Re: query about 4.4 usage

2015-02-17 Thread Daan Hoogland
Thanks Loic, give me a ping for the review On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:04 PM, loic.lamb...@exoscale.ch wrote: > Hi Daan, > > Yes we generally submit our patches upstream when we are sure that the > change will not break other environments that we cannot / have time to test. > We run basic zone and

Re: query about 4.4 usage

2015-02-17 Thread loic.lamb...@exoscale.ch
Hi Daan, Yes we generally submit our patches upstream when we are sure that the change will not break other environments that we cannot / have time to test. We run basic zone and KVM with local storage, so it’s not the most common Cloudstack setup. Our latest patches for 4.4 will be submitted

Re: query about 4.4 usage

2015-02-15 Thread Daan Hoogland
Thanks Antoine, Loic, would be good to share fixes. We had some problems with 4.4 ourselves so probably there is some doubles here. If you could, please do a merge and a pull request against apache/4.4...? thanks On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Antoine Coetsier wrote: > Hello Daan, > > Our wor

Re: query about 4.4 usage

2015-02-14 Thread Antoine Coetsier
Hello Daan, Our work is public and published here: https://github.com/exoscale/cloudstack I do not think this is worthwhile, but this is out of my league. I am Ccing Loic here, he will answer better than I can. Regards. Le 13.02.15 12:57, « Daan Hoogland » a écrit : >Antoine, >Did you feed yo

Re: query about 4.4 usage

2015-02-13 Thread Daan Hoogland
Antoine, Did you feed your patches back to the 4.4 branch and should we release another 4.4 in your opinion? On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Antoine Coetsier wrote: > Hello Daan and users, > > We at Exoscale are now using in Production a 4.4 CloudStack base + our > patches after an extensive pre

Re: query about 4.4 usage

2015-02-12 Thread Antoine Coetsier
Hello Daan and users, We at Exoscale are now using in Production a 4.4 CloudStack base + our patches after an extensive preproduction run with this version. Next migration is unlikely to be 4.5. Please, let¹s adopt all proper rebasing from one version to another in order not to have bugs fixed in

Re: query about 4.4 usage

2015-02-11 Thread Steve Wilson
Just as a data point, at Citrix we actually decided to skip 4.4 and didn¹t put out a commercial distribution based on it. We put all our energy into fixing bugs that went into 4.5. We¹re now bringing up large customers on 4.5, but too early to publish results. Overall, though, I feel good about

Re: query about 4.4 usage

2015-02-11 Thread Nux!
Hi, I'm with 4.4.1 in production on CentOS 6 HVs (should get it to 4.4.2 soon), Adv zone + SG. I keep a separate, somehow similar setup where I test stuff before going to production - I don't always catch all the bugs. Nothing fancy or automated like Jenkins etc, perhaps one day. My migration p