On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 04:07:08PM +, Min Chen wrote:
Json deserialization issue is caused by out-of-dated systemvm.iso on your
hypervisor host. You need rebuilding systemvm.iso and deployed to your
hypervisor host.
CLOUDSTACK-3137 exists and seems to be a problem with HA and
systemVMs.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11627/
---
(Updated June 28, 2013, 8:24 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Kishan
Hi,
On 06/27/2013 12:36 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
Hey everyone,
Back in February 2013 Oracle announced the end of public support for java 1.6
already. Today we are still using java 1.6 as our supported platform. I've been
looking at the next generation of linux distributions (well mainly at
Hi all,
I was trying to use the git 4.1 branch to run non-OSS CloudStack from
source. My commands were:
(1) Put the neccessary jars in deps
(2) Run deps/install-non-oss.sh with success
(3) $ mvn clean install -DskipTests=true -Dnonoss
(4) $ mvn -P developer -pl developer -Ddeploydb
(5) $ mvn -pl
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:27:42AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 05:25:08AM +, Rayees Namathponnan wrote:
List VLAN range API call failed with null pointer exception in
latest build from master and master-6-17-stable branch build,
SSVM and router test
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12156/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh and Sateesh Chodapuneedi.
Bugs:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12110/
---
(Updated June 28, 2013, 9:13 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11992/
---
(Updated June 28, 2013, 9:18 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang,
On June 27, 2013, 6:05 p.m., edison su wrote:
server/src/com/cloud/storage/StoragePoolAutomationImpl.java, line 355
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11992/diff/2/?file=312675#file312675line355
What am trying to say is to move the following codee to
storagepoolautomationimpl:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12107/#review22501
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Abhinandan Prateek
On June 27, 2013, 9:26
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12158/
---
Review request for cloudstack and edison su.
Repository: cloudstack-git
On June 17, 2013, 1:07 p.m., Chip Childers wrote:
Radhika,
Was this committed? If so, can you please close this review? If not,
what's needed to help get it done?
Radhika PC wrote:
Hi Chip,
There are many question unanswered. You can check the comments section of
Ian, if the pdf you link to in that post was created with publican
It wasn't, just an export from a confluence wiki. I'll convert it and
submit it as a patch to the review board at some stage(tomorrow
maybe...)
can you resend the link, the paste id is broken.
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Maurice Lawler maurice.law...@me.comwrote:
Hello gang, I appreciate the help I've had thus far; I am toying with
advanced network on my test server, however; setting it up, to what I
believe is correct, I am
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12111/
---
(Updated June 28, 2013, 11:26 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and
Hi all,
I am using a management server and hence db server on remote host which is
not local.
While running test cases, Whenever I try to get the dbclient, it throws
error Access denied for user 'username@ip' (using password: YES)
While I have kept the Db server ip, username and password values
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 05:26:31PM +0530, Gaurav Aradhye wrote:
Hi all,
I am using a management server and hence db server on remote host which is
not local.
While running test cases, Whenever I try to get the dbclient, it throws
error Access denied for user 'username@ip' (using password:
Regards,
Gaurav | +919028496765
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 05:26:31PM +0530, Gaurav Aradhye wrote:
Hi all,
I am using a management server and hence db server on remote host which
is
not local.
While running test
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12063/#review22506
---
Commit 75d860b3ac03e7bec2d8849859584654bfb7d801 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12079/#review22505
---
Commit 98b47ab4667e57e110faa88a71ce2f78a2161a8b in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12136/#review22504
---
Commit 11a28aae455ba070a8afa105a51a758a78762f9e in branch
All,
While reviewing the solidfire patch, I noticed that a dummy getter/setter
implementations with TODO comments in the PrimaryDataStoreImpl in were merged
into master. I have opened a defect [1] for this issue, as the code will not
work as expected (they are not actually working with the
Ideally I would like to see all validation to be done on feature branch - BVTs
and also manual validation of the P1 test cases from VM Sync test plan just
like object store validation - sadhu has signed up for it along with Ilya. This
would help us to identify feature specific issues.
We are
Merge. AFAIK, it's already merged to Master
Retest? I'm out of the loop. I'm working on adding Hyper-V to Master, and not
the current release.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: 28 June 2013 3:57 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Hi All,
Is there any patch file for cloudstack-4.1 to added xenserver-6.2.0 .
I knew that
plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xen/discoverer/XcpServerDiscoverer.java
this file plays vital role to added xenserver-6.2.0 but it support only upto
6.1 do u guys have any patch
Nitin,
Yes, given a guestos id of a VM, we can get if it supports hotadd of memory or
cpu.
I can provide a method to do this.
Regards,
Sateesh
From: Nitin Mehta
Sent: 27 June 2013 17:54
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Kelven Yang; Sateesh Chodapuneedi
Subject: vmware help for dynamic scaling
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11479/#review22508
---
api/src/com/cloud/offering/DiskOffering.java
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:28:17AM +, Edison Su wrote:
Hi Prasanna, thanks for your great effort to get simulator work. I
reviewed all your changes, looks good to me, while there is only one
thing that I don't like: the implementation of
SimulatorImageStoreDriverImpl, so I rewrote it with
Prasanna, glad to know that CLOUDSTACK-3137 is resolved. I fixed
CLOUDSTACK-3249 yesterday for a corner case reported by Alena, but I could
not reproduce CLOUDSTACK-3137 on my environment at all. For the JSON
issue, I can only tell that it is inconsistent systemvm issue between
management server
Hi John,
OK, this sounds good.
