Upgrade from 4.8.0.1 to 4.9 issue

I upgraded a very clean environment of 4.8.0.1 to 4.9 and I am receiving this error when trying to enable the dynamic.apichecker.enabled setting: 2016-08-17 00:20:03,148 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-25:ctx-01fb5369) (logid:3a6b506e) ===START=== 192.168.250.250 -- GET

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1593: CLOUDSTACK-9417: Usage module refactoring

Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1593 @serg38 we require Marvin test results and, as well as, the results of any manual tests to be posted into the PR. This information is a pre-requisite for merging PRs. Please see other closed

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1638: CLOUDSTACK-9456: Use Spring 4 and Java 8

Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1638 @rhtyd there is a difference between supporting Java8 and using it as the default version. By changing the POMs, Maven will require that Java8 in order to use CloudStack dependencies.

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1593: CLOUDSTACK-9417: Usage module refactoring

Github user serg38 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1593 @jburwell LGTM for the test part. This PR was extensively tested on Environment: RHEL 6 management servers, Vmware ESX5.5 and 6.0 with advanced networking --- If your project is set up for

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: System VMs on Managed Storage

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 Here is a screen capture on the changes to the System Service Offering dialog. [](url)

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1642: System VMs on Managed Storage

GitHub user mike-tutkowski opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 System VMs on Managed Storage This PR makes it easier to spin up system VMs on managed storage. Managed storage is when you have a dedicated volume on a SAN for a particular

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1638: CLOUDSTACK-9456: Use Spring 4 and Java 8

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1638 @jburwell Running tests against JRE 1.7, 1.8 is do-able. But I really want our master to use JDK 1.8. If we want to be able to run ACS mgmt server, agents etc against JRE 1.8 on both 4.9/lts and

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1638: CLOUDSTACK-9456: Use Spring 4 and Java 8

Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1638 @rhtyd @pdion891 I apologize for my delayed reply as I am on vacation ATM. We had previously agreed not to require Java8 until 5.0.0 which is scheduled for the end of 2016. 4.x should be

[DISCUSS] Using Github's squash merge to close pull request?

All, I found that Github also allows to merge a PR with the changes squashed [1], our git-pr script uses a normal branch-merge pattern. Should we evaluate using the approach of squash-merging a PR [1] to reduce git-history clutter? Github also (finally) allows to edit a PR and change base

Re: CCC Brasil

C ​an you please let us know dates for rescheduled event as soon as possible? Thanks​ 2016-08-16 12:32 GMT-03:00 Marco Sinhoreli : > All, > > > > I am very sorry to have to say that we have had to postpone the upcoming > CCC conference in Sao Paluo. > > > > Over

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1638: CLOUDSTACK-9456: Use Spring 4 and Java 8

Github user pdion891 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1638 Make sense, thanks, I hope it will get thru then to add support for Ubuntu 16.04 for the management server host and KVM. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1593: CLOUDSTACK-9417: Usage module refactoring

Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1593 @serg38 I only see code review LGTMs. We need at least one test LGTM before this PR. In this case, those tests must be run against real hardware and hypervisors. Also, we need an LGTM from

Re: Request for comments: Moving to Spring 4 and Java 8

All, We now have a PR where we're able to build, run and test CloudStack master with JDK 1.8 and Spring 4.3. Special thanks to Marc-Aurèle Brothier for fixing the unit test issues. The only outstanding issue is getting the F5 plugin to build, which I could not figure out how to fix even

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack issue #1542: CLOUDSTACK-9379: Support nested virtualization at VM...

@rhtyd The rationale to have vmware.nested.virtualization.perVM was that advanced vm_details and template details are user controlled. With https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9457 ‘Allow retrieval and modification of VM and template details via API and UI’ users will be able to

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1638: CLOUDSTACK-9456: Use Spring 4 and Java 8

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1638 @pdion891 we're neither breaking any backward compatibility wrt APIs, or schema, nor we've made any core change (mgmt server core, cmd-answer patterns, rpcs/serialization, or the plugin-system).

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1542: CLOUDSTACK-9379: Support nested virtualization at VM...

