---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26494/
---
(Updated Oct. 10, 2014, 12:41 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and
On Oct. 8, 2014, 7:43 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote:
engine/storage/cache/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/cache/manager/StorageCacheManagerImpl.java,
line 228
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26263/diff/1/?file=710568#file710568line228
Code looks alright, do you need to handle case when
I was thinking about that. I shouldn't have done this upload but had a
reason to. I want to make these available for testers. maybe i can upload
them without adding them to the rpm index...?
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Perhaps we need a testing repo for non-final
Or make a different folder for unreleased versions?
That way you could upload daily builds as well if you ever wanted to
How about
- a stable/release folder, where released versions go
- a rc folder, for official release versions
- a nightly/dev folder, for either a nightly version or the
Yes that's not a bad idea. At some point we had a chat with Hugo and David
about having jenkins generate RPMs with incremented version and setup a repo
for them which lead me to believe that at least Jenkins is capable of that.
So, whoever is in charge of Jenkins, how can we achieve this?
--
Hi,
Go to the global settings and empty the console proxy and secondary
storage domain settings.
Those values should say realhostip.com now.
Restart the management server and you're done. That will disable SSL.
Wido
On 10/10/2014 05:22 AM, Amin wrote:
Hello,
Can anyone please advise
Tested the upgrade from 4.3.0 to 4.4.1 RC2 and post upgrade I'm still unable to
view cluster info so this is still a blocker for me.
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Daan
Perhaps it's just me being lazy but I reckon that having defined 'beta' and
RC packages available for download (with some form of marketing to inform
people) would likely increase the sample size for testing, including
different use cases. I'm pretty sure that there are a number of people that
fit
Hi Geoff,
It looks this commit is not in RC2, but in 4.4 and
hotfix/4.4/CLOUDSTACK-7219.
-Wei
2014-10-10 12:32 GMT+02:00 Geoff Higginbottom
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com:
Tested the upgrade from 4.3.0 to 4.4.1 RC2 and post upgrade I'm still
unable to view cluster info so this is still a
Hi Dion,
Was you testing on latest hotfix/4.4/CLOUDSTACK-7219?
git show hotfix/4.4/CLOUDSTACK-7219
the last commit should be 0b31732bb18983db6cdd747a6c2f6056cf81a85e
-Wei
2014-10-10 2:19 GMT+02:00 Pierre-Luc Dion pdion...@apache.org:
Hello Wei,
I've test the upgrade from 4.2.1 to 4.3.1
Hi Wei, from our jenkins server we used:
Revision: 0b31732bb18983db6cdd747a6c2f6056cf81a85e
refs/remotes/origin/hotfix/4.4/CLOUDSTACK-7219
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dion,
Was you testing on latest hotfix/4.4/CLOUDSTACK-7219?
git show
Do you have this in database?
mysql select * from cloud.configuration where name='xen.vm.vcpu.max';
+--+--+---+-+---+---+---+-+-++
| category |
Ofcourse it will not work in modern browsers, if you access the GUI via https,
because iframe is used.
If you access ACS GUI via http, it should work, but it is not advised to login
with plaintext.
Regards,
F.
On 10 Oct 2014, at 10:52, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
Hi,
Go to the
Adrian,
I think the forum idea has been discussed previously, unsuccessfully.
Imho the idea itself is good, but our small community might get spread too thin
between the lists and forum.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
Hi
I am new to ACS development and intend on using Cygwin as myself
contained dev+test environment. I have do something according to the docs where
in the website/wiki
and have browsed the ACS website/wiki and not found answers to the following
questions and hope you can help:
the
Adrian, the argument against publishing RCs IIRC was that we then would
need to support upgrade paths from those as well.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Adrian,
I think the forum idea has been discussed previously, unsuccessfully.
Imho the idea itself is good,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26482/#review56181
---
Can you explain why you remove the code?
// remove diskAndMemory
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2014 10:20 PM
To: Daan Hoogland
Cc: dev
Subject: Re: [ACS45]reverting commits or branching?
I agree - it makes no sense - I am working on a branch minus the latest few
features. I'm not
18 matches
Mail list logo