I updated from master yesterday and was resolving some (major) conflicts
last night and this morning. I want to get in some more testing before I
commit.
Sounds good on the points you make. It should be, as you say, easy to
resolve them.
Thanks,
Mike
On Fri,
Heya,
I've added a parameterised job to jenkins that will run a complete build on any
branch. You can kick it off on jenkins.cloudstack.org and enter any branch as
the parameter. It will do the regular maven build with the clean and test
actions. It will also generate a cobertura coverage
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:09:41AM -0700, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
Heya,
I've added a parameterised job to jenkins that will run a complete
build on any branch. You can kick it off on jenkins.cloudstack.org
and enter any branch as the parameter. It will do the regular maven
build with the
I deleted all traces of systemvm.iso from my codebase
$ find . -name systemvm.iso | xargs -n1 rm -f
Then reverted my devcloud snapshot to old state and don't see this
error again.
I wonder by mvn doesn't do a good job of cleaning though :/
Thanks for the fixes to the bugs and the upcoming fixes
On Jun 28, 2013, at 10:18 AM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:09:41AM -0700, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
Heya,
I've added a parameterised job to jenkins that will run a complete
build on any branch. You can kick it off on jenkins.cloudstack.org
and enter any
Thomas,
I've written down my comment in this bug.
Jessica
-Original Message-
From: Thomas O'Dowd [mailto:tpod...@cloudian.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 8:04 PM
To: Min Chen
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Jessica Wang
Subject: Re: Query String Request Authentication(QSRA) support
Anything special required to do this POST? Just read this thread when
searching for userdata 2k and noticed that POST is supposed to be
supported, but if I run the following it doesn't work:
curl --request POST 'http://localhost:8096/client/api' --data
'command=listVirtualMachines'
On Wed, Apr
Devcloud has a trick to clean up systemvm.iso:
There is a bug in xapi on Ubuntu/debian(not sure the bug still there in the
latest debian or not), which can't attach an ISO to a VM. I worked around the
bug by creating a VDI on primary storage, copy systemvm iso into that VDI, then
attach the vdi
Hey Prasanna,
I just did a quick test, these systemvm.iso files are generated by the default
maven build (mvm -Dnonoss -Psystemvm install)
./client/target/cloud-client-ui-4.2.0-SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/vms/systemvm.iso
./client/target/generated-webapp/WEB-INF/classes/vms/systemvm.iso
On June 28, 2013, 5:52 p.m., Devdeep Singh wrote:
Ship It!
Committed in 78922589bbdc7914b9d4ce3b97a9fcf03d4b7b57. Kindly close the request
- Devdeep
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 05:38:19PM +, Edison Su wrote:
Devcloud has a trick to clean up systemvm.iso:
There is a bug in xapi on Ubuntu/debian(not sure the bug still there
in the latest debian or not), which can't attach an ISO to a VM. I
worked around the bug by creating a VDI on primary
Meng,
I am not sure where you stand on this, but you should not use VLANs.
Just setup a basic zone (no vlans needed) , use the packages from the
repository and don't even try to compile from source.
All information should be in the installation guide (not the quick install
guide, which is not
So a little update on the hot-deployable API front:
It works…I think. I've been able to package my code into a jar deploy it to a
pre-comipiled CloudStack. All I had to do was:
-Compile the client
-Add a bean for my PluggableService to applicationContext.xml
-Add my command permissions to the
Just running some devcloud tests and my physicalnetwork won't be
enabled? Looks like a regression. Anyone else seeing this?
I'll have to find the checkin to be reverted if so.
--
Prasanna.,
Powered by BigRock.com
Do you mind writing up the process on the wiki or in a blog post (or both?)
--David
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 2:56 PM, SuichII, Christopher
chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
So a little update on the hot-deployable API front:
It works…I think. I've been able to package my code into a jar deploy it
Sure thing! I'll be on vacation next week but will document the process a
little more and write something up the following week. If you have a more
urgent need than that, feel free to shoot me an email.
-Chris
On Jun 28, 2013, at 3:07 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us
wrote:
Do you mind
Hi Ram / Manan,
Devdeep added you to a meeting to discuss Hyper-V development on Tuesday.
If you've not already received it, the agenda is outlined below.
DL
-Original Message-
From: Donal Lafferty
Sent: 28 June 2013 10:17 AM
To: Devdeep Singh
Cc: Will Chan; Kevin Kluge
Subject:
Yes seeing this issue too.
Checked the code and looks like a regression due to the following commit.
---
Author: Bharat Kumar (bharat.ku...@citrix.com)
Author date:2 days ago (Wed Jun 26 20:55:30 2013 +0530)
Commit hash:7f2f25d640b47c8e72381bfc318a71ca2bfd
Pl do revert if it doesn't cause other issues.
