Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.2.0 (RC2)

2017-01-03 Thread Rohit Yadav
Hi Bruno, Can you try again now? Regards. From: Milamber Sent: 03 January 2017 13:42:14 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.2.0 (RC2) Hello, The 4.9.2.0-RC20170103T1228 branch and the commit seems

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.2.0 (RC2)

2017-01-03 Thread Milamber
It's ok now. Thanks. On 03/01/2017 08:36, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi Bruno, Can you try again now? Regards. From: Milamber Sent: 03 January 2017 13:42:14 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.2.0 (RC2)

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1871: [4.9] CLOUDSTACK-9692: Fix password server issue in ...

2017-01-03 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1871 @rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1819: CLOUDSTACK-9653 The system capacity was not getting ...

2017-01-03 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1819 @blueorangutan test --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1819: CLOUDSTACK-9653 The system capacity was not getting ...

2017-01-03 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1819 @rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1871: [4.9] CLOUDSTACK-9692: Fix password server issue in ...

2017-01-03 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1871 @blueorangutan test --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.2.0 (RC2)

2017-01-03 Thread Rohit Yadav
Yes Marty. Regards. From: Marty Godsey Sent: 04 January 2017 05:46:56 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.2.0 (RC2) Did the XenServer7 support make it in? Regards, Marty Godsey nSource Solutions

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1836: [4.10/master] Smoketest Health

2017-01-03 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1836 @rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos6 mgmt + xs65sp1, centos7 mgmt + vmware55u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests --- If your project is set up for

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1836: [4.10/master] Smoketest Health

2017-01-03 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1836 @blueorangutan test matrix --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.2.0 (RC2)

2017-01-03 Thread Wido den Hollander
+1 (binding) Re-tested my previous tests for the RC1 vote and checked if the .DEB packages will build. Also checked the changes and based my vote on that. > Op 3 januari 2017 om 8:05 schreef Rohit Yadav : > > > Hi All, > > I've created a 4.9.2.0 release (RC2), with the

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack issue #1741: Updated StrongSwan VPN Implementation

2017-01-03 Thread Will Stevens
I will do a final round of testing in the next couple days and squash the commits as you asked. Sorry for the delay. It has been running in prod for the last month or so and it is going well. Strongswan does not support leaving the DH group empty. Should I remove that as an option from the UI

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1819: CLOUDSTACK-9653 The system capacity was not getting ...

2017-01-03 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1819 Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✖debian. JID-442 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.2.0 (RC2)

2017-01-03 Thread Milamber
Hello, The 4.9.2.0-RC20170103T1228 branch and the commit seems doesn't exists? ✔ ~/CloudStack/cloudstack-dev [master|✔] 08:10 $ git remote -v apachehttps://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git (fetch) apachehttps://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git (push)

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1864: CLOUDSTACK-9710: Switch to using JDK 1.8

2017-01-03 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1864 Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-440 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1887: schema: Fix upgrade issue for 4.9.1.0->4.9.2.0

2017-01-03 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1887 Merged this based on discretion and manual tests. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1864: CLOUDSTACK-9710: Switch to using JDK 1.8

2017-01-03 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1864 @blueorangutan package --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1864: CLOUDSTACK-9710: Switch to using JDK 1.8

2017-01-03 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1864 @rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1847: CLOUDSTACK-9691: Fixed unhandeled excetion in list s...

2017-01-03 Thread nvazquez
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1847 Hi @anshul1886, We addressed the same issue along with @serg38 in PR #1735. We proposed a way to fix the problem on it. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack issue #1741: Updated StrongSwan VPN Implementation

2017-01-03 Thread Will Stevens
I am going to try something today to see if I can try to find a way to support non-DH connections. I will let you know. On Jan 3, 2017 9:02 AM, "rhtyd" wrote: > Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741 > > @swill

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1864: CLOUDSTACK-9710: Switch to using JDK 1.8 and Strongs...

2017-01-03 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1864 Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-443 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1741: Updated StrongSwan VPN Implementation

2017-01-03 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741 @swill thanks, looking forward to getting this in 4.10. I'm not sure about any side-effects and regressions of the DH-group related change, I think if it's not supported we should remove the

[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-admin issue #41: 50% of the doc strings are translated into ...

2017-01-03 Thread pdion891
Github user pdion891 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/41 @rhtyd @swill @jburwell, Does any of you would know if the header file is correct, for .po files? I think the copyright line must be removed, ``` # SOME

[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-admin issue #41: 50% of the doc strings are translated into ...

2017-01-03 Thread lmrv
Github user lmrv commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/41 Hi @pdion891 Good news. It's nice that the build work fine. I am waiting for your confirmation about the licence terms to modify my work. Antoine. --- If your project

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1735: CLOUDSTACK-9570: Bug in listSnapshots for sna...

2017-01-03 Thread nvazquez
Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1735#discussion_r94412144 --- Diff: api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/snapshot/ListSnapshotsCmd.java --- @@ -115,8 +115,10 @@ public void execute() {

[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-admin issue #41: 50% of the doc strings are translated into ...

2017-01-03 Thread pdion891
Github user pdion891 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/41 Hi @lmrv, I've built the site in FR and reviewing the doc... So far I've only found a minor issue: header of .po files are improper, it should be the apache2 license. --- If

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1847: CLOUDSTACK-9691: Fixed unhandeled excetion in list s...

2017-01-03 Thread mike-tutkowski
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1847 Let me provide a bit of background on this and then we can decide which way we want to correct this side effect. Here is the PR that went in a while ago that enabled CloudStack

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.2.0 (RC2)

2017-01-03 Thread Marty Godsey
Did the XenServer7 support make it in? Regards, Marty Godsey nSource Solutions -Original Message- From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2017 5:39 AM To: Rohit Yadav ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1837: [4.9] Smoketest Health

2017-01-03 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1837 Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-445 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1837: [4.9] Smoketest Health

2017-01-03 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1837 @rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1837: [4.9] Smoketest Health

2017-01-03 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1837 @blueorangutan package --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1836: [4.10/master] Smoketest Health

2017-01-03 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1836 @blueorangutan package --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1836: [4.10/master] Smoketest Health

2017-01-03 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1836 @rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1836: [4.10/master] Smoketest Health

2017-01-03 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1836 Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-444 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1832: CLOUDSTACK-9652 Job framework - Cancelling async job...

2017-01-03 Thread karuturi
Github user karuturi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1832 @rhtyd I dont buy that argument. Just for the ease of revert or cherry-pick we shouldnt commit all the changes together. The revert or cherry-pick quickly becomes irrelevant as more code gets