Re: Ceph RBD related host agent segfault

2016-07-06 Thread Aaron Hurt
> On Jul 6, 2016, at 5:14 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > >> >> Op 6 juli 2016 om 16:18 schreef Aaron Hurt > >: >> >> >> >>> On Jul 2, 2016, at 11:37 AM, Wido den Hollander >> > wrote: >>>

Re: Ceph RBD related host agent segfault

2016-07-06 Thread Wido den Hollander
> Op 6 juli 2016 om 16:18 schreef Aaron Hurt : > > > > > On Jul 2, 2016, at 11:37 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > > >> > >> Op 30 juni 2016 om 18:29 schreef Aaron Hurt >> >: > >> > >> > >> In preparation to roll a

[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

2016-07-06 Thread Will Stevens
Hi All, I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546 Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb I will be updating the Release

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1591: Updating Alert codes

2016-07-06 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1591 We'll need to check this against the consumers of the response, based on present alert codes we may need to update it. We'll also need to see when the alert code diverged, why some of the alert

Re: [PROPOSAL] 2016-2017 Release Cycle and Calendar

2016-07-06 Thread Rohit Yadav
Wido, sorry if that confused you. I meant to say what John has explained. If we can at least get the RC voting started/concluded by 15 July, I think we can cut a 4.9 based LTS. Regards. rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1605: CLOUDSTACK-9428: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-9211 - Improve p...

2016-07-06 Thread nvazquez
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1605 Thanks @rhtyd @sateesh-chodapuneedi for your reviews! I pushed new chages based on @sateesh-chodapuneedi comments, now Jenkins passed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to

Re: Ceph RBD related host agent segfault

2016-07-06 Thread Aaron Hurt
> On Jul 2, 2016, at 11:37 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > >> >> Op 30 juni 2016 om 18:29 schreef Aaron Hurt > >: >> >> >> In preparation to roll a new platform built on 4.8 with a Ceph storage >> backend we’ve been encountering

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1605: CLOUDSTACK-9428: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-9211 - Im...

2016-07-06 Thread nvazquez
Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1605#discussion_r69735374 --- Diff: plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResource.java --- @@ -2015,19 +2016,20 @@ protected StartAnswer

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1605: CLOUDSTACK-9428: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-9211 - Im...

2016-07-06 Thread nvazquez
Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1605#discussion_r69735338 --- Diff: plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResource.java --- @@ -2015,19 +2016,20 @@ protected StartAnswer

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1604: improvement: systemvm slow operations

2016-07-06 Thread syed
Github user syed commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1604 we do have to remember that arping is ipv4 only so we need to fix this for ipv6 too --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well.

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1604: improvement: systemvm slow operations

2016-07-06 Thread syed
Github user syed commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1604 Thanks @romain-dartigues based on your comments the code LGTM --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1602: CLOUDSTACK-9422: Granular 'vmware.create.full.clone'...

2016-07-06 Thread syed
Github user syed commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1602 Thanks guys. The code LGTM based on the code review. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have

Re: Opportunity to contribute in Apache CloudStack

2016-07-06 Thread Tim Mackey
Jainesh, and by extension all members of TheAtom, welcome to the CloudStack project. You'll want to join the development list (dev@cloudstack.apache.org), and look at the contributing section here: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack and here: https://cloudstack.apache.org/developers.html. A

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1591: Updating Alert codes

2016-07-06 Thread wido
Github user wido commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1591 Can maybe @rhtyd comment on this one? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1595: ui: show resize volume button to all users

2016-07-06 Thread wido
Github user wido commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1595 LGTM --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1599: Independent marvin

2016-07-06 Thread wido
Github user wido commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1599 Understood. LGTM --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so,

Re: [PROPOSAL] 2016-2017 Release Cycle and Calendar

2016-07-06 Thread Wido den Hollander
> Op 5 juli 2016 om 21:16 schreef John Burwell : > > > Wido, > > I don’t think that Rohit is advocating expanding the 4.9.0 scope. Instead, > he is saying that proceeding with LTS on 4.8.0.1 would be counterproductive. > 4.8.0 was released in January meaning