[GitHub] cloudstack issue #843: Security group ingress/egress issues with xenserver 6...

2016-06-02 Thread bvbharatk 
Github user bvbharatk commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/843
  
### ACS CI BVT Run
 **Sumarry:**
 Build Number 118
 Hypervisor xenserver
 NetworkType Advanced
 Passed=73
 Failed=0
 Skipped=3

_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ 
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0


**Failed tests:**

**Skipped tests:**
test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3
test_static_role_account_acls
test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm

**Passed test suits:**
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py
test_affinity_groups_projects.py
test_portable_publicip.py
test_vpc_vpn.py
test_over_provisioning.py
test_global_settings.py
test_scale_vm.py
test_service_offerings.py
test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py
test_routers.py
test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py
test_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py
test_login.py
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_public_ip_range.py
test_multipleips_per_nic.py
test_regions.py
test_affinity_groups.py
test_network_acl.py
test_pvlan.py
test_volumes.py
test_nic.py
test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py
test_resource_detail.py
test_secondary_storage.py
test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_disk_offerings.py


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Older Ceph packages for Ubuntu 12.04 (Precise Pangolin) to recompile libvirt with RBD support

2016-06-02 Thread Cloud List 
Dear all,

I am trying to setup older version of CloudStack 4.2.0 on Ubuntu 12.04 to
use Ceph RBD as primary storage for our upgrade testing purposes. Two of
the steps involved were to add below repository to manually compile libvirt
to have RBD support, since the default libvirt on Ubuntu 12.04 doesn't have
RBD support by default, unlike on Ubuntu 14.04:


# wget -q -O- '
https://ceph.com/git/?p=ceph.git;a=blob_plain;f=keys/release.asc' | sudo
apt-key add -
OK

# echo deb http://eu.ceph.com/debian-cuttlefish/ $(lsb_release -sc) main |
sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ceph.list
deb http://eu.ceph.com/debian-cuttlefish/ precise main


But when I ran sudo apt-get update, I am receiving this error (excerpts):


Err http://eu.ceph.com precise/main amd64 Packages
  404  Not Found
Err http://eu.ceph.com precise/main i386 Packages
  404  Not Found

W: Failed to fetch
http://eu.ceph.com/debian-cuttlefish/dists/precise/main/binary-amd64/Packages
404  Not Found

W: Failed to fetch
http://eu.ceph.com/debian-cuttlefish/dists/precise/main/binary-i386/Packages
404  Not Found

E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones
used instead.


It seems that the repository for the particular required packages has been
removed, anyone can advise if I can get the required packages, may be from
a different location?

Any help is greatly appreciated.

Looking forward to your reply, thank you.

Cheers.

-ip-

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #844: CLOUDSTACK-7985: assignVM in Advanced zone with Secur...

2016-06-02 Thread bvbharatk 
Github user bvbharatk commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/844
  
### ACS CI BVT Run
 **Sumarry:**
 Build Number 117
 Hypervisor xenserver
 NetworkType Advanced
 Passed=73
 Failed=0
 Skipped=3

_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ 
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0


**Failed tests:**

**Skipped tests:**
test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3
test_static_role_account_acls
test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm

**Passed test suits:**
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py
test_affinity_groups_projects.py
test_portable_publicip.py
test_vpc_vpn.py
test_over_provisioning.py
test_global_settings.py
test_scale_vm.py
test_service_offerings.py
test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py
test_routers.py
test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py
test_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py
test_login.py
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_public_ip_range.py
test_multipleips_per_nic.py
test_regions.py
test_affinity_groups.py
test_network_acl.py
test_pvlan.py
test_volumes.py
test_nic.py
test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py
test_resource_detail.py
test_secondary_storage.py
test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_disk_offerings.py


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #847: Bug-ID: CLOUDSTACK-8880: calculate free memory on hos...

2016-06-02 Thread bvbharatk 
Github user bvbharatk commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/847
  
### ACS CI BVT Run
 **Sumarry:**
 Build Number 116
 Hypervisor xenserver
 NetworkType Advanced
 Passed=73
 Failed=0
 Skipped=3

_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ 
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0


**Failed tests:**

**Skipped tests:**
test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3
test_static_role_account_acls
test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm

**Passed test suits:**
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py
test_affinity_groups_projects.py
test_portable_publicip.py
test_vpc_vpn.py
test_over_provisioning.py
test_global_settings.py
test_scale_vm.py
test_service_offerings.py
test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py
test_routers.py
test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py
test_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py
test_login.py
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_public_ip_range.py
test_multipleips_per_nic.py
test_regions.py
test_affinity_groups.py
test_network_acl.py
test_pvlan.py
test_volumes.py
test_nic.py
test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py
test_resource_detail.py
test_secondary_storage.py
test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_disk_offerings.py


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: Introduction from Adwait

2016-06-02 Thread ilya 
Welcome!

