Hi,
Developer Guide API section is ready for review. The doc is attached at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3546
Please see section4.1. What's New in the API for 4.2, and provide your
feedback.
Also, please let me know other than the API changes what you think what should
Hi,
Limiting Resource Usage is ready for review. The doc is attached at
CLOUDSTACK-713https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-713
Please see section 14.4. Limiting Resource Usage (118), and provide your
feedback.
Regards
-Radhika
Jira is up now.
Looks like there was an issue with plugin and somebody Fixed it.
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
-Original Message-
From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 12:19 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: is jira down. ?
On Aug. 2, 2013, 10:29 a.m., Jayapal Reddy wrote:
test/integration/component/test_egress_fw_rules.py, line 55
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12934/diff/4/?file=332296#file332296line55
I appreciate your effort in correcting the test cases.
There are few comments from my side.
+1. Provided git allows to make a specific file as read-only.
-Original Message-
From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 12:01 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Saksham Srivastava
Subject: Re: Reverting 17267794adb2bab923fb20515a7b943780d61921
Hi guys,
Is anyone concerned about using XenServer 6.2's clone-on-boot feature on
CloudStack? With it, we can quickly deploy a huge of VMs from a single
golden template. This is amazing for some scenarios. For example: we can
allocate a special/dedicated cluster with only one golden template. And
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: 02 August 2013 23:36
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [jira] make affectedVersion field mandatory.
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 11:06:53AM +, Ram Ganesh wrote:
Hi,
While triaging
Jira is down again.
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 05-Aug-2013, at 12:25 PM, Rajesh Battala
rajesh.batt...@citrix.commailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com
wrote:
Jira is up now.
Looks like there was an issue with plugin and somebody Fixed it.
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
-Original Message-
From: Rajesh
Hi all,
Suppose I create affinity group and deploy vm which obeys this affinity
rule.
Now If I delete the affinity group even when it's in use by the vm, it gets
deleted , and then I can't see that affinity group in vm's affinity group
list.
Is this a valid behavior? One of the test cases tries
H,
What is the status of 4.1.1 at this moment. I am getting several
reports of api calls not working as before. I saw the vote passing by
but didn't give them much attention. In jira I don't see much mention
of such issues. Is this noticed by anybosy else?
regards,
Daan
The comments are incorporated.
Please see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-850
-Radhika
-Original Message-
From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2013 1:54 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; Sudha Ponnaganti
+1.
It would be good to have a default field probably as well ?
I would also want to have the fixVersion having default field and the
release manager accordingly triaging it.
I recently saw some of my bugs missed this information and the UI team
didn't notice it.
On 05/08/13 12:57 PM, Ram Ganesh
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13240/
---
(Updated Aug. 5, 2013, 9:36 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Sheng
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12934/#review24640
---
test/integration/component/test_egress_fw_rules.py
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/
---
(Updated Aug. 5, 2013, 9:57 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13240/
---
(Updated Aug. 5, 2013, 9:59 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep
Hi All,
is 4.1.1 officially released?
Where are / will be the RPMs and documentation for upgrading form 4.1.0?
Regards,
F.
H,
What is the policy for adding upgrade paths?
I am working on upgrade from 4.1.1 already.
So when do we add
_upgradeMap.put(4.1.1, new DbUpgrade[] { new
Upgrade410to420(), new Upgrade420to430() });
to DatabaseUpgradeChecker?
thanks,
Daan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/
---
(Updated Aug. 5, 2013, 10:38 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, edison su
Hi All,
Am not able to view any link of cwiki.
Am getting permission denied to view any content.
Please let me know how to resolve this issue.
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
Hi,
No, it's not out there yet.
The RPM and Deb packages will come online when the source has been released.
It will be a minor upgrade, so it will just be a matter of installing
the new packages and restarting the services.
Wido
On 08/05/2013 12:20 PM, France wrote:
Hi All,
is 4.1.1
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13266/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh and Prachi Damle.
Bugs: 3925
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13266/#review24641
---
Review 13266 failed the build test : FAILURE
The url of build
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12358/
---
(Updated Aug. 5, 2013, 11:12 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Nitin
+1, Although I did not add/edit/remove any sql statements in this file, it was
a blank line that got removed in my patch.
Enforcing it would prevent such slips to happen.
