iceteabottle commented on issue #7: [WIP] Feature/vm wizard
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/7#issuecomment-561617458
I re-thought our search solution and added a custom search view instead of
filtering over all tabs. I think this is more intuitiv.
Default tab v
Hi,
As a user of Proxmox, I am quite happy with how they got certain things
right. ZFS, CEPH, HA, efficient backups etc are all very nice features.
It's giving ESXi a run for its money in certain circles.
It'd be great if we could orchestrate Proxmox hypervisors/clusters with
Cloudstack.
Hap
onitake opened a new pull request #10: Fix incorrect path for injected git
version tags
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/10
The k8s packages contain a set of variables that are intended to be filled
with Git version information at build time.
These are
onitake commented on issue #9: [WIP] Support loadBalancerSourceRanges
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/9#issuecomment-561669205
@josvo Ready to be tested.
This is an automated message from th
onitake opened a new pull request #11: Don't copy the whole build context from
build to runtime container
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/11
At the moment, the whole build context including sources is copied from the
build container to the runtime contain
onitake commented on issue #9: [WIP] Support loadBalancerSourceRanges
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/9#issuecomment-561718242
Test results:
- Upon creating new load balancer rules or changing ports/protocols, the
firewall rules are created
- Old en
RitchieVincent commented on a change in pull request #54: [WIP] Infrasummary SSL
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/54#discussion_r354006741
##
File path: src/views/infra/InfraSummary.vue
##
@@ -115,17 +211,109 @@ export default {
this.loading =
RitchieVincent commented on issue #54: [WIP] Infrasummary SSL
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/54#issuecomment-561859376
> Changes requested:
>
> * Refactor the api method as advised
> * Use a chained polling mechanism based on the API/task complete if there
On 12/4/19 3:20 PM, Nux! wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As a user of Proxmox, I am quite happy with how they got certain things
> right. ZFS, CEPH, HA, efficient backups etc are all very nice features.
> It's giving ESXi a run for its money in certain circles.
> It'd be great if we could orchestrate Proxmox
