Edison, Min,
When creating a Zone and there is no SSVM so it sends to
LocalHostEndPoint. I always get the below error. Is there some fix
for this?
ERROR [o.a.c.s.r.NfsSecondaryStorageResource]
(pool-4-thread-1:ctx-fb095de0) Unable to create local folder for:
Please check if you can
create /var/cloudstack/mnt/secStorage/64d6e26f-e656-3ba3-908f-ce6610ede011,
and mount nfs point.
It's happening when I first create the zone. I'll debug it further to tell
you exactly what its happening. But I don't understand how the following
code in DefaultEndpointSelector could be correct. If I have a zone, and I
delete/stop/crash the SSVM, and at the same time register a new template,
Yes, that is true, it is a bug in that case. The logic of choosing
endpoint to send Command will not work properly for destroying/Stopping VM
case. Our assumption is that registering template is done when ssvm is up
and running. Otherwise, it will send to LocalHost to execute command. In
your
The behaviour should be to delay until there is a SSVM available. I don't
know if that is even possible in CloudStack, I don't want you to sleep().
Is there any way to delay? Something else in the system should be ensuring
that a SSVM is running and available (what I don't know...). If you
Delaying them until ssvm is up may not that easy to handle in current
CloudStack. We may be able to send an error in this case by distinguishing
S3 register template case from other scenarios. Would you mind filing a
JIRA bug on this? Your issue seems different from the issue filed by Daan
Does this issue exist in 4.2/4.2.1? I'm going to put the bug as blocker,
if you disagree we can lower it. I really think it is quite a bad scenario
to mount NFS to the mgmt server.
Darren
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote:
Delaying them until ssvm is up
Yes, this issue exist in 4.2/4.2.1 since DefaultEndpointSelector was
introduced in 4.2.
Thanks
-min
On 10/31/13 10:56 AM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
wrote:
Does this issue exist in 4.2/4.2.1? I'm going to put the bug as blocker,
if you disagree we can lower it. I really think