Saksham
-Original Message-
From: Koushik Das
Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 12:49 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org;
-Original Message-
From: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com] On Behalf
Of Rohit Yadav
Sent: 02 August 2013 22:43
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss] Making CloudMonkey simpler to use for admin tasks
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Donal
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12358/#review24643
---
Commit 506f2a4b94299e626b19c17c444b2d4b3bbcc49f in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12358/#review24644
---
Commit 40e7502bcb02a3301347f2debfb09a920306e796 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13267/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Devdeep Singh.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4075
I've able to access the wiki all day so far.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Rajesh Battala
rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi All,
Am not able to view any link of cwiki.
Am getting permission denied to view any content.
Please let me know how to resolve this issue.
Thanks
Rajesh
Yes, I able to access them too.
Rajesh, are you still can't access cwiki page? if yes, please share some
example link.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.comwrote:
I've able to access the wiki all day so far.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Rajesh Battala
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13267/#review24646
---
Commit e0c6073a80ef5c1c8cff19b86289dc872b1b36f7 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13267/#review24647
---
Commit 8845aae0bc10474bf7dd59aea7be8a50ac40f9f5 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13267/#review24648
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On Aug. 5, 2013, 12:54 p.m.,
On 31.07.2013 16:30, Chip Childers wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:04:50AM +0100, Nux! wrote:
On 14.05.2013 15:41, Chip Childers wrote:
As a way to get more user feedback on our major feature releases,
what
does everyone think about releasing one or two -beta releases for
each
major
For this the jenkins builds might be suitable. I think if those are
running on all active release branches.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
On 31.07.2013 16:30, Chip Childers wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:04:50AM +0100, Nux! wrote:
On 14.05.2013 15:41, Chip
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13268/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek, edison su, and mice xia.
On 05.08.2013 16:09, Daan Hoogland wrote:
For this the jenkins builds might be suitable. I think if those are
running on all active release branches.
Some URLs could be real handy now. :)
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
2013/8/3 Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com
On 4.1?
It's on my local branch, cloned from master but I haven't merged for
several weeks. However I concern about the reason. After re-deploying Zone,
everything is ok. Problem maybe comes from id_rsa.cloud key, which was not
patched to
think was the keyword there, ... but I am looking for ya. moment
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
On 05.08.2013 16:09, Daan Hoogland wrote:
For this the jenkins builds might be suitable. I think if those are
running on all active release branches.
Some URLs could
the 4.1 build for rhel63 says:
Apache Cloudstack RHEL 6.3 packages
This project is currently disabled
this one didn't happen to be the one you where looking for? Anyway
look at http://jenkins.cloudstack.org and browse around. I thought you
would find them there.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 5:40 PM,
I agree, I think this is by design.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Rajesh Battala (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13729580#comment-13729580
]
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13268/
---
(Updated Aug. 5, 2013, 3:59 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13269/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek, edison su, and mice xia.
On 05.08.2013 16:48, Daan Hoogland wrote:
the 4.1 build for rhel63 says:
Apache Cloudstack RHEL 6.3 packages
This project is currently disabled
this one didn't happen to be the one you where looking for? Anyway
look at http://jenkins.cloudstack.org and browse around. I thought you
would find
Daan,
Please be more specific as to which APIs don't work - and if you know what
commit could have caused it.
Thanks
ilya
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 4:43 AM
To: dev
Subject: api calls in 4.1.1
H,
What
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:42:53AM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote:
H,
What is the status of 4.1.1 at this moment. I am getting several
reports of api calls not working as before. I saw the vote passing by
but didn't give them much attention. In jira I don't see much mention
of such issues. Is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/#review24650
---
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 12:32:19PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote:
H,
What is the policy for adding upgrade paths?
I am working on upgrade from 4.1.1 already.
So when do we add
_upgradeMap.put(4.1.1, new DbUpgrade[] { new
Upgrade410to420(), new Upgrade420to430() });
to
Hi,
I was looking at my db.properties file and noticed I didn't fill in a value
for the db.root.password key.
Can someone tell me what filling in this value will change behavior wise in
CloudStack?
Thanks!
Mike
# CloudStack database settings
db.cloud.username=cloud
db.cloud.password=cloud
Hi all,
Here's where we are:
DEBs (oss) are loaded into the cloustack.apt-get.eu repo.
RPMs (nonoss) are being built now and will be pushed as soon as complete (soon)
David is building the docs now.
I'll announce once the RPM's and docs are published.
-chip
Hi Mike,
If when installing your mysql server, you set a password for the mysql root
user, you will need to specify that here. If you haven't encountered errors in
your deploydb, you probably haven't set the mysql root user password and so you
don't have to change the db.properties file.
Ah, OK, thanks.
