Hi All,
The vote for Apache CloudStack 4.16.1.0 *passes* with
7 PMC + 4 non-PMC votes.
+1 (PMC / binding)
7 persons (Boris, Nux, Rohit, Nicolas, Wei, Daan, Andrija)
+1 (non binding)
4 persons (Vladi, Harikrishna, Suresh, Slavka)
0
none
-1
none
Thank you everyone for participating.
I will now
+1 (binding)
Tested upgrading 4.13.1 with multiple hypervisors, automatic-systemVM
template registration; basic VM/network lifecycle, Advanced Zone.
On Wed, 2 Mar 2022 at 16:48, Slavka Peleva
wrote:
> +1 Tested on KVM (CentOS7) with NFS/Ceph/StorPool a few storage operations
> with a Basic Zone
+1 Tested on KVM (CentOS7) with NFS/Ceph/StorPool a few storage operations
with a Basic Zone.
Best regards,
Slavka
On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 4:02 PM Suresh Anaparti <
suresh.anapa...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Adding my vote as well. Manually tested various VM, Volume and Network
> operations i
+1
Adding my vote as well. Manually tested various VM, Volume and Network
operations in Advanced Zone, on fresh and upgrade(from 4.15.2) environments
(MS: CentOS 7 + Hypervisor: CentOS 7 KVM). Also, verified the automated smoke
tests results in environments with MS on CentOS 7 and Hypervisors -
+1
On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 1:29 PM Wei ZHOU wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> tested vm lifecycle on vmware70u3.
>
> -Wei
>
> On Fri, 25 Feb 2022 at 16:09, Suresh Anaparti <
> suresh.anapa...@shapeblue.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I have created a 4.16.1.0 release (RC2), with the following artifac
+1 (binding)
tested vm lifecycle on vmware70u3.
-Wei
On Fri, 25 Feb 2022 at 16:09, Suresh Anaparti
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have created a 4.16.1.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up
> for testing and a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SHA:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Nicolas Vazquez
From: Harikrishna Patnala
Date: Wednesday, 2 March 2022 at 04:02
To: dev
Cc: users
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.16.1.0 (RC2)
+1
Tested on a VMware environment with VM and volume operations on NFS and
Datastore Cluster storage types and a few
CloudStack 4.16.1.0 (RC2)
+1 (binding)
Regards.
From: Gabriel Br?scher
Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 9:41:25 PM
To: dev
Cc: users
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.16.1.0 (RC2)
+1 on continuing with RC2 Vote.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022, 17:03 Vladimir Petrov
+1 (binding)
Regards.
From: Gabriel Br?scher
Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 9:41:25 PM
To: dev
Cc: users
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.16.1.0 (RC2)
+1 on continuing with RC2 Vote.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022, 17:03 Vladimir Petrov
wrote:
> Hi
+1 on continuing with RC2 Vote.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022, 17:03 Vladimir Petrov
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Voting +1
>
> I did a lot of upgrade tests with pre-RC, RC1 and RC2 versions, using
> different hypervisors and from different versions (4.11, 4.13, 4.15.2,
> 4.16.0). I also tested main workflows and
Hi all,
Voting +1
I did a lot of upgrade tests with pre-RC, RC1 and RC2 versions, using different
hypervisors and from different versions (4.11, 4.13, 4.15.2, 4.16.0). I also
tested main workflows and basic operations and haven't found a single issue.
Best wishes,
Vladi
Suresh Anaparti wrote
uld possible run an API against that).
>
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
> From: Andrija Panic
> Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 04:36
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.16.1.0 (RC2)
>
> By all means, although we could argue that this
ew
> the UUID could possible run an API against that).
>
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
> From: Andrija Panic
> Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 04:36
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.16.1.0 (RC2)
>
> By all means, although we coul
g a broad search for all APIs where a similar
behaviour may exist (user can't list the resource, but if they knew the UUID
could possible run an API against that).
Regards.
From: Andrija Panic
Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 04:36
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] A
By all means, although we could argue that this is NOT a regression, and as
such we might skip it - but it's a security/privacy issue, so we should
better fix it in RC3, yes.
On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 at 16:15, Gabriel Bräscher wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> I would like to raise the issue
> https://github
Hello folks,
I would like to raise the issue
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/6049.
It affects not only 4.16.1.0 RC2, but also previous releases.
I consider it a critical issue, which could potentially impact the need for
a release candidate #3.
Any thoughts?
Regards,
Gabriel.
On Mon,
+1 (binding)
Tested KVM in advanced zones (with and without security groups).
Everything seems to be working.
---
Nux!
www.nux.ro
On 2022-02-25 15:08, Suresh Anaparti wrote:
Hi All,
I have created a 4.16.1.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts
up for testing and a vote:
Git Branch
,
us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.16.1.0 (RC2)
Hi All,
I have created a 4.16.1.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up for
testing and a vote:
Git Branch and Commit SHA:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.16.1.0-RC20220225T1901
Commit
Hi All,
I have created a 4.16.1.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up for
testing and a vote:
Git Branch and Commit SHA:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.16.1.0-RC20220225T1901
Commit: cad9332082a1f85eedc30cf547ae28224be170c2
Source release (checksums and signatures are av
19 matches
Mail list logo