On 5/31/16 7:07 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> welcome Adwait,
> 
> Don't forget to try out the bubble:
> https://github.com/MissionCriticalCloud/bubble-toolkit !
> good luck and have fun
> 
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Wei ZHOU  wrote:
> 
>> Welcome Adwait!
>>
>> 2016-05-30 10:54 GMT+02:00 Adwait Patankar >> :
>>
>>> Hello folks,
>>>
>>> I've joined the Accelerite CloudPlatform team recently and gearing up on
>>> the CloudStack.
>>> I'm predominantly a Java Developer and worked on different products and
>>> varied domains (Data Analytics, Backup & Recovery, IAAS Management) .
>>> My previous recent experience has been working on a heterogeneous cloud
>>> management solution supporting KVM, Xen, Hyper-V and VMWare
>> virtualization
>>> environments.
>>>
>>> I've been following the dev mailing list for CloudStack community for a
>>> few weeks and see a lot of traction with members actively participating
>> and
>>> helping each other to build a robust CloudStack ecosystem.
>>> Feeling excited to join and hopefully contribute in a meaningful way to
>>> the CloudStack community.
>>>
>>> Currently going through the publicly available videos on CloudStack
>>> features and trying out building the Devcloud setup to play around.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Adwait Patankar
>>> Principal Product Engineer | www.accelerite.com<
>> http://www.accelerite.com>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> DISCLAIMER
>>> ==
>>> This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is
>>> the property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended
>>> only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If
>>> you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read,
>> retain,
>>> copy, print, distribute or use this message. If you have received this
>>> communication in error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of
>>> this message. Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept
>> any
>>> liability for virus infected mails.
>>>
>>
> 
> 
>

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #858: CLOUDSTACK-8886: Limitations is listUsageRecords outp...

2016-06-02 Thread bvbharatk 
Github user bvbharatk commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/858
  
### ACS CI BVT Run
 **Sumarry:**
 Build Number 115
 Hypervisor xenserver
 NetworkType Advanced
 Passed=62
 Failed=2
 Skipped=3

_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ 
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0


**Failed tests:**
* test_service_offerings.py

 * ContextSuite context=TestServiceOfferings>:setup Failing since 6 runs

* test_vm_life_cycle.py

 * ContextSuite context=TestVMLifeCycle>:setup Failed


**Skipped tests:**
test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3
test_static_role_account_acls
test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm

**Passed test suits:**
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py
test_affinity_groups_projects.py
test_portable_publicip.py
test_vpc_vpn.py
test_over_provisioning.py
test_global_settings.py
test_scale_vm.py
test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py
test_routers.py
test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py
test_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py
test_login.py
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_public_ip_range.py
test_multipleips_per_nic.py
test_regions.py
test_affinity_groups.py
test_network_acl.py
test_pvlan.py
test_volumes.py
test_nic.py
test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py
test_resource_detail.py
test_secondary_storage.py
test_disk_offerings.py


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1581: CLOUDSTACK-9404 Fixed ordering of network ACL...

2016-06-02 Thread remibergsma 
Github user remibergsma commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1581#discussion_r65601112
  
--- Diff: 
core/test/com/cloud/agent/api/routing/SetNetworkACLCommandTest.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+package com.cloud.agent.api.routing;
--- End diff --

@pdube Jenkins fails because this file has no license.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #859: Bug-ID: CLOUDSTACK-8882: calculate network offering u...

2016-06-02 Thread bvbharatk 
Github user bvbharatk commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/859
  
### ACS CI BVT Run
 **Sumarry:**
 Build Number 114
 Hypervisor xenserver
 NetworkType Advanced
 Passed=73
 Failed=0
 Skipped=3

_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ 
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0


**Failed tests:**

**Skipped tests:**
test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3
test_static_role_account_acls
test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm

**Passed test suits:**
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py
test_affinity_groups_projects.py
test_portable_publicip.py
test_vpc_vpn.py
test_over_provisioning.py
test_global_settings.py
test_scale_vm.py
test_service_offerings.py
test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py
test_routers.py
test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py
test_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py
test_login.py
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_public_ip_range.py
test_multipleips_per_nic.py
test_regions.py
test_affinity_groups.py
test_network_acl.py
test_pvlan.py
test_volumes.py
test_nic.py
test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py
test_resource_detail.py
test_secondary_storage.py
test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_disk_offerings.py


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1581: CLOUDSTACK-9404 Fixed ordering of network ACL...

2016-06-02 Thread pdube 
GitHub user pdube opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1581

CLOUDSTACK-9404 Fixed ordering of network ACL rules being sent to the VR.

 The comparator was inverted.

Issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9404

In this example, I created rules with the port numbers the same as the rule 
numbers.

Chain ACL_INBOUND_eth2 (1 references)
target prot opt source   destination
ACCEPT all  --  anywhere 225.0.0.50
ACCEPT all  --  anywhere vrrp.mcast.net
DROP   tcp  --  anywhere anywhere tcp 
dpt:netstat
DROP   tcp  --  anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:10
DROP   tcp  --  anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:5
DROP   tcp  --  anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:3
DROP   tcp  --  anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:2
DROP   all  --  anywhere anywhere

We can see above that the rules are inverted.

After the fix:

Chain ACL_INBOUND_eth2 (1 references)
target prot opt source   destination
ACCEPT all  --  anywhere 225.0.0.50
ACCEPT all  --  anywhere vrrp.mcast.net
DROP   tcp  --  anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:2
DROP   tcp  --  anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:3
DROP   tcp  --  anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:5
DROP   tcp  --  anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:10
DROP   tcp  --  anywhere anywhere tcp 
dpt:netstat
DROP   all  --  anywhere anywhere


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/pdube/cloudstack network-acl-rules-order

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1581.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1581






---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-06-02 Thread bvbharatk 
Github user bvbharatk commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872
  
### ACS CI BVT Run
 **Sumarry:**
 Build Number 113
 Hypervisor xenserver
 NetworkType Advanced
 Passed=70
 Failed=3
 Skipped=3

_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ 
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0


**Failed tests:**
* test_vpc_vpn.py

 * test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn Failed

 * test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn Failed

* test_vm_life_cycle.py

 * test_10_attachAndDetach_iso Failing since 2 runs


**Skipped tests:**
test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3
test_static_role_account_acls
test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm

**Passed test suits:**
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py
test_affinity_groups_projects.py
test_portable_publicip.py
test_over_provisioning.py
test_global_settings.py
test_scale_vm.py
test_service_offerings.py
test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py
test_routers.py
test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py
test_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py
test_login.py
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_public_ip_range.py
test_multipleips_per_nic.py
test_regions.py
test_affinity_groups.py
test_network_acl.py
test_pvlan.py
test_volumes.py
test_nic.py
test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py
test_resource_detail.py
test_secondary_storage.py
test_disk_offerings.py


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1547: Fixes for VirtualRouters in Basic Networking, especi...