It has been a long time since I first installed MySQL for CloudStack
development and I don't recall exactly how I set it up back then, but it
must have been without a password.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Vijayendra Bhamidipati
vijayendra.bhamidip...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/
---
(Updated Aug. 5, 2013, 6:07 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, edison su and
org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name 'kvmclock'
I've been waiting to hear what platforms will be supported in 4.2
before committing '0fa108f03895e83ccc5d4c81e058ea8f424663b9' to 4.2.
We eventually want this code, as it's a critical fix for system vm
clocks, but
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13240/#review24654
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Sheng Yang
On Aug. 5, 2013, 9:59 a.m., daan
I have not heard that Java requirement before. Is that really true?
Jessica T.
From: Prashant Sreedharan [prashant.sreedha...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 10:36 AM
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: karthik.c...@gmail.com
Subject: RE: Not
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/#review24657
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- edison su
On Aug. 5, 2013, 6:07 p.m., Wei
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/#review24656
---
Commit 0f539b4ce1b07c672a776ffa806dabb70c528afe in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/#review24659
---
Commit 1e4ff7f4532a39355ef5e5bfaa8dbfbc1f1c27e4 in branch
:) meaning now, i suppose.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 12:32:19PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote:
H,
What is the policy for adding upgrade paths?
I am working on upgrade from 4.1.1 already.
So when do we add
Hi all,
Trying to build 4.1.1 into the appropriate RPMs, and I'm hitting the
following error during the process. Any clues / ideas? I've cleaned our
~/.m2/repository and tried again, but same issue.
[INFO] Apache CloudStack AWS API Bridge .. FAILURE [55.762s]
[INFO]
Ilya,
listVirtualMachines (as user) for one, but I got a second report that
wasn't very precise yet, so I will be working on reproducing next days
and report back (wit test case or patch)
regards,
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 05,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13237/#review24653
---
engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/VolumeDaoImpl.java
Just fixing a typo... your missing the d in cloud
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/
On 5 August 2013 19:01, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
Hi all,
Here's where we are:
DEBs (oss) are loaded into the cloustack.apt-get.eu repo.
RPMs (nonoss) are being built now and will be pushed
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 08:23:48PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote:
:) meaning now, i suppose.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 12:32:19PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote:
H,
What is the policy for adding upgrade paths?
Hi,
Seems like the awsapi installation is broken for 4.1 and 4.1.1 releases. Most
of the issues have been identified and fixed in 4.2.
Here is the list to start with:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2777
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3295
On Aug. 5, 2013, 6:19 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote:
Ship It!
Pushed to 4.2 and MASTER.
- Sheng
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13240/#review24654
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13252/
---
Review request for cloudstack and John Burwell.
Bugs:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11858/#review24664
---
Commit 554c8b7ac110099cf93310660490e62ba2337f53 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11858/#review24663
---
Commit d1ede5430c052de5215dc1e7819d0d94752ede52 in branch
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 06:29:25PM +, Prachi Damle wrote:
Hi,
Seems like the awsapi installation is broken for 4.1 and 4.1.1 releases. Most
of the issues have been identified and fixed in 4.2.
Here is the list to start with:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2777
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13252/
---
(Updated Aug. 5, 2013, 6:57 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and John
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13252/
---
(Updated Aug. 5, 2013, 7:06 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and John
Is this the Intellicache feature? What changes does it require from
CloudStack.
Would just using service offering tags work?
On 8/5/13 12:23 AM, Nguyen Anh Tu ng.t...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
Is anyone concerned about using XenServer 6.2's clone-on-boot feature on
CloudStack? With it, we can
Thanks Alena! I've put in the fix, will submit the patch for review in a short
while.
Cheers!
Regards,
Vijay
From: Alena Prokharchyk
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 4:51 PM
To: Vijayendra Bhamidipati; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cannot deploy db on latest 4.1 branch
Happens because
Not exactly true. OpenJDK / IcedTea etc should work also.
On 8/5/13 11:19 AM, Jessica Tomechak jessica.tomec...@citrix.com wrote:
I have not heard that Java requirement before. Is that really true?
Jessica T.
From: Prashant Sreedharan
We got 4 +1 votes, so the vote was successful. I'll make the changes now.
Thanks peeps!
On 29 July 2013 22:55, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to make several changes to our by-laws, but before I continue,
I've prepared a changset that tidies up whitespace and hard wraps.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13008/
---
(Updated Aug. 5, 2013, 9:30 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang,
I am trying to figure out what would be the proper way for a Plugin to interact
with the CloudStack VM deployment and provide an authoritative IP Address from
its database versus the local CloudStack database. It looks like the
NetworkElements are not presented an opportunity to provide an IP
Hi dev,
I have some more by-law changes to propose. This is essentially round 2 for
these changes. I incorporated feedback from the last thread.
