I understand, so either change the checker (as i sugested) or change the
expected result in the testcase.
Op 10 jul. 2013 15:37 schreef "Dharmesh Kakadia" het
volgende:
> @chip and @Daan Thanks for the reply.
>
> I think there is some misunderstanding. The test case is not written by me.
> It is
@chip and @Daan Thanks for the reply.
I think there is some misunderstanding. The test case is not written by me.
It is failing on an already existing test case after I did refactoring,
which is why I am worried.
Thanks,
Dharmesh
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Wed,
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 03:01:35PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> I would not bother to look at it, if I were your, Dharmesh. Find a good
> lightweigth xmlunit-like tool or another xml comaparison tool to do the
> checking. parsers and dom generators can do whatever they like with
> attribute order
I would not bother to look at it, if I were your, Dharmesh. Find a good
lightweigth xmlunit-like tool or another xml comaparison tool to do the
checking. parsers and dom generators can do whatever they like with
attribute order. I would say not with element order, but still trying to
make the xml