-Original Message-
From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 1:44 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: On master updatephysicalnetwork won't enable the phy. net?
Yes seeing this issue too.
Hi List,
How would I force all connections to go over https/8443, alternatively, I can
just stop running 8080, but it would be nice to push all traffic from 8080 to
8443.
Thanks
ilya
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12180/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers, Devdeep Singh, Kelven Yang, and
I have reverted the commit 7f2f25d640b47c8e72381bfc318a71ca2bfd
-Original Message-
From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 2:00 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: On master updatephysicalnetwork won't enable the phy. net?
Pl
Folks
Today is the feature freeze date, if you plan to get your features into 4.2 it
needs to be in master today. I will cut 4.2 branch tomorrow morning PST.
Thanks
Animesh
Hi Animesh,
Just to make sure I'm dealing with the correct repo, I pushed my code to
master here:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git
This is where I fetch from, but I had not done a push there until today, so
I just wanted to make sure it was the correct location (i.e. not a
Thats the one git to bind them :-)
Congrats on the first commit
Cheers,
Hugo
On Jun 28, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
Hi Animesh,
Just to make sure I'm dealing with the correct repo, I pushed my code to
master here:
Thanks!
It's great to have the code in place now. :)
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nl wrote:
Thats the one git to bind them :-)
Congrats on the first commit
Cheers,
Hugo
On Jun 28, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
Yes that's the one
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 4:07 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS42] Feature Freeze reminder
Hi Animesh,
Just to make sure I'm dealing with the correct repo, I
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12131/#review22548
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- edison su
On June 28, 2013, 7:46 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12131/#review22547
---
Commit 58f9202818ffe78f3cd6748fc8710433d11bd5a2 in branch
Nice! Thanks for your great work, now we will have first primary storage plugin
in 4.2.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 4:07 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS42] Feature Freeze reminder
Hi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12101/#review22549
---
Commit 1659ee225c936b074bae1ede955194f60c546c02 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12101/#review22550
---
Commit 9e4b4a707f433d30c4513926cbdbb352d527ed55 in branch
After Dave's complain in the vmsync [MERGE] thread about BVT in horrible shape
on master, I went around to figure out what exactly happened. The best I can
figure is that after a certain merge (I will leave out which merge as that's
not important), BVT no longer runs automatically. It was
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12130/#review22551
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Rayees Namathponnan
On June 27, 2013, 7:30
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12184/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prachi Damle.
Repository: cloudstack-git
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12184/
---
(Updated June 29, 2013, 12:28 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Prachi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12101/#review22554
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On June 26, 2013, 7:58 a.m.,
On June 29, 2013, 12:29 a.m., Devdeep Singh wrote:
Ship It!
Kindly close the review request
- Devdeep
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12101/#review22554
Alex,
+1
From the jenkins side we could make more jobs with parameters so anyone can
kick-off a test run on his/her branch. I don't know if that would work for the
BVT tests though.
This only thing i'm a bit afraid of is the technical side of reverting a merge.
It's one of those this that
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12180/
---
(Updated June 29, 2013, 12:48 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chip
This only thing i'm a bit afraid of is the technical side of reverting a
merge. It's
one of those this that you need to be careful with in git.
I think this means all merges must come in as one big squashed patch. If they
come in as multiple commits or rebase, then it gets reverted
Given the current state of BVT, I don't think we can reliably merge this into
master. It will have to wait for 4.3. I apologize to those who really want to
see this feature in. I myself have slaved over this for some weeks, including
missing the collab conference, but I just cannot
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11953/
---
(Updated June 29, 2013, 2:35 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Hi,
As suggested on the users mailing list, I ask this question again
here...
I've managed it to install CloudStack on Virtualbox: One VM with Ubuntu
where the management server is installed as described in the official
documentation (.deb packages) and a DevCloud2 VM which acts as
Hey Ryan,
This is left-over from older versions. The nonoss build used to be a premium
build and had a few differences in the database. Hence the two different
database upgrade classes.
It should go away soon :-)
Cheers,
Hugo
Sent from my iPhone
On 28 jun. 2013, at 20:46, Ryan Lei
Hi,
I got the same issue. Log say there is no secondary storage... and I see
no record for ssvm in host table in DB.
I cc your question to dev maillist. Anyone can help?
Sent from my GT-N7000
On 29 Jun 2013 03:30, Tim Schultheiss tschulthe...@dynamicquest.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I have a CS 4.1
Awesome, I'll send the report of the trend this week of the bvt.
Thanks,
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 01:08:58AM +, Min Chen wrote:
Prasanna, all those 4 object_store related bugs should have been fixed in
master, I tested 3 templates related bugs by running marvin test suite
test_template.py
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 12:18:17AM +, Alex Huang wrote:
After Dave's complain in the vmsync [MERGE] thread about BVT in
horrible shape on master, I went around to figure out what exactly
happened. The best I can figure is that after a certain merge (I
will leave out which merge as that's
77 matches
Mail list logo
