Re: Review Request 11906: CLOUDSTACK-1047: tracking in logs using job id

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11906/#review22580 --- LGTM but clutters the log up quite a bit. - Prasanna Santhanam On

Re: Testcase Failure

Realized the problem. I hadn't change the package structure in surefire-plugin exclude configuration in pom.xml. That solved the problem. Thanks, Dharmesh On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Dharmesh Kakadia wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to switch com.cloud.network package to org.apache.network. >

Review Request 12200: Fixed issues while adding DC to zone in VM ware

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12200/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and Prasanna Santhanam. Reposit

Re: Review Request 12200: Fixed issues while adding DC to zone in VM ware

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12200/#review22581 --- tools/marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py

Re: Review Request 12200: Fixed issues while adding DC to zone in VM ware

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12200/#review22582 --- I think you were working on an old HEAD which is why most of the pep

Re: Jenkins and IRC

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:25:47AM -0700, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > >> @David, remember that nginx proxy timeout setting we discussed ages > >> ago? Would be nice to get that sorted so we can use some extra cloud > >> power on jenkins.cloudstack.org. Any ideas on how we can get that > >> done? > > >

[CI] tabnanny and pep8

It looks like the python scripts are getting mangled either by the submitter or at reviewboard. I fixed a bunch of tests (c731597) that failed in this weekend's test run because of tab issues. Going forward all test scripts will be checked for tabs and indentation issues by tabnanny http://jenkins

Re: [ACS42] Branch created

On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 04:30:45PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > I have created 4.2 branch > Reviewboard patches need to be looked at. Some of the bugs are targeted for 4.2. I applied what I could and added reviewers for some. Didn't get through it all, but will take a look again later today

Re: [ACS42] Branch created

On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 02:11:17PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 04:30:45PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > I have created 4.2 branch > > > > Reviewboard patches need to be looked at. Some of the bugs are > targeted for 4.2. I applied what I could and added revie

Re: [CI] tabnanny and pep8

+1. *tabnanny* nice name by the way :P Cheers. On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > It looks like the python scripts are getting mangled either by the > submitter or at reviewboard. I fixed a bunch of tests (c731597) that > failed in this weekend's test run because of t

Re: Review Request 11962: CLOUDSTACK-1758: SSVM tests failed due to ssh error

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11962/#review22585 --- Commit 7d72966e45d3e2f122d5b3d44e9e300bf017a593 in branch refs/head

RE: [ACS42] Branch created

> -Original Message- > From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi [mailto:sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com] > Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2013 8:34 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [ACS42] Branch created > > Hi Animesh, > Can you please let me know if commits into this branch are controlled

Re: [DISCUSS] If BVT breaks, revert the commits...

On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 12:31:31PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: > On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 12:18:17AM +, Alex Huang wrote: > >> > >> To avoid having a bunch of reverts and resubmits, the developers > >> should be able to request that

Re: [ACS42] Branch created

On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 04:29:31PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi [mailto:sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com] > > Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2013 8:34 PM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: RE: [ACS42] Branch created > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Java 7, tomcat 7 and further upgrades

On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 04:18:40PM -0400, John Burwell wrote: > All, > > I am +1 for Java7. However, I would like to propose ridding > ourselves of Tomcat entirely and embedding a network stack such as > Netty (http://netty.io) with a servlet bridge. We have one JSP in > the system that generate

Re: Master build problem

On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 06:47:22AM +, Paul Angus wrote: > Is this fix in the new 4.2 branch? I'm getting the following error when > trying to log in to the management UI. (UI reports 'Invalid Username or > Password') > > 2013-06-30 07:12:33,779 DEBUG [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] > (cata

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Moving cloudmonkey to its own repository, have its own release process

On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 9:47 PM, David Nalley wrote: > Rohit: > > Do you plan on generating a cloudmonkey release? (and acting as the > RM?, should be comparatively simple, but we might need to document > it.) > Sure, why not. I can be the initial RM. We can document the process on wiki which sh

Re: [ACS42] Branch created

On Jun 30, 2013, at 12:39 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 04:29:31PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: >> >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi [mailto:sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com] >>> Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2013 8:34 PM >>> To: dev@cloudsta

RE: Master build problem

Hi Prasanna, Here is the section from the componentContext.xml file. The username/password in the user table is admin / 0.724297075275608 The state was is "disabled" by default I changed it to enabled but it didn't make a difference.

