Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
Both #1829 and #1941 are merged and is causing build failures. I am
creating new PR with the revert.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply app
Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
@rhtyd @anshul1886 I suggest merging this first as the changes here are
very limited and tested. We can refactor the change out from #1941
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
Okay @syed either PR need to be merged to solve the issue of restart bug.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
@anshul1886 it looks like #672 is closed so that leaves us with #1941 , Are
we targeting it for 4.10? If yes, then there are some comments there which you
might want to address there. If we do make
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
This is ready for merge @karuturi
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
@karuturi let's merge this, thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabl
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
Trillian test result (tid-859)
Environment: vmware-60u2 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 41776 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoranguta
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
LGTM, code and (regression) tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
Trillian test result (tid-851)
Environment: vmware-60u2 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 35957 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoranguta
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
@borisstoyanov a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + vmware-60u2) has
been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
@blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-60u2
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
LGTM. /cc @karuturi
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes s
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
Trillian test result (tid-840)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 32519 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoranguta
Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
@borisstoyanov I've done my testing on a linux based HVM VM and it works
as expected after the fix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
thanks @syed
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
@borisstoyanov a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + vmware-60u2) has
been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
@borisstoyanov a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has
been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
@blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-60u2
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
@blueorangutan test centos7 kvm-centos7
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
I've verified this with Windows HVM enabled template. Having more than 4
disks (6 data disks in my case), removing the disk on deviceId=4. After a
reboot the VM boots as expected, user is
Github user koushik-das commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
@borisstoyanov Sorry don't have a windows template
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
@koushik-das happen to have any handy?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user koushik-das commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
@borisstoyanov try using a Windows template
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
Hi @syed @koushik-das, I'm trying to verify this as well, I've built an
environment and I was wondering what template were you guys using?
I've tried with this one:
http://dl.openvm.e
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
LGTM. @karuturi this can be merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabl
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
Trillian test result (tid-821)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 38820 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoran
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
@borisstoyanov a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + xenserver-65sp1)
has been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have y
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
@blueorangutan test centos7 xenserver-65sp1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
@borisstoyanov unsupported parameters provided. Supported mgmt server os
are: `centos6, centos7, ubuntu`. Supported hypervisors are: `kvm-centos6,
kvm-centos7, kvm-ubuntu, xenserver-65sp1,
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
@blueorangutan test centos7 xenserver-65sp2
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-485
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
@borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep
you posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
re
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user koushik-das commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
@pdube The description mentions about a way to workaround the problem,
thats the reason for not calling it a blocker. If you think the issue is
important for the current 4.9 release, please
Github user pdube commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
@rhtyd @koushik-das definitely a blocker IMHO. Being unable to start/reboot
a VM that has 3 volumes is unacceptable in a public cloud scenario
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user koushik-das commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
Changes LGTM. As @syed mentioned there is a workaround, so won't qualify as
a blocker.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHu
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
@koushik-das @syed is this blocker for 4.9/4.10?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
@koushik-das I like that fix. I've modified my fix to do a better check.
@rhtyd I've rebased to 4.9 as well.
Thank you guys for the prompt replies :)
---
If your project is set up for it, yo
Github user koushik-das commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
@syed Please check #672. There was a discussion sometimes back on dev@ and
this PR was mentioned. I feel that fix is slightly better than removing the
check altogether.
---
If your project
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
@syed can you rebase against 4.9 and change PR's branch to 4.9? As soon as
4.9.1.0 is out, we'll work towards 4.9.2.0 and work towards the next minor
release to include several such bugfixes.
--
40 matches
Mail list logo