2016-06-02 Thread wido 
Github user wido commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1547
  
I spend some more time testing this. After the latest commits from 
@The-Loeki it all seems to work:

* Virtual Router listens on all addresses
* Apache is configured properly
* DHCP is answered correctly by the VR

The IPs are configured properly inside the VR:


root@r-10-VM:~# ip a
1: lo:  mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN 
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
2: eth0:  mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state 
UP qlen 1000
link/ether 06:ee:34:00:00:85 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 109.XX.YY.248/26 brd 109.XX.YY.255 scope global eth0
inet 109.XX.YY.149/28 brd 109.XX.YY.159 scope global eth0
inet 31.XX.YY.133/26 brd 31.XX.YY.191 scope global eth0
3: eth1:  mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state 
UP qlen 1000
link/ether 0e:00:a9:fe:00:5f brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 169.254.0.95/16 brd 169.254.255.255 scope global eth1
root@r-10-VM:~#


Apache is also working properly on both the VR and the SecStore VM:

root@r-10-VM:~# ls -l /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/
total 30
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 10230 Jun  2 13:40 vhost-109.XX.YY.248.conf
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 10230 Jun  2 13:40 vhost-109.XX.YY.149.conf
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 10230 Jun  2 13:40 vhost-31.XX.YY.133.conf
root@r-10-VM:~# apache2ctl configtest
apache2: apr_sockaddr_info_get() failed for r-10-VM
apache2: Could not reliably determine the server's fully qualified domain 
name, using 127.0.0.1 for ServerName
Syntax OK
root@r-10-VM:~# 

root@s-214-VM:~# ls -l /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/
total 10
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root26 Nov  9  2015 000-default -> 
../sites-available/default
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 10206 Jun  2 13:35 vhost-109.XX.YY.206.conf
root@s-214-VM:~# apache2ctl configtest
apache2: Could not reliably determine the server's fully qualified domain 
name, using 109.XX.YY.206 for ServerName
Syntax OK
root@s-214-VM:~#

Instances are also able to gather their metadata with cloud-init:

```
1.2.3.4 - - [02/Jun/2016:13:45:15 +] "GET 
//latest/meta-data/instance-id HTTP/1.1" 200 240 "-" "Cloud-Init/0.7.5"
1.2.3.4 - - [02/Jun/2016:13:45:15 +] "GET /latest/user-data HTTP/1.1" 
200 202 "-" "Cloud-Init/0.7.5"
1.2.3.4 - - [02/Jun/2016:13:45:15 +] "GET /latest/meta-data/ HTTP/1.1" 
200 341 "-" "Cloud-Init/0.7.5"
1.2.3.4 - - [02/Jun/2016:13:45:15 +] "GET /latest/meta-data/local-ipv4 
HTTP/1.1" 200 216 "-" "Cloud-Init/0.7.5"
1.2.3.4 - - [02/Jun/2016:13:45:15 +] "GET 
/latest/meta-data/local-hostname HTTP/1.1" 200 221 "-" "Cloud-Init/0.7.5"
1.2.3.4 - - [02/Jun/2016:13:45:15 +] "GET 
/latest/meta-data/public-hostname HTTP/1.1" 200 221 "-" "Cloud-Init/0.7.5"
1.2.3.4 - - [02/Jun/2016:13:45:15 +] "GET /latest/meta-data/public-keys 
HTTP/1.1" 200 202 "-" "Cloud-Init/0.7.5"
1.2.3.4 - - [02/Jun/2016:13:45:15 +] "GET 
/latest/meta-data/cloud-identifier HTTP/1.1" 200 253 "-" "Cloud-Init/0.7.5"
1.2.3.4 - - [02/Jun/2016:13:45:15 +] "GET 
/latest/meta-data/service-offering HTTP/1.1" 200 225 "-" "Cloud-Init/0.7.5"
1.2.3.4 - - [02/Jun/2016:13:45:15 +] "GET /latest/meta-data/public-ipv4 
HTTP/1.1" 200 216 "-" "Cloud-Init/0.7.5"
1.2.3.4 - - [02/Jun/2016:13:45:15 +] "GET /latest/meta-data/vm-id 
HTTP/1.1" 200 240 "-" "Cloud-Init/0.7.5"
1.2.3.4 - - [02/Jun/2016:13:45:15 +] "GET 
/latest/meta-data/availability-zone HTTP/1.1" 200 215 "-" "Cloud-Init/0.7.5"
1.2.3.4 - - [02/Jun/2016:13:45:15 +] "GET /latest/meta-data/instance-id 
HTTP/1.1" 200 240 "-" "Cloud-Init/0.7.5"
```

The Instance also reports this:

Cloud-init v. 0.7.5 finished at Thu, 02 Jun 2016 13:46:08 +. 
Datasource DataSourceCloudStack.  Up 62.06 seconds

As far as I can test it is all working. The commits in the PR need to be 
squashed, but to me it looks good.

