RE: Physical network design options - which crime to comit

2014-12-30 Thread Somesh Naidu
the hypervisor vendors. -Original Message- From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, December 26, 2014 5:59 PM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Physical network design options - which crime to comit On storage nodes - yes

Re: Physical network design options - which crime to comit

2014-12-30 Thread Andrija Panic
@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Physical network design options - which crime to comit On storage nodes - yes definitively will do it. One finall advice/opinion please...? On compute nodes, since one 10G will be shared by both primary and secondary traffic - would you separate that on 2

RE: Physical network design options - which crime to comit

2014-12-30 Thread Somesh Naidu
Subject: Re: Physical network design options - which crime to comit Somesh, thx - I understand that - one more question, since you guys are arround :) The primary storage network - I unnderstand how to separate that from management networks on the host (having separate NIC/vlan/IP inside each

Re: Physical network design options - which crime to comit

2014-12-30 Thread Andrija Panic
: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Physical network design options - which crime to comit Somesh, thx - I understand that - one more question, since you guys are arround :) The primary storage network - I unnderstand how to separate that from management networks on the host (having

RE: Physical network design options - which crime to comit

2014-12-26 Thread Somesh Naidu
I generally prefer to keep the storage traffic separate. Reason is that storage performance (provision templates to primary, snapshots, copy templates, etc) significantly impact end user experience. In addition, it also helps isolate network issues when troubleshooting. So I'd go for one of

RE: Physical network design options - which crime to comit

2014-12-26 Thread Andrija Panic
Thanks Somesh, first option also seems most logical to me. I guess you wouldn't consider doing nic bonding and then vlans with some QoS based on vlans on switch level? Thx again Sent from Google Nexus 4 On Dec 26, 2014 9:48 PM, Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com wrote: I generally prefer to

RE: Physical network design options - which crime to comit

2014-12-26 Thread Somesh Naidu
design options - which crime to comit Thanks Somesh, first option also seems most logical to me. I guess you wouldn't consider doing nic bonding and then vlans with some QoS based on vlans on switch level? Thx again Sent from Google Nexus 4 On Dec 26, 2014 9:48 PM, Somesh Naidu somesh.na

RE: Physical network design options - which crime to comit

2014-12-26 Thread Andrija Panic
...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Physical network design options - which crime to comit Thanks Somesh, first option also seems most logical to me. I guess you wouldn't consider doing nic bonding and then vlans with some QoS based on vlans on switch level? Thx again Sent from Google Nexus 4 On Dec 26