> Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 18:20
> To: users ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> ; Wido Hollander ; Wei Zhou
>
> Cc: li jerry ; Gabriel Beims Bräscher
> ; Wei ZHOU ; Daan Hoogland
>
> Subject: Re: 回复: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]
>
> All,
>
&
egards.
From: Rohit Yadav
Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 18:20
To: users ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
; Wido Hollander ; Wei Zhou
Cc: li jerry ; Gabriel Beims Bräscher
; Wei ZHOU ; Daan Hoogland
Subject: Re: 回复: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]
All,
I've
gt; to specify rados monitor port)?
> >
> > I would not say this is a blocker for now. Ceph is moving away from port
> > 6789 as the default and libvirt is already handling this.
> >
> > This needs to be fixed though and I see that a ticket is open for this.
> > I'll look into this w
e
>> seems to be rbd pool fails to be added if a port is not specified - what do
>> you think, should we treat this as blocker or document it (i.e. ask admins
>> to specify rados monitor port)?
>>>
>>> I would not say this is a blocker for now. Ceph is moving
ibvirt is already handling this.
> >
> > This needs to be fixed though and I see that a ticket is open for this.
> > I'll look into this with Gabriel.
> >
> > Keep in mind that port numer 6789 is not the default for Ceph! Messenger
> > v2 uses port 3300 and therefor it's best n
ticket is open for this.
> I'll look into this with Gabriel.
>
> Keep in mind that port numer 6789 is not the default for Ceph! Messenger
> v2 uses port 3300 and therefor it's best not to specify any port and have the
> Ceph client sort this out.
>
> In addition I would always su
Monday, January 4, 2021 13:10
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ;
> us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: 回复: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]
>
> Hi Rohit
>
> Yes, I didn't specify a port when I added primary storage;
>
> After r failed, I checked wit
: Monday, January 4, 2021 12:52
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: dev
Subject: 回复: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]
I'm creating PR to fix this.
I think we should block, because it will cause the RBD primary storage to be
unable to be added.
-邮件原件-
发件人: Daan Hoogland
发送时间: 2021年1月4日 14
I'm creating PR to fix this.
I think we should block, because it will cause the RBD primary storage to be
unable to be added.
-邮件原件-
发件人: Daan Hoogland
发送时间: 2021年1月4日 14:57
收件人: users
抄送: dev
主题: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]
looks good Jerry,
Are you making a
- Is this a setup that does work with a prior version?
- Did you fresh install or upgrade?
No, This is a new deployment, there are no upgrades
I have changed two methods. At present, RBD storage is running
10 matches
Mail list logo
