Re: [DISCUSS] Move to jdk11 and use jlink

2019-03-21 Thread Rohit Yadav
To: Marc-Aurèle Brothier; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move to jdk11 and use jlink It sounds like a good idea to get ahead of the curve.. We probably need a 'plan' which we can all get behind and ready the users for. especially if it is going to mean dropping some OS support. one

Re: [DISCUSS] Move to jdk11 and use jlink

2019-03-21 Thread Paul Angus
y to have to release a CloudStack update, rather than advise users to upgrade their JRE? From: Marc-Aurèle Brothier Sent: 20 March 2019 17:31 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move to jdk11 and use jlink Hi Rohit, I think it’s a good mov

Re: [DISCUSS] Move to jdk11 and use jlink

2019-03-20 Thread Marc-Aurèle Brothier
Hi Rohit, I think it’s a good move. After some recent testing I found some incompatibility between the jdk11 and older version of spring. I don’t have at hands the links but you have to upgrade to some specific version to make it work. Marco > On 20 Mar 2019, at 05:59, Rohit Yadav wrote: >

[DISCUSS] Move to jdk11 and use jlink

2019-03-19 Thread Rohit Yadav
All, JDK8 has reached eol wrt public updates from Oracle and JDK11 is the most recent LTS. Should we discuss and plan the next release to move to JDK11, the effort may be as minimal as changing the jdk requirements in maven config files. Wrt consumption on centos6 (was there was an argument to