A bit rough, but you get the idea
http://www.cloudstackforum.com/vanilla/
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: sebgoa run...@gmail.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Friday, 3 July, 2015 08:27:43
Subject: Re: IRC
-Original Message-
From: John Burwell [mailto:john.burw...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 04 July 2015 15:28
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: IRC and Slack
For me, wile Slack is a nice experience, it’s barrier of entry is much higher
— discouraging new participants.
While developer
Remi,
The fact that a chat channel is limited to those with an @apache.org account
and requires knowing who to ask for invitation runs counter the Apache Way.
Chat channels should be open and discoverable by all.
I am with Nux, -1 for anything like Hipchat, Slack, etc. If some folks prefer
I think we are all in agreement here, so let's move on with:
-consolidate #cloudstack and #cloudstack-dev (who can do that ? )
-let's try to be more present on IRC (that's for everyone )
-let's try to setup some slack/IRC proxy so that folks who are using Slack
right now can make the IRC folks
Hi all,
I setup a gateway that sends messages back and forth. Let me use it for a while
to so I can tweak it if needed. It also needs to prove how stable this is.
This is what it does:
Freenode #cloudstack === Slack #general
So, item 3 from the list done and this will help me doing item 2 as
John,
All we did was quickly setup as POC to test it out with some folks. I never
said it should replace anything in its current state.
Regards, Remi
On 04 Jul 2015, at 16:32 , John Burwell john.burw...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Remi,
The fact that a chat channel is limited to those with
Erik,
I don’t think measuring current #cloudstaack-dev activity is relevant. A
number of developers have been experimenting with Slack which would naturally
decrease activity. The question for the community is which means should we all
use going forward, and deprecate the other.
For me,
+0
Email and MLs are going to stay, so for IMs and chatting we can use one or more
of such tools. I like Slack, the searchable history and whatnot, but I think
realtime communication in general may face the same problems as with using IRC.
Another issue with using tools like slack, hipchat
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
+0
Email and MLs are going to stay, so for IMs and chatting we can use one or
more of such tools. I like Slack, the searchable history and whatnot, but I
think realtime communication in general may face the same
Some great ideas in there.
I am +1 for:
-consolidate #cloudstack-dev and #cloudstack
-move bots to #cloudstack-announce
-Remi's idea to publish slack message to #cloudstack (and vice versa).
-the idea to use something like discourse or stack overflow etc…
Somebody wants to take this on :)
On
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 9:27 AM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
Some great ideas in there.
I am +1 for:
-consolidate #cloudstack-dev and #cloudstack
-move bots to #cloudstack-announce
-Remi's idea to publish slack message to #cloudstack (and vice versa).
-the idea to use something like
On Jul 3, 2015, at 10:17 AM, Remi Bergsma r...@remi.nl wrote:
I setup a proof-of-concept a while back to test it:
http://cloudstackdev.slack.com. There currently are around 30 people, mostly
dev from this list.
Anyone with an @apache.org account can sign-up and anyone else could ask me,
I setup a proof-of-concept a while back to test it:
http://cloudstackdev.slack.com. There currently are around 30 people, mostly
dev from this list.
Anyone with an @apache.org account can sign-up and anyone else could ask me,
Daan, Rohit, Wilder or Funs for an invite (for now). I can imagine
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi folks,
IRC has been mostly deserted for a while now. But there are still folks
hanging out there with unanswered questions.
I also know of several slack channels on cloudstack.
We need to take a decision here.
Hi
On 02.07.2015 10:39, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
We need to take a decision here. Shall we officially abandon IRC and out a
notice there that points towards Slack.
-1 for abondon IRC.
* IRC is simple and easy, well known and distributed. Not every question
fits to IRC, thats ok. If it gets
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Rene Moser m...@renemoser.net wrote:
Hi
On 02.07.2015 10:39, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
We need to take a decision here. Shall we officially abandon IRC and out
a notice there that points towards Slack.
-1 for abondon IRC.
* IRC is simple and easy, well
All,
For me, the most significant issues with IRC is that there is no searchable
history, backlog to catch up when offline, or good mobile clients (yes, mobile
IRC clients exists, but work poorly in my view). While some of these solutions
can be solved by running an IRC proxy such as znc or
What if we use the best of both worlds, by using something like [1]?
We obviously need to dive a bit into this and see how well it works. There
might be alternatives. The benefit of such a solution would be that if you
could see messages on IRC in Slack and v.v. that would make them more
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:15 PM, John Burwell john.burw...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
All,
For me, the most significant issues with IRC is that there is no
searchable history, backlog to catch up when offline, or good mobile
clients (yes, mobile IRC clients exists, but work poorly in my view).
Hi,
Our IRC channels seem to be dead, indeed, at least for user support purposes.
IRC is pretty established and works great for many projects, it just requires
people active then and there.
Probably any form of chat will have the same fate no matter how trendy and
personally -1 for anything
20 matches
Mail list logo
