On 3/26/13 2:26 PM, "David Nalley" wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Chiradeep Vittal
> wrote:
>> To enable a cloud to start quicker, I am proposing that system vms be
>>made optional in the boot-up of a CloudStack Cloud.
>> I'm working on the 'quickcloud' branch and the detailed proposa
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Chiradeep Vittal
wrote:
> To enable a cloud to start quicker, I am proposing that system vms be made
> optional in the boot-up of a CloudStack Cloud.
> I'm working on the 'quickcloud' branch and the detailed proposal is here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 02:05:49PM -0700, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
> Yes, baremetal implies not inside a system vm, so it could run in a VM
> whose lifecycle is not controlled by CloudStack.
Great! That's what thought. You might want to update to be a little
more clear about it though, because I
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:
> That facility exists already, although the only supported baremetal
> appliance is the Juniper SRX.
And thats expensive. Id prefer a viable open source solution
external on bare metal then on the h
That facility exists already, although the only supported baremetal
appliance is the Juniper SRX.
On 3/25/13 1:59 PM, "Outback Dingo" wrote:
>it would be even nicer if the "virtual router" could be bare metal so as
>not to use resources required on the hosts
>Id much prefer to run Vyatta, or oth
Yes, baremetal implies not inside a system vm, so it could run in a VM
whose lifecycle is not controlled by CloudStack.
On 3/25/13 1:44 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 11:54:09PM -0700, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
>> To enable a cloud to start quicker, I am proposing that system
it would be even nicer if the "virtual router" could be bare metal so as
not to use resources required on the hosts
Id much prefer to run Vyatta, or other FreeBSD pf box as the virtual
router, and just have cloudstack comunicate to it
however its probably outside the scope of this document, Im also
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 11:54:09PM -0700, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
> To enable a cloud to start quicker, I am proposing that system vms be made
> optional in the boot-up of a CloudStack Cloud.
> I'm working on the 'quickcloud' branch and the detailed proposal is here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/con
For clouds offering a full range of network services ("Advanced"), the
virtual router template will still be necessary.
On 3/25/13 2:43 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote:
>Nice proposal, I would love to escape the necessity to preseed and
>launch service VMs in order to install/start CloudStack to launch
Nice proposal, I would love to escape the necessity to preseed and
launch service VMs in order to install/start CloudStack to launch
instances.
But, in future when this work will be completed, won't we have to
preseed systemvm templates or this whole service vms feature (vr,
ssvm, cpvm) would be o
To enable a cloud to start quicker, I am proposing that system vms be made
optional in the boot-up of a CloudStack Cloud.
I'm working on the 'quickcloud' branch and the detailed proposal is here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/clnVAQ
11 matches
Mail list logo