[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1598: [CLOUDSTACK-9423] Add ability to get virtual size of...

Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1598 Thank you. I have CI running and I should have results later tonight. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1598: [CLOUDSTACK-9423] Add ability to get virtual size of...

Github user syed commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1598 Yes @swill I've tested this on my local setup. On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > @syed my

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1549: CLOUDSTACK-9348: NioConnection improvements

Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1549 I think I am going to revert this PR. We are having intermittent issues with it still and I am not confident running a production environment with this in place at this time, so I don't think I

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1598: [CLOUDSTACK-9423] Add ability to get virtual size of...

Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1598 @syed my understanding is that you have tested this fix with swift in our lab. That is correct? I will get CI run against it to make sure this does not break anything outside swift.

Re: 4.9/master Testing Coordination

I am testing the following configuration: CentOS 6.7 Mgmt Server + XenServer 6.5 + SolidFire (using Managed pluign) + Swift (Secondary Storage). I've hit the following issue when uploading templates: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1598/ Would someone be able to review this please?

Re: Question regarding the Agent & reconnect()

Marco, I believe it is the Agent that connects back to the server. I haven't seen the agent code but I am curious also. -Syed On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 8:44 AM, ma...@exoscale.ch wrote: > Hi, > > I'm reading the code of the Agent and I'm wondering why we don't allowit > to

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1598: [CLOUDSTACK-9423] Add ability to get virtual ...

GitHub user syed opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1598 [CLOUDSTACK-9423] Add ability to get virtual size of compressed VHDs With object store like Swift as secondary storage, if a compressed VHD is uploaded as a template, the `VHDProcessor`

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1596: CLOUDSTACK-9353: [XenServer] Fixed VM migration with...

Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1596 @remibergsma Yes, we can close old one. @swill This PR is created against 4.7 so it can be forward merged to all branches. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1596: CLOUDSTACK-9353: [XenServer] Fixed VM migration with...

Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1596 This should probably get int0 4.9 right? If this is broken we should try to get the fix in as early as possible right? There are other potential issues pending, so we have not pushed forward on

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1596: CLOUDSTACK-9353: [XenServer] Fixed VM migration with...

Github user remibergsma commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1596 @anshul1886 Ok, thanks. I think we should close that old one, shouldn't we? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well.

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1596: CLOUDSTACK-9353: [XenServer] Fixed VM migration with...

Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1596 @remibergsma #925 is no more valid after fix of #1336. This PR handles the broken case i.e. migration with storage with cluster is currently broken. --- If your project is set up for it,

Re: Xenserver 6.5 live migration with local volumes

Hi Remi, For me it’s (migration across clusters with storage) working fine but am on internal branch. There could be some regressions due to recent refactors. As far as this patch goes this handles with cluster case. PR https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/925 is no more valid after

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1596: CLOUDSTACK-9353: [XenServer] Fixed VM migration with...

Github user remibergsma commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1596 Same approach as proposed in #925, although both address different problems. I'd say let's test this stuff and get it in to resolve these issues. We may want to look to the other PR as