That's something I hadn't thought of. Adding tags when the usage job runs
sounds like a better approach. It will also limit the potential number of
places where changes need to be made. I'm planning to include tags as an
array in a field or possible comma separated values.
Thanks,
-Syed
On Tue,
Hi Syed,
I see the use case and yes this could work – couple of things:
- Any resource could have multiple tags – would they all be included as an
array in a single DB field, or would you want to just define one specific tag (
e.g. “owner” or “costcentre”) and include that single field?
- How
Hi Guys,
Currently the usage record in CloudStack doesn't include the resource tags
and we are having more and more use cases where we feel like including tags
will immensely help with the chargeback logic. Currently, we go back and
query Cloudstack to give us the tags associated with a resource.
