Re: Current status of IPv6 in Basic Networking

Thanks Wido, It's cool seeing update like this! On Dec 20, 2016 15:48, "Wido den Hollander" wrote: > Hi, > > Just wanted to give an update on my IPv6 progress since my last [0] update. > > The Wiki [1] still contains the most data about this, but the first PR [2] > is already

Current status of IPv6 in Basic Networking

Hi, Just wanted to give an update on my IPv6 progress since my last [0] update. The Wiki [1] still contains the most data about this, but the first PR [2] is already open which should fix CLOUDSTACK-9359 [3]. When PR #1700 merges (I hope in to 4.10!) I will submit a second PR which brings

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1842: CLOUDSTACK-9686: Fixed multiple entires for b...

GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1842 CLOUDSTACK-9686: Fixed multiple entires for builtin template in template store ref table so builtin template is never downloaded completely In handleSysTemplateDownload method creating

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1837: [4.9] Smoketest Health

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1837 @rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos6) has been kicked to run smoke tests --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1837: [4.9] Smoketest Health

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1837 @blueorangutan test centos7 kvm-centos6 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1843: WIP: instrumeted code

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1843 Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-405 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #977: [4.9] CLOUDSTACK-8746: VM Snapshotting implementation...

Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/977 rebased with latest master --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1843: WIP: instrumeted code

GitHub user abhinandanprateek opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1843 WIP: instrumeted code WIP You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack CLOUDSTACK-9687 Alternatively you

Re: patchviasocket seems to be broken with qemu 2.3(+?)

On 2016-12-20 17:53, Wei ZHOU wrote: Hi Synhrul, Could you upload the /var/log/cloud.log ? Sure:- Working router VM: http://pastebin.com/hwwk86ve Non-working router VM: http://pastebin.com/G4nv09ab Thanks. -Wei 2016-12-20 3:18 GMT+01:00 Syahrul Sazli Shaharir : On

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1843: WIP: instrumeted code

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1843 @abhinandanprateek a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1843: WIP: instrumeted code

Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1843 @blueorangutan package --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

Re: patchviasocket seems to be broken with qemu 2.3(+?)

Hi Synhrul, Could you upload the /var/log/cloud.log ? -Wei 2016-12-20 3:18 GMT+01:00 Syahrul Sazli Shaharir : > On 2016-12-19 18:10, Syahrul Sazli Shaharir wrote: > >> On 2016-12-19 17:03, Linas Žilinskas wrote: >> >>> From the logs it doesn't seem that the script timeouts.

Re: patchviasocket seems to be broken with qemu 2.3(+?)

Hi Linas, Good to know it. It looks increase the listening time in /etc/init.d/cloud-early-config will fix it (default is 5 times * 2 seconds). -Wei 2016-12-20 9:23 GMT+01:00 Linas Žilinskas : > I don't think the issue is the same. As i mentioned in the original report >

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1840: CLOUDSTACK-9685: delete snapshot on primary a...

GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1840 CLOUDSTACK-9685: delete snapshot on primary associated with a volume … …when that volume is deleted as that snapshot will never be going to use again and also it will fill

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1837: [4.9] Smoketest Health

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1837 Trillian test result (tid-692) Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7 Total time taken: 29989 seconds Marvin logs:

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1841: CLOUDSTACK-9684 Invalid zone id error while l...

GitHub user sateesh-chodapuneedi opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1841 CLOUDSTACK-9684 Invalid zone id error while listing vmware zone Issue = While listing datacenters associated with a zone, only zone Id validation is required.

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711 @rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + xenserver-65sp1) has been kicked to run smoke tests --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711 @blueorangutan test centos7 xenserver-65sp1 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

Re: patchviasocket seems to be broken with qemu 2.3(+?)

I don't think the issue is the same. As i mentioned in the original report and my findings afterwards, this is a specifically qemu issue which was fixed in 2.4.0-rc3. The issue was the way qemu exposes the socket to communicate with VM. It didn't queue data, so unless the VM was listening on