Re: PRs for 4.10

2017-02-26 Thread Rajani Karuturi
> <https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1945>https:// > > github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1946 > > > > <https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1946>https:// > > github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1947 > > https://github.com/apache

Re: PRs for 4.10

2017-02-22 Thread Sergey Levitskiy
tps://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1856 > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1212 > > > > Regards. > > ____________ > From: Rajani Karuturi > Sent: 22 February 2017 14:41:42 > To: dev@cloudstack.apa

Re: PRs for 4.10

2017-02-22 Thread David Mabry
; > > Regards. > > ____ > From: Rajani Karuturi > Sent: 22 February 2017 14:41:42 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: PRs for 4.10 > > 6 days to go for the first RC. > Please get the requir

Re: PRs for 4.10

2017-02-22 Thread Will Stevens
he/cloudstack/pull/1946>https:// > github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1947 > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1856 > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1212 > > > > Regards. > > > From: Rajani Karuturi > Sent: 22

Re: PRs for 4.10

2017-02-22 Thread Rohit Yadav
1212 Regards. From: Rajani Karuturi Sent: 22 February 2017 14:41:42 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: PRs for 4.10 6 days to go for the first RC. Please get the required lgtms and tests ready for the PRs you like to see in 4.10. I will try to merge all the PRs that me

Re: PRs for 4.10

2017-02-22 Thread Rajani Karuturi
6 days to go for the first RC. Please get the required lgtms and tests ready for the PRs you like to see in 4.10. I will try to merge all the PRs that meet the criteria. Thanks, ~Rajani On 19 Feb 2017 3:11 p.m., "Rajani Karuturi" wrote: > noted. > > > ~ Rajani > > http://cloudplatform.accelerit

Re: PRs for 4.10

2017-02-19 Thread Rajani Karuturi
noted. ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On February 17, 2017 at 6:03 PM, Frank Maximus (frank.maxi...@nuagenetworks.net) wrote: I have a couple of bugfixes on previous version outstanding, which I would like to have merged to 4.10, both still requiring review: on 4.8: PR#1912

Re: PRs for 4.10

2017-02-17 Thread Frank Maximus
I have a couple of bugfixes on previous version outstanding, which I would like to have merged to 4.10, both still requiring review: on 4.8: PR#1912 : which fixes password service running on internal lb vms, making it impossible to do loadbalancing on

Re: PRs for 4.10

2017-02-14 Thread Syed Ahmed
I'd like to include https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1928 to 4.10 as well. This is a simple fix that adds hypervisor capabilities for XenServer 7 Thanks, -Syed On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:06 AM, Will Stevens wrote: > Not sure, I will see if I can find some time tomorrow to look at this.

Re: PRs for 4.10

2017-02-13 Thread Will Stevens
Not sure, I will see if I can find some time tomorrow to look at this. Thanks... *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 11:58 PM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > Thanks Will. I will take a look at this today and merge. > > Is it possible to add a systemvmtemplat

Re: PRs for 4.10

2017-02-13 Thread Rajani Karuturi
Thanks Will. I will take a look at this today and merge. Is it possible to add a systemvmtemplate job on builds.apachecloudstack.net (https://builds.cloudstack.org/) similar to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-systemvm64-master/ ? Thanks, ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ O

Re: PRs for 4.10

2017-02-13 Thread Will Stevens
At this point, I think 1741 is ready to merge. I think we need one more LGTM though... *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Will Stevens wrote: > @Daan: In order for the tests to pass with 1741, the tests have to be run > with the SystemVM fro

Re: PRs for 4.10

2017-02-08 Thread Will Stevens
@Daan: In order for the tests to pass with 1741, the tests have to be run with the SystemVM from the PR being used. *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 2:46 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > About 1741, I started the packaging, Will but saw Boris making a > re

RE: PRs for 4.10

2017-02-08 Thread Daan Hoogland
eblue -Original Message- From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] Sent: woensdag 8 februari 2017 07:28 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: PRs for 4.10 A small bugfix for IPv6 in Basic Networking: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1927 Would be great! Wido > Op 7 feb.

Re: PRs for 4.10

2017-02-07 Thread Daan Hoogland
About 1741, I started the packaging, Will but saw Boris making a remark about the system VMs. I'll look into that and start the tests. On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 8:19 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > I would like to get 1741(strongswan) in, but I need to get Trillian to run > against it with a system vm bui

Re: PRs for 4.10

2017-02-07 Thread Wido den Hollander
A small bugfix for IPv6 in Basic Networking: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1927 Would be great! Wido > Op 7 feb. 2017 om 14:08 heeft Rajani Karuturi het > volgende geschreven: > > Hi all, > If you know of any PRs which meet the below criteria, please mail them to > me. > 1. No op

Re: PRs for 4.10

2017-02-07 Thread Will Stevens
I got my Jenkins fixed today. I will run tests against my bubble env tonight and we can go with that if Trillian can not do a systemvm template from the PR for this one. On Feb 7, 2017 7:16 PM, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote: > @milamber I will soon merge the localization PRs > > @will Yes. that would

Re: PRs for 4.10

2017-02-07 Thread Rajani Karuturi
@milamber I will soon merge the localization PRs @will Yes. that would be great addition to 4.10. Its pending from a long time. @sergey 1913 has open questions. Can you answer them please? rest I will take a look. PS: based on the pattern(17*[0,2,4,8,]7) I also checked 1707. I will add it to my

Re: PRs for 4.10

2017-02-07 Thread Sergey Levitskiy
I would like to include : PR1727 CLOUDSTACK-9539: Support changing Service offering for instance with VM Snapshots PR1747 CLOUDSTACK-9574: Redesign storage views PR1767 CLOUDSTACK-9457: Allow retrieval and modification of VM and template details via API and UI They have all tests green and jus

Re: PRs for 4.10

2017-02-07 Thread Will Stevens
I would like to get 1741(strongswan) in, but I need to get Trillian to run against it with a system vm built from my pr. I have done a CI in bubble and it came back clean, but would like confirmation through Trillian as well. On Feb 7, 2017 2:17 PM, "Milamber" wrote: > > And this PR for 4.9 but

Re: PRs for 4.10

2017-02-07 Thread Milamber
And this PR for 4.9 but need to be foward to 4.10 too. https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1929 2 LGTM CI green On 07/02/2017 13:07, Rajani Karuturi wrote: Hi all, If you know of any PRs which meet the below criteria, please mail them to me. 1. No open questions. 2. Has two LGTMs 3. Ha

Re: PRs for 4.10

2017-02-07 Thread Milamber
No 2 LGTMs, but this PR only updated the localization files for 4.10 (green on CI) https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1914 On 07/02/2017 13:07, Rajani Karuturi wrote: Hi all, If you know of any PRs which meet the below criteria, please mail them to me. 1. No open questions. 2. Has t