I consider this PR a **BLOCKER** for 4.9 though.



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1579: CLOUDSTACK-9403 : Support for shared networks in Nua...

2016-06-02 Thread singalrahul 
Github user singalrahul commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1579
  
Added Marvin code PEP8 & PyFlakes compliance:
cloudstack$ pep8 --max-line-length=150 
test_nuage_sharednetwork_vpc_vm_monitor.py
cloudstack$ pyflakes test_nuage_sharednetwork_vpc_vm_monitor.py
cloudstack$ pep8 --max-line-length=150 test_nuage_sharednetwork_deployVM.py
cloudstack$ pyflakes test_nuage_sharednetwork_deployVM.py
cloudstack$

Validations:-
Marvin test run:
nosetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=nuage.cfg 
plugins/nuagevsp/test_nuage_sharednetwork_deployVM.py

Valiate that ROOT admin is NOT able to deploy a VM for a user in ROOT 
domain in a shared network with ... === TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_account_ROOTuser | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is NOT able to deploy a VM for a admin user in a 
shared network with ... === TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_account_differentdomain | Status 
: SUCCESS ===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is NOT able to deploy a VM for admin user in the 
same domain but in a ... === TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_account_domainadminuser | Status 
: SUCCESS ===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is NOT able to deploy a VM for user in the same 
domain but in a different ... === TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_account_domainuser | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is able to deploy a VM for regular user in a shared 
network with scope=account ... === TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_account_user | Status : SUCCESS 
===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is able to deploy a VM for user in ROOT domain in a 
shared network with scope=all ... === TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_all_ROOTuser | Status : SUCCESS 
===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is able to deploy a VM for a domain admin users in 
a shared network with scope=all ... === TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_all_domainadminuser | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is able to deploy a VM for other users in a shared 
network with scope=all ... === TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_all_domainuser | Status : SUCCESS 
===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is able to deploy a VM for admin user in a domain 
in a shared network with scope=all ... === TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_all_subdomainadminuser | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is able to deploy a VM for any user in a subdomain 
in a shared network with scope=all ... === TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_all_subdomainuser | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is NOT able to deploy a VM for parent domain admin 
user in a shared network with scope=domain with no subdomain access ... === 
TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_domain_nosubdomainaccess_ROOTuser 
| Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is able to deploy a VM for domain admin user in a 
shared network with scope=domain with no subdomain access ... === TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_domain_nosubdomainaccess_domainadminuser
 | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is able to deploy a VM for domain user in a shared 
network with scope=domain with no subdomain access ... === TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_domain_nosubdomainaccess_domainuser
 | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is NOT able to deploy a VM for parent domain admin 
user in a shared network with scope=domain with no subdomain access ... === 
TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_domain_nosubdomainaccess_parentdomainadminuser
 | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is NOT able to deploy a VM for parent domain user 
in a shared network with scope=domain with no subdomain access ... === 
TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_domain_nosubdomainaccess_parentdomainuser
 | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is NOT able to deploy a VM for sub domain admin 
user in a shared network with scope=domain with no subdomain access ... === 
TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_domain_nosubdomainaccess_subdomainadminuser
 | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is NOT able to deploy a VM for sub domain user in a 
shared network with scope=domain with no subdomain access ... === TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_domain_nosubdomainaccess_subdomainuser
 | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is NOT able to deploy a VM for user in ROOT domain 
in a shared network with scope=domain with subdomain access ... === TestName:

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1578: CLOUDSTACK-9401 : Support for Internal DNS in Nuage ...

2016-06-02 Thread singalrahul 
Github user singalrahul commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1578
  
Added Marvin code PEP8 & PyFlakes compliance:
cloudstack$ pep8 --max-line-length=150 test_internal_dns.py
cloudstack$ pyflakes test_internal_dns.py
cloudstack$


Validations:-
Marvin test run:
nosetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=nuage.cfg 
plugins/nuagevsp/test_internal_dns.py

Results:-
[runinfo.txt](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/files/295579/runinfo.txt)

Verify InternalDns on Isolated Network ... === TestName: 
test_01_Isolated_Network_with_zone | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Verify InternalDns on Isolated Network with ping by hostname ... === 
TestName: test_02_Isolated_Network | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Verify update NetworkDomain for InternalDns on Isolated Network ... === 
TestName: test_03_Update_Network_with_Domain | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Verify update NetworkDomain for InternalDns on Isolated Network with ping 
VM ... === TestName: test_04_Update_Network_with_Domain | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Verify InternalDns on VPC Network ... === TestName: 
test_05_VPC_Network_With_InternalDns | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Verify InternalDns on VPC Network by ping with hostname ... === TestName: 
test_06_VPC_Network_With_InternalDns | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
--
[runinfo.txt](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/files/295582/runinfo.txt)

Ran 6 tests in 5736.562s
OK


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1577: CLOUDSTACK-9321 : Multiple Internal LB rules (more t...

2016-06-02 Thread prashanthvarma 
Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1577
  
Added Marvin test code PEP8 & PyFlakes compliance:
CloudStack$
CloudStack$ pep8 --max-line-length=150 
test/integration/component/test_vpc_network_internal_lbrules.py
CloudStack$
CloudStack$ pyflakes 
test/integration/component/test_vpc_network_internal_lbrules.py
CloudStack$
CloudStack$ pep8 --max-line-length=150 test/integration/plugins/nuagevsp/.py
CloudStack$
CloudStack$ pyflakes test/integration/plugins/nuagevsp/.py
CloudStack$

Validations:
1) Made sure that we didn't break any Public LB (VpcVirtualRouter) 
functionality.

