 and further upgrades

2013-06-26 Thread Hugo Trippaers
Hey everyone, Back in February 2013 Oracle announced the end of public support for java 1.6 already. Today we are still using java 1.6 as our supported platform. I've been looking at the next generation of linux distributions (well mainly at Fedora 18, which will probably become RHEL 7) and

Re: [DISCUSS] Java 7, tomcat 7 and further upgrades

2013-06-26 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013, at 05:36 PM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: However at a certain point we should start to advice people to run CloudStack on java 1.7 as there are no more public security updates to java 1.6. Previously: http://markmail.org/thread/s2dzo5ib7ox46l4f So summarized proposal, make

Re: [DISCUSS] Java 7, tomcat 7 and further upgrades

2013-06-26 Thread Mike Tutkowski
+1 Sounds like a good idea to move forward to 1.7. On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote: On Wed, Jun 26, 2013, at 05:36 PM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: However at a certain point we should start to advice people to run CloudStack on java 1.7 as there are no more