Per the by-laws, we're using a lazy majority for this vote. Please cast
your vote now. I will tally the results in 72 hours.
Here's my changelog:
*
Hi folks:
I'd like to propose breaking out a nuymber of our documents into their
own repos.
My thinking is that specifically; the release notes, midonet, and
niciranvp documentation shares very little with the rest of the
documentation, and should be broken out akin to how the QIG is
currently
All,
As most know, the upgrade from 4.0 to 4.1 changed the interface naming schema.
When a host in a cluster is rebooted, the interface naming changes. When this
occurs, live migration breaks to that host.
Example config:
All Management and hosts running CS 4.1.1
Hypervisor: KVM on RHEL
Yes, the vm definition already has the bridge name chosen (on initial
startup), and that definition is migrated between hosts. This is
further exacerbated by the fact that the bridges are created on the
destination host prior to migration (so they'll be ready), rather than
somehow being able to
Hi,
I've noticed in 4.2 when I try to delete a volume that's never been
attached to a VM that CloudStack says the operation was successful and the
GUI removes the volume from the table, but when I refresh the table, the
volume comes back.
Has anyone else noticed this behavior as of late?
If I
Thanks Marcus. We already thought of creating the old bridge, but we were
hoping we had better options ;-)
- Original Message -
From: Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 5:42:38 PM
Cloudstack will create the old bridges as it used to, you just need to have
a single 'cloudVirBr' device to trigger the behavior.
On Aug 5, 2013 6:35 PM, Simon Weller swel...@ena.com wrote:
Thanks Marcus. We already thought of creating the old bridge, but we were
hoping we had better options
Am still not able to access any pages.
Ex : https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/users/viewmyprofile.action
even a publicly accessable page, when I login am getting error
Not Permitted
You are not permitted to perform this operation.
Please do the needful.
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
-Original
One way to achieve this behavior is to have a call out in prepareNic() to the
NetworkElements before the call to the NetworkGuru allowing the NetworkElement
to update the Nic Profile. In this use case the Network Element would suggest
an IP Address. In the use case below the IP Address would be
Make perfect sense.
+ 1
-Radhika
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 3:13 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Breaking docs out
Hi folks:
I'd like to propose breaking out a nuymber of our documents into their own
repos.
On Aug. 5, 2013, 9:55 a.m., Jayapal Reddy wrote:
test/integration/component/test_egress_fw_rules.py, line 27
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12934/diff/5/?file=336941#file336941line27
remove the white space (red colour).
Please apply the patch in your local and make sure there is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12934/
---
(Updated Aug. 6, 2013, 4:38 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Girish
I will try on my setup
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 4:48 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Issue with deleting a volume that's never been attached to a VM
Hi,
I've noticed in 4.2 when I try to
Below defects are resolved for 4.2 - can you pl review, validate and close the
defects. If the fix is not done as per the defect logged, pl reopen the defect
so developer who fixed would get a chance to review the fix before product goes
to GA.
Reporter Total
Grand Total
I able to reproduce it.
Deleting unattached volume is coming back again.
The removed column is not update in the db for this volume.
Will create a major bug.
*** 6. row ***
id: 6
account_id: 2
Hi Rajesh,
I have created the issue some time back @ CLOUDSTACK-4038) State of the DATA
volumes remains in Allocated state if they are deleted before using them
(Attach/Detach)
Thanks,
Sailaja.M
-Original Message-
From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com]
Sent:
Already in the JIRA reports - CLOUDSTACK-4038
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 04:51:31AM +, Rajesh Battala wrote:
I able to reproduce it.
Deleting unattached volume is coming back again.
The removed column is not update in the db for this volume.
Will create a major bug.
Hi,
Thanks for the review, Likitha.
I have incorporated them. The latest doc is attached at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-817.
Abhinav, let me know if you have further comments.
Thanks
-Radhika
From: Likitha Shetty
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 11:42 AM
To: Radhika
Looks good to me Radhika. Thank you!
From: Radhika Puthiyetath
Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 11:04 AM
To: Likitha Shetty; us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org;
Abhinav Roy
Subject: RE: [Doc] Dedicated Resources: Public IPs and VLANs per Account is
Ready
Hi,
Thanks for the
100 matches
Mail list logo