Marvin test run:
nosetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=nuage.cfg 
test/integration/component/test_vpc_network_lbrules.py

Test results:
Test case no 210 and 227: List Load Balancing Rules belonging to a VPC ... 
=== TestName: test_01_VPC_LBRulesListing | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Create LB rules for 1 network which is part of a two/multiple virtual 
networks of a ... === TestName: test_02_VPC_CreateLBRuleInMultipleNetworks | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test case no 222 : Create LB rules for a two/multiple virtual networks of a 
... === TestName: test_03_VPC_CreateLBRuleInMultipleNetworksVRStoppedState | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test case no 222 : Create LB rules for a two/multiple virtual networks of a 
... === TestName: test_04_VPC_CreateLBRuleInMultipleNetworksVRStoppedState | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test case no 214 : Delete few(not all) LB rules for a single virtual 
network of a ... === TestName: test_05_VPC_CreateAndDeleteLBRule | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Delete few(not all) LB rules for a single virtual network of ... === 
TestName: test_06_VPC_CreateAndDeleteLBRuleVRStopppedState | Status : SUCCESS 
===
ok
Test Delete all LB rules for a single virtual network of a ... === 
TestName: test_07_VPC_CreateAndDeleteAllLBRule | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Delete all LB rules for a single virtual network of a ... === 
TestName: test_08_VPC_CreateAndDeleteAllLBRuleVRStoppedState | Status : SUCCESS 
===
ok
Test User should not be allowed to create a LB rule for a VM that belongs 
to a different VPC. ... === TestName: test_09_VPC_LBRuleCreateFailMultipleVPC | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test User should not be allowed to create a LB rule for a VM that does not 
belong to any VPC. ... === TestName: 
test_10_VPC_FailedToCreateLBRuleNonVPCNetwork | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test case no 217 and 236: User should not be allowed to create a LB rule 
for a ... === TestName: test_11_VPC_LBRuleCreateNotAllowed | Status : SUCCESS 
===
ok
Test User should not be allowed to create a LB rule on an Ipaddress that 
Source Nat enabled. ... === TestName: test_12_VPC_LBRuleCreateFailForRouterIP | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test User should not be allowed to create a LB rule on an Ipaddress that 
already has a PF rule. ... === TestName: 
test_13_VPC_LBRuleCreateFailForPFSourceNATIP | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test User should not be allowed to create a LB rule on an Ipaddress that 
already has a Static Nat rule. ... === TestName: 
test_14_VPC_LBRuleCreateFailForStaticNatRule | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test release Ip address that has a LB rule assigned to it. ... === 
TestName: test_15_VPC_ReleaseIPForLBRuleCreated | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

Ran 15 tests in 8586.639s

OK

2) Marvin test coverage for Internal LB feature on master with native ACS 
setup (component directory) including validations for this bug fix.

Marvin test run:
nosetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=nuage.cfg 
test/integration/component/test_vpc_network_internal_lbrules.py

Test results:
Test VPC Network Internal LB functionality with different combinations of 
Internal LB rules ... === TestName: test_01_internallb_rules | Status : SUCCESS 
===
ok
Test VPC Network Internal LB functionality by performing (wget) traffic 
tests within a VPC ... === TestName: test_02_internallb_rules_traffic | Status 
: SUCCESS ===
ok
Test VPC Network Internal LB functionality with restarts of VPC network 
components by performing (wget) ... === TestName: 
test_03_internallb_rules_vpc_network_restarts_traffic | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test VPC Network Internal LB functionality with InternalLbVm appliance 
operations by performing (wget) ... === TestName: 
test_04_internallb_appliance_operations_traffic | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

Ran 4 tests in 6729.698s

OK

3) Enhancements on our exiting Internal LB Marvin test code (nuagevsp 
plugins directory) to validate this bug fix.

Marvin test run:
nosetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=nuage.cfg 
test/integration/plugins/nuagevsp/test_nuage_vpc_internal_lb.py

Test results:
Test Nuage VSP VPC

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...

2016-06-02 Thread prashanthvarma 
Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580
  
Our Marvin test code PEP8 & PyFlakes compliance:
CloudStack$
CloudStack$ pep8 --max-line-length=150 test/integration/plugins/nuagevsp/.py
CloudStack$
CloudStack$ pyflakes test/integration/plugins/nuagevsp/.py
CloudStack$

Validations:
1) Underlay infra (PAT & FIP2UL)

Marvin test run:
nosetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=nuage.cfg 
plugins/nuagevsp/test_nuage_source_nat.py

Test results:
Test Nuage VSP Isolated networks with different combinations of Source NAT 
service providers ... === TestName: test_01_nuage_SourceNAT_isolated_networks | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Nuage VSP VPC networks with different combinations of Source NAT 
service providers ... === TestName: test_02_nuage_SourceNAT_vpc_networks | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Nuage VSP Source NAT functionality for Isolated network by performing 
(wget) traffic tests to the ... === TestName: 
test_03_nuage_SourceNAT_isolated_network_traffic | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Nuage VSP Source NAT functionality for VPC network by performing 
(wget) traffic tests to the Internet ... === TestName: 
test_04_nuage_SourceNAT_vpc_network_traffic | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Nuage VSP Source NAT functionality with different Egress 
Firewall/Network ACL rules by performing (wget) ... === TestName: 
test_05_nuage_SourceNAT_acl_rules_traffic | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Nuage VSP Source NAT functionality with VM NIC operations by 
performing (wget) traffic tests to the ... === TestName: 
test_06_nuage_SourceNAT_vm_nic_operations_traffic | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Nuage VSP Source NAT functionality with VM migration by performing 
(wget) traffic tests to the Internet ... === TestName: 
test_07_nuage_SourceNAT_vm_migration_traffic | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Nuage VSP Source NAT functionality with network restarts by performing 
(wget) traffic tests to the ... === TestName: 
test_08_nuage_SourceNAT_network_restarts_traffic | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 8 tests in 13360.858s

