Re: VMware compatibility

I forgot about the VMware SDK. Yes, that also has to be updated. Regarding the guest OS mappings: If the are not there, no matter what the template is, the code will wind up always picking "Other" to send to VMware. It's not really noticeable with Linux, but Windows templates will have issues (at

Re: VMware compatibility

Hi Will/Rohit, Cloudstack was supporting addition of VMware vCenter 6.0 datacenter (and ESXi 6.0 hosts in it) to the Zone since the merge of PR , which fixed the underlying issues. The current VMware API build version is 6.0 and the SDK points to

Re: VMware compatibility

Hi Will, Yes while we don't have VMware 6.0 official listed as a supported hypervisor, I've reports from some users who have claim that it works for them in their environment. We have not confirmed that it works for all major environment permutations (basic zone with/without SG, with/without

Re: VMware compatibility

​Maybe I am not understanding this correctly: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1569 Can I get some clarification on this? I understand that we will have to add the OS mapping manually for the 6.0 version, but this PR is a good reference for how to do it:

Re: VMware compatibility

6.0 is not officially supported, though we have found that it will work. But there are no guest OS mappings, for example. It's easy enough to just copy the 5.5 mappings over to 6.0 in the guest_os/guest_os_hypervisor_mapping tables. So I'd say it would not officially be supported in 4.9. On Fri,

Re: VMware compatibility

Sorry for the mass mails. I am talking about 4.9 obviously... On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Will Stevens wrote: > For that matter, is there any other changes to this page? > > > http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.8.0/compat.html

Re: VMware compatibility

For that matter, is there any other changes to this page? http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.8.0/compat.html On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Will Stevens wrote: > Pierre-Luc is on vacation so I can't ask him. > > Rohit, below is