Re: Jenkins and IRC

On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:25:47AM -0700, Hugo Trippaers wrote: >> >> @David, remember that nginx proxy timeout setting we discussed ages >> >> ago? Would be nice to get that sorted so we can use some extra cloud >> >> power on jenkins.c

Re: On git 4.1 (4.1.1-SNAPSHOT), jetty:run fails because of database version errors

Great. Both the OSS and non-OSS builds fine on the 4.1 branch now! Tested on OS X 10.6.8 and CentOS 6.3. But here's another flaw in DB upgrade: The upgrade writes the timestamp in UTC+0 time zone in MySQL (in 4.1, 4.2, master): [4.1] mysql> select * from version; ++-+-

Re: Test Result for test-smoke-matrix #559

Here's the latest run, there are only 7 failures left to have a fully successful run. Test Run: #561 Total:94 Fail :7 Skip :2 name passfailskip test_vm_life_cycle/ 10 0 0 test_glo

4.2 branch with devcloud not working properly.

Hi all, checked out 4.2 branch today. New build, deploydb and start management server. then deploysvr... on the management server terminal logs, I can see a new exception that wasn't on master last week. ERROR [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (consoleproxy-1:) Failed to start instance VM[Con

[DISCUSS] unanswered questions

H, This might be more appropriate on the marketing list but it concerns contents here; Between Thursday and Saturday 6 questions where posed on this list that have not been replied to. Starting to work on cloudstack this happened to me as well a couple of times. Given that people take the trouble

Re: 4.2 branch with devcloud not working properly.

On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 02:26:26PM +0900, Thomas O'Dowd wrote: > Hi all, > > checked out 4.2 branch today. New build, deploydb and start management > server. then deploysvr... on the management server terminal logs, I can > see a new exception that wasn't on master last week. > > The system vms

Re: [DISCUSS] unanswered questions

On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 07:34:00AM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H, > > This might be more appropriate on the marketing list but it concerns > contents here; Between Thursday and Saturday 6 questions where posed on > this list that have not been replied to. Starting to work on cloudstack > this ha

Re: [DISCUSS] unanswered questions

On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 07:34:00AM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > H, > > > > This might be more appropriate on the marketing list but it concerns > > contents here; Between Thursday and Saturday 6 questions where posed on > > this list

Re: Review Request 12184: Fix for defect CLOUDSTACK-2927

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12184/#review22587 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Likitha Shetty On June 29, 2013, 12:28 a.m.,

Re: Suggestion needed for CLOUDSTACK-212

Hi David, I have submitted a patch yesterday. It migrates com.cloud.network o org.apache.network. Please let me know if this is fine so that I can go on for the rest of the packages. Thanks, Dharmesh On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 10:09 PM, David Nalley wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:05 AM, Seba

Re: Review Request 12184: Fix for defect CLOUDSTACK-2927

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12184/#review22588 --- Commit b4f6b57ef5242a2faf9df386aaff6e00ad388e03 in branch refs/heads

Re: [DISCUSS] unanswered questions

On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 07:57:11AM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 07:34:00AM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > > H, > > > > > > This might be more appropriate on the marketing list but it concerns > > > contents

Re: Review Request 12184: Fix for defect CLOUDSTACK-2927

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12184/#review22589 --- Commit 9b722f4ccc0f6fb3ee4a34297593fe01fc23b4d7 in branch refs/heads

changing bug severity

I've noticed bugs change severity from Major->Critical->Blocker and vice-versa without reason. Can the bug reporters please mention the reason as to how something : a) blocks movement on the feature/installation/cloudstack in general b) affects deployment and does not have workarounds via the API

Re: Master build problem

On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 07:14:38PM +, Paul Angus wrote: > Hi Prasanna, > > Here is the section from the componentContext.xml file. The > username/password in the user table is admin / 0.724297075275608 > > The state was is "disabled" by default I changed it to enabled but it didn't > make