OK

Marvin test run:
nosetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=nuage.cfg 
plugins/nuagevsp/test_nuage_static_nat.py

Test results:
Test Nuage VSP Public IP Range creation and deletion ... === TestName: 
test_01_nuage_StaticNAT_public_ip_range | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Nuage VSP Nuage Underlay (underlay networking) enabled Public IP Range 
creation and deletion ... === TestName: 
test_02_nuage_StaticNAT_underlay_public_ip_range | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Nuage VSP Isolated networks with different combinations of Static NAT 
service providers ... === TestName: test_03_nuage_StaticNAT_isolated_networks | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Nuage VSP VPC networks with different combinations of Static NAT 
service providers ... === TestName: test_04_nuage_StaticNAT_vpc_networks | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Nuage VSP Static NAT functionality for Isolated network by performing 
(wget) traffic tests to the ... === TestName: 
test_05_nuage_StaticNAT_isolated_networks_traffic | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Nuage VSP Static NAT functionality for VPC network by performing 
(wget) traffic tests to the Internet ... === TestName: 
test_06_nuage_StaticNAT_vpc_network_traffic | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Nuage VSP Static NAT functionality with different Egress 
Firewall/Network ACL rules by performing (wget) ... === TestName: 
test_07_nuage_StaticNAT_acl_rules_traffic | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Nuage VSP Static NAT functionality with VM NIC operations by 
performing (wget) traffic tests to the ... === TestName: 
test_08_nuage_StaticNAT_vm_nic_operations_traffic | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Nuage VSP Static NAT functionality with VM migration by performing 
(wget) traffic tests to the Internet ... === TestName: 
test_09_nuage_StaticNAT_vm_migration_traffic | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Nuage VSP Static NAT functionality with network restarts by performing 
(wget) traffic tests to the ... === TestName: 
test_10_nuage_StaticNAT_network_restarts_traffic | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 10 tests in 9472.468s

OK

2) Overlay Infra (Source & Static NAT)

Marvin test run:
nosetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=nuage.cfg 
plugins/nuagevsp/test_nuage_source_nat.py

Test results:
Test Nuage VSP Isolated networks with different combinations of Source NAT 
service providers ... === TestName: test_01_nuage_SourceNAT_isolated_networks | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Nuage VSP VPC networks with different combinations of Source NAT 
service providers ... ===

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1183: Marvin test to verify that adding TCP ports 500,4500...

2016-06-02 Thread bvbharatk 
Github user bvbharatk commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1183
  
### ACS CI BVT Run
 **Sumarry:**
 Build Number 112
 Hypervisor xenserver
 NetworkType Advanced
 Passed=68
 Failed=5
 Skipped=3

_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ 
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0


**Failed tests:**
* test_vpc_vpn.py

 * ContextSuite context=TestRVPCSite2SiteVpn>:setup Failing since 9 runs

 * ContextSuite context=TestVpcRemoteAccessVpn>:setup Failing since 9 runs

 * ContextSuite context=TestVpcSite2SiteVpn>:setup Failing since 9 runs

* test_volumes.py

 * test_06_download_detached_volume Failed

* test_vm_life_cycle.py

 * test_10_attachAndDetach_iso Failed


**Skipped tests:**
test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3
test_static_role_account_acls
test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm

**Passed test suits:**
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py
test_affinity_groups_projects.py
test_portable_publicip.py
test_over_provisioning.py
test_global_settings.py
test_scale_vm.py
test_service_offerings.py
test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py
test_routers.py
test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py
test_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py
test_login.py
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_public_ip_range.py
test_multipleips_per_nic.py
test_regions.py
test_affinity_groups.py
test_network_acl.py
test_pvlan.py
test_nic.py
test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py
test_resource_detail.py
test_secondary_storage.py
test_disk_offerings.py


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay featur...

2016-06-02 Thread nlivens 
GitHub user nlivens opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580

CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (PAT & FIP2UL) in Nuage VSP 
plugin



You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/nlivens/cloudstack nuage_vsp_pat_fip2ul

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1580


commit c86ab936f03b9815debaa535065df10dc724149f
Author: Eric Waegeman 
Date:   2016-05-26T09:37:52Z

CLOUDSTACK-9401 : Support for Internal DNS in Nuage VSP plugin

commit 064646de7604ffb58a4ae7ecc3db103e4e067fbf
Author: rahul singal 
Date:   2016-06-02T09:30:25Z

CLOUDSTACK-9401 : Marvin tests for Internal DNS verification with NuageVsp

commit 60a3b4e27bc6384697025f7263428804c43f9b64
Author: Nick Livens 
Date:   2016-04-28T13:52:17Z

CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (PAT & FIP2UL) in Nuage VSP 
plugin

commit ef522a07ecd2f0c98d90ba054d4e7d69e95c1f67
Author: Prashanth Manthena 
Date:   2016-05-26T10:48:02Z

CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Marvin tests for Source NAT and Static NAT including 
PAT/FIP2UL features with NuageVsp




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1579: CLOUDSTACK-9403 : Support for shared networks...

