RE: Third party VR / L2 support

2015-06-23 Thread Rajesh Battala
, June 12, 2015 10:27 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Third party VR / L2 support Agree to what Funs mentioned. The current network service model is flexible, there is option to select a provider for a given service by means of network offering. About using 3rd party VR, there are 2

RE: Third party VR / L2 support

2015-06-12 Thread Paul Angus
[mailto:koushik@citrix.com] Sent: 12 June 2015 05:57 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Third party VR / L2 support Agree to what Funs mentioned. The current network service model is flexible, there is option to select a provider for a given service by means of network offering. About using

Re: Third party VR / L2 support

2015-06-12 Thread Christian
of appliances needs to be registered from CS and used. -Koushik -Original Message- From: Funs Kessen [mailto:fozzielumpk...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Funs Kessen Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 3:26 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Third party VR / L2 support Hi Christian and Paul, I

Re: Third party VR / L2 support

2015-06-12 Thread Funs Kessen
Subject: Re: Third party VR / L2 support Hi Christian and Paul, I agree that the VR/VPC construct could do with some improvements, the biggest being that it should actually be api driven and allow for more flexible networking/services combined with scale out itself (we’re looking

Re: Third party VR / L2 support

2015-06-12 Thread sebgoa
[mailto:fozzielumpk...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Funs Kessen Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 3:26 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Third party VR / L2 support Hi Christian and Paul, I agree that the VR/VPC construct could do with some improvements, the biggest being

RE: Third party VR / L2 support

2015-06-12 Thread Paul Angus
, June 12, 2015 1:06 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Third party VR / L2 support Hi Paul, We don’t disagree at all, and I think Koushik doesn’t either, we’re just talking about different things. Today there are limited options but there are ways to work with these options without

RE: Third party VR / L2 support

2015-06-11 Thread Koushik Das
, then a pre-created pool of appliances needs to be registered from CS and used. -Koushik -Original Message- From: Funs Kessen [mailto:fozzielumpk...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Funs Kessen Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 3:26 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Third party VR / L2

Re: Third party VR / L2 support

2015-06-11 Thread Erik Weber
Cloudrouter seems to be GPL2-ish. -- Erik On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Keerthiraja SJ sjkeer...@gmail.com wrote: Below are the router we can choose for the cloudstack integration. https://cloudrouter.org/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/rcp100/?source=directory On Tue, Jun 9, 2015

Re: Third party VR / L2 support

2015-06-11 Thread Keerthiraja SJ
Below are the router we can choose for the cloudstack integration. https://cloudrouter.org/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/rcp100/?source=directory On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Christian, This is a feature put forward by myself. As a

Re: Third party VR / L2 support

2015-06-09 Thread Funs Kessen
Hi Christian and Paul, I agree that the VR/VPC construct could do with some improvements, the biggest being that it should actually be api driven and allow for more flexible networking/services combined with scale out itself (we’re looking into this actually). All of these things bring along

RE: Third party VR / L2 support

2015-06-09 Thread Paul Angus
Hi Christian, This is a feature put forward by myself. As a non-developer I can come up with these things and throw them over the wall to the developers and pretend I don't know how complicated it is :) In summary, it requires a few other pieces of the roadmap to be in place. The high level