Re: 4.9+ release

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 8:20 AM, John Burwell wrote: > Rajani, > > By the rules of semantic versioning (which we follow), incrementing the > major version should only occur if there there is a change that breaks > backwards compatibility of the API, removes support

Re: Release-Management Question about New API Plug-in

That is assuming the RM is willing to do that and forward merge it up to the latest master. Technically for 4.9, we supported merging into 4.7 and 4.8 and master. Once 4.9 is release, the officially supported branches will be 4.8, 4.9 and master. Rajani is correct that ideally new features will

Re: Release-Management Question about New API Plug-in

Sounds good, John I think it will be easier if I just release it directly to the customer. I can always port it to the latest CloudStack version later, if I'd like to. > On Jun 16, 2016, at 8:46 PM, John Burwell wrote: > > Mike, > > Anyone can submit a PR against

Re: 4.9+ release

Marco, As I said in the 5.0.0 thread, I believe that we need to look upon architectural improvement as a continuous process. We have been stymied for years around an analysis paralysis that holds that we must address architectural issue in 5.0.0. I believe that we need to start with remove a

Re: 4.9+ release

Rajani, By the rules of semantic versioning (which we follow), incrementing the major version should only occur if there there is a change that breaks backwards compatibility of the API, removes support for a integrated component, or otherwise reduces/removes existing functionality. Assuming

Re: Release-Management Question about New API Plug-in

Mike, Anyone can submit a PR against any branch. If they can get 2 LGTMs for it, it will be merged. After that, you could create a new 4.6 RC, and open a vote for it. While there is nothing procedurally that prevents someone from following this process, it is unlikely that the release vote

Re: [DISCUSS] 5.0.0 and 6.0.0

Wido, Please see my responses in-line below. Thanks, -John > john.burw...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London VA WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue On Jun 15, 2016, at 3:54 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > You really like typing long e-mails! :)

ApiXmlDocReader.java - Used by anyone???

Hey All, Does anyone know if this class [1] is being used anywhere (other than by Pierre-Luc to create the release notes [2]). The reason I ask is because I know Pierre-Luc spends a lot of time every release manually changing the formatting from what is [3] output to RST format so it can be

ASF Infrastructure Migration Thoughts

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/ASF+Infrastructure+Migration+Thoughts This seems to be mostly conjecture rather than history. It is old and does not seem to have an current use. Can it be deleted? Ron -- Ron Wheeler President Artifact Software Inc email:

CloudStack Mascot Proposals

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+Mascot+Proposals Can this page be deleted? Ron -- Ron Wheeler President Artifact Software Inc email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com skype: ronaldmwheeler phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102

Dead wiki page

Can this page be deleted. It is old and the links are dead. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Developer+Summit Ron -- Ron Wheeler President Artifact Software Inc email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com skype: ronaldmwheeler phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102

Re: Failing to enable SSL/HTTPS on console proxy vm

I have this working perfectly. Couple of key things that are not mentioned in the documentation: - You need to set consoleproxy.url.domain to *.domain.com for whatever domain you're using. Do this before re-uploading your SSL certificate. The SSL upload dialogue doesn't set this value as it

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1594: CLOUDSTACK-9407: vm_network_map table doesnt ...

GitHub user nvazquez opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1594 CLOUDSTACK-9407: vm_network_map table doesnt get cleaned up properly JIRA TICKET: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9407 ### Introduction It was found out that in

Re: Failing to enable SSL/HTTPS on console proxy vm

Dammit, I was missing the consoleproxy.url.domain! What an idiot ... Works just fine now. Will, it can be done, don't give up! :) Thanks Andy! Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Andy Dills" > To:

Re: Failing to enable SSL/HTTPS on console proxy vm

I have a working 4.4.1 setup with some workarounds[1], but I'm failing with 4.8. [1] http://www.nux.ro/archive/2014/03/Run_your_own_realhostip.html -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Will Stevens"

Re: Failing to enable SSL/HTTPS on console proxy vm

We have been having issues with this for as long as I can remember (on both ACS and CCP). In order to get it to work you have to 'trust unsafe scripts' or whatever by clicking the shield in the URL bar in the top right (maybe that is chrome). I don't know that there is a solution, but if there

Failing to enable SSL/HTTPS on console proxy vm

Hi, Is there any particular voodoo involved in getting the $subject to work correctly on 4.8.0? I've uploaded the Comodo wildcard cabundle, crt and key in the Infrastructure page, the systemvms have rebooted. They came back fine and nothing dodgy in the logs, but when I open the console of a

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1542: CLOUDSTACK-9379: Support nested virtualization at VM...

Github user nvazquez commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1542 Could this be reviewed for VMware please? Then I can work on extending it to other HVs Thanks! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

Documentation update

I need the slides from the documentation discussion at the Montreal conference. Ron -- Ron Wheeler President Artifact Software Inc email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com skype: ronaldmwheeler phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1589: Fixing erraneous guest_os_hypervisor mappings

Github user ProjectMoon commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1589#discussion_r67349778 --- Diff: setup/db/db/schema-481to490.sql --- @@ -545,3 +545,14 @@ INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type, hypervis

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1593: CLOUDSTACK-9417: Usage module refactoring

Github user wido commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1593 Packaging changes seem good to me. Java changes as well. Based on the code this is LGTM to me --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1589: Fixing erraneous guest_os_hypervisor mappings

Github user wido commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1589 Thanks! Seem good to me. LGTM --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

Re: Release-Management Question about New API Plug-in

OK - I can always deliver the plug-in for 4.6 directly to my customers and first check it into the CloudStack repo maybe in 4.10 or later. > On Jun 16, 2016, at 12:21 AM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > > "We will only fix bugs in this release branch, no back porting of new >

Re: Release-Management Question about New API Plug-in

"We will only fix bugs in this release branch, no back porting of new features" - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+principles+for+Apache+CloudStack+4.6+and+up I would prefer a PR on master for 4.9+ ~Rajani On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Tutkowski, Mike