[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1665: Changes database upgrade script names to be consiste...

2016-09-02 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1665 Thanks @milamberspace Based on the tests and LGTMs, I'll proceed with merging this on 4.9. On fwd-merging, I've fixed conflicts and renamed a subsequent class to match the change. Fwd-merged

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1665: Changes database upgrade script names to be consiste...

2016-09-02 Thread milamberspace
Github user milamberspace commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1665 LGTM. Tested on CS 4.9.0 to 4.9.1.0-snapshot installation. (perhaps just change the comment below inside the SQL file to indicate 4.9.1.0 (missing .0?) "-- Schema

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1665: Changes database upgrade script names to be consiste...

2016-09-02 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1665 Tests performed after fwd-merge, all pass: - Upgraded from 4.9.1.0 - Clean db deployment --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1665: Changes database upgrade script names to be consiste...

2016-09-02 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1665 Tests performed: - Upgraded from 4.9.0, upgrade path ran (whose sql file names were changed) - Clean db deployment --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1665: Changes database upgrade script names to be consiste...

2016-09-02 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1665 LGTM --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1665: Changes database upgrade script names to be consiste...

2016-09-01 Thread jburwell
Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1665 @rhtyd good catch -- sorry for that oversight. I have redone the PR to only rename the files and class. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1665: Changes database upgrade script names to be consiste...

2016-09-01 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1665 @jburwell we'll need that upgrade path class, we have some alter table changes we want for the 4.9.0->4.9.1.0 upgrade path, see the diff for changes you've removed. --- If your project is set

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1665: Changes database upgrade script names to be consiste...

2016-09-01 Thread jburwell
Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1665 @rhtyd I have fixed the ``DatabaseUpgradeCheckerTest`` to reflect 4.9.1.0 being a ``NoopUpgrade``. I also removed the unnecessary 4.9.0->4.9.1.0 upgrade scripts and class. --- If your

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1665: Changes database upgrade script names to be consiste...

2016-09-01 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1665 @jburwell this needs to be reworked now that #1654 is merged. Good to have the changes but not a blocker for 4.8, 4.9 RCs. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1665: Changes database upgrade script names to be consiste...

2016-08-30 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1665 With new db schema/versioning and upgrade changes in #1654 we can merge this with some additional changes once #1654 is merged and fwd-merged. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1665: Changes database upgrade script names to be consiste...

2016-08-29 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1665 @jburwell -1 The db upgrade version only considers the major/minor fields such as a.b.c, the last `.d` is ignored (for that matter any other suffix in the version). Due to the current