2016-06-02 Thread nlivens 
GitHub user nlivens opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1579

CLOUDSTACK-9403 : Support for shared networks in Nuage VSP plugin

Test Results are:-
Valiate that ROOT admin is NOT able to deploy a VM for a user in ROOT 
domain in a shared network with ... === TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_account_ROOTuser | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is NOT able to deploy a VM for a admin user in a 
shared network with ... === TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_account_differentdomain | Status 
: SUCCESS ===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is NOT able to deploy a VM for admin user in the 
same domain but in a ... === TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_account_domainadminuser | Status 
: SUCCESS ===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is NOT able to deploy a VM for user in the same 
domain but in a different ... === TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_account_domainuser | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is able to deploy a VM for regular user in a shared 
network with scope=account ... === TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_account_user | Status : SUCCESS 
===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is able to deploy a VM for user in ROOT domain in a 
shared network with scope=all ... === TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_all_ROOTuser | Status : SUCCESS 
===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is able to deploy a VM for a domain admin users in 
a shared network with scope=all ... === TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_all_domainadminuser | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is able to deploy a VM for other users in a shared 
network with scope=all ... === TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_all_domainuser | Status : SUCCESS 
===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is able to deploy a VM for admin user in a domain 
in a shared network with scope=all ... === TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_all_subdomainadminuser | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is able to deploy a VM for any user in a subdomain 
in a shared network with scope=all ... === TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_all_subdomainuser | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is NOT able to deploy a VM for parent domain admin 
user in a shared network with scope=domain with no subdomain access ... === 
TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_domain_nosubdomainaccess_ROOTuser 
| Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is able to deploy a VM for domain admin user in a 
shared network with scope=domain with no subdomain access ... === TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_domain_nosubdomainaccess_domainadminuser
 | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is able to deploy a VM for domain user in a shared 
network with scope=domain with no subdomain access ... === TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_domain_nosubdomainaccess_domainuser
 | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is NOT able to deploy a VM for parent domain admin 
user in a shared network with scope=domain with no subdomain access ... === 
TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_domain_nosubdomainaccess_parentdomainadminuser
 | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is NOT able to deploy a VM for parent domain user 
in a shared network with scope=domain with no subdomain access ... === 
TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_domain_nosubdomainaccess_parentdomainuser
 | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is NOT able to deploy a VM for sub domain admin 
user in a shared network with scope=domain with no subdomain access ... === 
TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_domain_nosubdomainaccess_subdomainadminuser
 | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is NOT able to deploy a VM for sub domain user in a 
shared network with scope=domain with no subdomain access ... === TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_domain_nosubdomainaccess_subdomainuser
 | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is NOT able to deploy a VM for user in ROOT domain 
in a shared network with scope=domain with subdomain access ... === TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_domain_withsubdomainaccess_ROOTuser
 | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is able to deploy a VM for domain admin user in a 
shared network with scope=domain with subdomain access ... === TestName: 
test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_admin_scope_domain_withsubdomainaccess_domainadminuser
 | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Valiate that ROOT admin is able to deploy a VM for domain user in a shared 
network with

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1578: CLOUDSTACK-9401 : Support for Internal DNS in...

2016-06-02 Thread nlivens 
GitHub user nlivens opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1578

CLOUDSTACK-9401 : Support for Internal DNS in Nuage VSP plugin

Testrun:-
Verify InternalDns on Isolated Network ... === TestName: 
test_01_Isolated_Network_with_zone | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Verify InternalDns on Isolated Network with ping by hostname ... === 
TestName: test_02_Isolated_Network | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Verify update NetworkDomain for InternalDns on Isolated Network ... === 
TestName: test_03_Update_Network_with_Domain | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Verify update NetworkDomain for InternalDns on Isolated Network with ping 
VM ... === TestName: test_04_Update_Network_with_Domain | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Verify InternalDns on VPC Network ... === TestName: 
test_05_VPC_Network_With_InternalDns | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Verify InternalDns on VPC Network by ping with hostname ... === TestName: 
test_06_VPC_Network_With_InternalDns | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
--
Ran 6 tests in 5736.562s
OK
cloudstack$ pep8 --max-line-length=150 test_internal_dns.py
cloudstack$ pyflakes test_internal_dns.py
cloudstack$

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/nlivens/cloudstack nuage_vsp_internal_dns

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1578.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1578


commit c86ab936f03b9815debaa535065df10dc724149f
Author: Eric Waegeman 
Date:   2016-05-26T09:37:52Z

CLOUDSTACK-9401 : Support for Internal DNS in Nuage VSP plugin

commit 064646de7604ffb58a4ae7ecc3db103e4e067fbf
Author: rahul singal 
Date:   2016-06-02T09:30:25Z

CLOUDSTACK-9401 : Marvin tests for Internal DNS verification with NuageVsp




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1577: CLOUDSTACK-9321 : Multiple Internal LB rules ...

