> >
> > Kris Sterckx
> >
> >
> >
> > On 25 March 2016 at 07:08, Sanjeev Neelarapu <
> > sanjeev.neelar...@accelerite.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Nick Livens,
> >>
> >> I have gone through the FS and following are my review
ring on lb appliance
>> instead of Nuage VPS ? If we configure firewall rules for LB services on
>> the Nuage VSP instead of the inline lb appliance (iptable rules for lb
>> traffic), traffic can be filtered on the Nuage VSP before Natting?
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Sanjeev N
--Original Message-
> From: ilya [mailto:ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 10:16 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Request for comments : VPC Inline LoadBalancer (new
> plugin)
>
> Hi Nick,
>
> Being fan of SD
| EMail: sanjeev.neelar...@accelerite.com
-Original Message-
From: ilya [mailto:ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 10:16 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Request for comments : VPC Inline LoadBalancer (new
plugin)
Hi Nick,
Being fan
Hi Nick,
Being fan of SDN, I gave this proposal a thorough read.
I do have only 1 comment - that you can perhaps can use to reconsider:
"Each appliance will have 2 nics, one for management, and one in the
guest network. "
In general, 2 nics - one going to management and one going to guest - is
