fferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 30 July 2013 5:19 PM
> To:
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] maven dependencies...
>
> BTW, how is the dependency on org.apache.commons.io.FileUtils
> expressed? Has this code changed recently?
>
> Using this morning's master, the managem
lassLoader.loadClass(WebAppClassLoader.java:401)
at
org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppClassLoader.loadClass(WebAppClassLoader.java:363)
... 13 more
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: 30 July 2013 4:12 PM
> To:
> Subjec
Original Message-
> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 6:05 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] maven dependencies...
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 08:40:44PM +, D
d all the rest of them to %{c1} unless
we rather not have the package abbreviations.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 6:05 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] maven depen
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 08:40:44PM +, Donal Lafferty wrote:
> Could you also have a look at ./client/tomcatconf/log4j-cloud.xml.in?
>
> It looks like it was updated in the refactor.
>
> AFAIK, in '', {1.} should be {1}.
>
> See "Conversion Character" chart under
> http://logging.apache.org/
ere's a lot of paper work for me to make the update :(
DL
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 29 July 2013 6:56 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] maven dependencies...
>
> Thanks for poi
Thanks for pointing that out. I think the latest fixed this.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 10:45 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] maven dependencies...
>
&
Is it correct for dependencies to appear twice in the base pom.xml?
E.g. mysql-connector-java
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 26 July 2013 11:10 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] maven dependencies..
ship it;)
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Alex Huang wrote:
> Everyone,
>
> After looking around in the maven documentation, I realized the way we are
> specifying dependencies is not quite right for a large project such as ours.
>
> Currently, almost every project declare their own dependenc
Everyone,
After looking around in the maven documentation, I realized the way we are
specifying dependencies is not quite right for a large project such as ours.
Currently, almost every project declare their own dependencies and version
number of the dependent jar. For those of us who are cons
10 matches
Mail list logo
