On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 04:32:33AM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
I can think of a use case where the user wants static Ips, but with
range/overlap/reuse checks.
+1, although perhaps the tracking of IPs could be optional? Would it be
worth breaking out IPAM as a service provided to networks?
I can think of a use case where the user wants static Ips, but with
range/overlap/reuse checks.
On 7/11/13 4:41 PM, Murali Reddy murali.re...@citrix.com wrote:
On 11/07/13 2:33 PM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:27:28PM +0530, Girish Shilamkar wrote:
Hello Murali,
Thanks for your input. I have submitted a patch to remove this test.
Regards,
Girish
On 11-Jul-2013, at 4:41 PM, Murali Reddy murali.re...@citrix.com wrote:
On 11/07/13 2:33 PM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:27:28PM +0530, Girish
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:27:28PM +0530, Girish Shilamkar wrote:
Hello,
In order to create shared network StartIp/endIp/gateway/netmask are
required. I am looking at an old test case which creates shared
network without IP range
and deploys vm in it. It of course fails as IP range is
On 11/07/13 2:33 PM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:27:28PM +0530, Girish Shilamkar wrote:
Hello,
In order to create shared network StartIp/endIp/gateway/netmask are
required. I am looking at an old test case which creates shared
network without IP
Hello,
In order to create shared network StartIp/endIp/gateway/netmask are required. I
am looking at an old test case which creates shared network without IP range
and deploys vm in it. It of course fails as IP range is required while creating
shared network.
Has anything related to shared