2016-06-02 Thread nlivens 
GitHub user nlivens opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1577

CLOUDSTACK-9321 : Multiple Internal LB rules (more than one Internal LB 
rule with same source IP address) are not getting resolved in the corresponding 
InternalLbVm instance's haproxy.cfg file



You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/nlivens/cloudstack CLOUDSTACK-9321

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1577.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1577


commit e44b988372b58fd75c35791121f5baf02add5eb3
Author: Nick Livens 
Date:   2016-04-13T15:08:50Z

CLOUDSTACK-9321 : Multiple Internal LB rules (more than one Internal LB 
rule with same source IP address) are not getting resolved in the corresponding 
InternalLbVm instance's haproxy.cfg file

commit 39b932b6b1117687957dc41cd56c8e83b5a97541
Author: Prashanth Manthena 
Date:   2016-04-25T15:13:10Z

Adding component tests for VPC Network functionality - Internal LB rules




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: IPv6 Hackathon next week

2016-06-02 Thread Wido den Hollander 
We have set the hackathon meeting for tomorrow.

Friday June 3rd 11:00 EDT, that's 15:00 UTC.

Hangouts URL: https://hangouts.google.com/call/wvba4paauzg53l6vjylbodkiyie

Let's get IPv6 into CloudStack!

Wido

> Op 1 juni 2016 om 7:57 schreef Abhinandan Prateek 
> :
> 
> 
> On IPv6 support:
> 
> Cloudstack has limited IPv6 support already built into it IPv6 Support in 
> CloudStack 
> . This does 
> not appear to be in use ? And also looks like a superficial add on as against 
> a well thought of feature.
> 
> IPv6 support is much required and there are efforts to add IPv6 support to 
> cloudstack with different approaches. There is an effort to add IPv6 support 
> to basic networking here IPv6 in Basic Networking 
> 
>  and another one that is trying to add IPv6 support to VPC's networks here 
> IPv6 in VPC Router 
> . 
> 
> It is possible that the localised efforts may lead to code duplication and 
> other inefficiencies and inelegancies. It is important that we write a common 
> set of  network primitives that are IPv6 and IPv4 aware and that can be used 
> further to enable IPv6 in various other components and resources managed by 
> cloudstack.A start to this effect has been made in this OSPF PR: IPv6 in VPC 
> Router 
> .
>  
> 
> As part of this collab, can we get an overall IPv6 strategy in place so that 
> the localised efforts have some thing to look upto ? This will mean A] Are 
> the external cloudstack dependecies dual stack ? B] Where all dual scheme 
> will be required and where it will be on choice, like Can I have a system vm 
> services available on both IPV6 and IPV4 or while configuring the zone we 
> just mark it as a IPV6 zone, for example. There will be more such questions.  
> Ready answers to such questions will help in moulding the various IPv6 works 
> that are going on.
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> -abhi
> 
> 
> On 31/05/16, 1:45 AM, "williamstev...@gmail.com on behalf of Will Stevens" 
>  wrote:
> 
> >I added some more details to the page to make it clearer when the meetings
> >are taking place and where to find the mentioned slack channel.
> >
> >*Will STEVENS*
> >Lead Developer
> >
> >*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
> >420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
> >w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
> >
> >On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion 
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Wido,  all,
> >>
> >> I've create a wiki page for the collab, so anyone willing to attend
> >> remotely at the round-table on Wedneday 13h30 EST can use the gotomeeting.
> >> There is also a GoToMeeting scheduled for Friday for the hackathon, I've
> >> put all the detailed on the wiki page:
> >>
> >>
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+Collaboration+Conference%3A+Montreal+2016
> >>
> >> would it make sense to put hackathon topic in that wiki page?
> >>
> >> feel free to update, change comment that page :-)
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >>
> >> PL
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > That's cool,
> >> > we will check how we could conference you in!
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Wido den Hollander 
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> Next week I can't visit the conference in Montreal, but online I'd like
> >> >> to dedicate June 2nd and 3rd to work on IPv6:
> >> >>
> >> >> -
> >> >>
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/IPv6+in+Basic+Networking
> >> >> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-674
> >> >>
> >> >> John Burwell from ShapeBlue will join, who else?
> >> >>
> >> >> The stuff is all in my head and at PCextreme we already have some stuff
> >> >> running with IPv6 with our own hacky stuff.
> >> >>
> >> >> A Google Hangouts will probably work best to talk and discuss stuff.
> >> >>
> >> >> See:
> >> >>
> >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/14U0E1YpgZvsBc88SHVojo-XzOLAKs-WFEkMxXlrAl_o
> >> >>
> >> >> Wido
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> 
> abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com 
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
> 
>

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1304: [CLOUDSTACK-9207] Test to verify restarting vpc netw...

2016-06-02 Thread bvbharatk 
Github user bvbharatk commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1304
  
### ACS CI BVT Run
 **Sumarry:**
 Build Number 111
 Hypervisor xenserver
 NetworkType Advanced
 Passed=73
 Failed=0
 Skipped=3

_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ 
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0


**Failed tests:**

**Skipped tests:**
test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3
test_static_role_account_acls
test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm

**Passed test suits:**
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py
test_affinity_groups_projects.py
test_portable_publicip.py
test_vpc_vpn.py
test_over_provisioning.py
test_global_settings.py
test_scale_vm.py
test_service_offerings.py
test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py
test_routers.py
test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py
test_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py
test_login.py
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_public_ip_range.py
test_multipleips_per_nic.py
test_regions.py
test_affinity_groups.py
test_network_acl.py
test_pvlan.py
test_volumes.py
test_nic.py
test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py
test_resource_detail.py
test_secondary_storage.py
test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_disk_offerings.py


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #866: CLOUDSTACK-8751 minimise downtime of network when net...

2016-06-02 Thread remibergsma 
Github user remibergsma commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/866
  
@ustcweizhou Would be great to see a PR for that 👍 thanks!


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---