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1542 @nvazquez @serg38 how about we remove vmware.nested.virtualization.perVM and instead if the user vm detail exists and is true, it overrides the global setting? --- If your project is set up for

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1542: CLOUDSTACK-9379: Support nested virtualization at VM...

Github user serg38 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1542 @jburwell @rhtyd @koushik-das Can you review this PR? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1560: CLOUDSTACK-9386: DS template copies don’t get dele...

Github user serg38 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1560 @rafaelweingartner @jburwell @rhtyd @koushik-das Can you review this PR? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1593: CLOUDSTACK-9417: Usage module refactoring

Github user serg38 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1593 @karuturi @jburwell There are 2 LGTM in this PR. Packaging, Travis and Jenkins all passed. Can this be merged? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1602: CLOUDSTACK-9422: Granular 'vmware.create.full.clone'...

Github user serg38 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1602 @jburwell Are there any outstanding issues with this PR? It is waiting for second LGTM. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1605: CLOUDSTACK-9428: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-9211 - Improve p...

Github user serg38 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1605 @rafaelweingartner @swill Will you be able to review this one? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1615: CLOUDSTACK-9438: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-9252 - Make NFS ...

Github user serg38 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615 @jburwell Are there any outstanding issues with this PR? It is waiting for second LGTM. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1593: CLOUDSTACK-9417: Usage module refactoring

Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1593#discussion_r74966728 --- Diff: usage/src/com/cloud/usage/UsageSanityChecker.java --- @@ -72,7 +72,9 @@ protected boolean checkItemCountByPstmt(CheckCase checkCase) throws

CCC Brasil

All, I am very sorry to have to say that we have had to postpone the upcoming CCC conference in Sao Paluo. Over the past few months we have been working very hard with an events organiser to try and get the conference off the ground. Conferences are very expensive to stage here in Brasil so

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1593: CLOUDSTACK-9417: Usage module refactoring

Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1593#discussion_r74957023 --- Diff: usage/src/com/cloud/usage/UsageSanityChecker.java --- @@ -72,7 +72,9 @@ protected boolean checkItemCountByPstmt(CheckCase checkCase)

Re: [PROPOSAL] Early LTS Initial Release

To me, if we would like to offer LTS, we need to fix following core issues: - how database version is handle, right now database structure is mixed with upgrade*.sql files and some java code - better test upgrade path, I'm not sure we test them properly :-S I have to admit I'm not fan of LTS

cloudstack-usage no longer working / error saving account to cloud_usage db

Hi! We've recently noticed cloudstack-usage is no longer able to write usage data into mysql. I assume this happened after updateing to 4.8.0.1 or 4.9 - we missed that error in our testsetup... Here's the usage.log: http://pastebin.com/Zpvnw4xX Finally it fails with following message: ERROR

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1638: CLOUDSTACK-9456: Use Spring 4 and Java 8

Github user pdion891 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1638 Shouldn't we consider doing a 5.0.0 release that would support Java 8 or we want to go Java8 at 4.10.0 ? Otherwise I can't review, but I should be able to help on testing. --- If

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1641: CLOUDSTACK-9459: the try's catch block was shortenin...

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1641 LGTM, the only change is to move the catch block to the end so the ResultSet is not closed once the code comes out of the try-catch block. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1641: CLOUDSTACK-9459: the try's catch blick was sh...

GitHub user abhinandanprateek opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1641 CLOUDSTACK-9459: the try's catch blick was shortening the preparedstatement life the try's catch blick was shortening the preparedstatement's life resulting in bad resultset when

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1628: updated contributing.md

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1628 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

Re: CLOUDSTACK-7982 - KVM live migration

You are now on the Jira contributors list. You should be able to assign issues. Thanks, ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On August 12, 2016 at 5:57 PM, ma...@exoscale.ch (ma...@exoscale.ch) wrote: Need some Jira love... Can someone give me the rights to assign myself to this JIRA

Re: Working/Supported versions for VMware vCenter and ESXi Hosts/Cluster for CloudStack 4.9

Hi Jonas, We've not yet updated the docs as we've not performed tests on/with vCenter/ESXi 6 exhaustively. In practice, it does seem to work. We've an automated Trillian [1] based environment where we're able to deploy an advanced (CloudStack 4.9) zone with vCenter/ESXi 6 and get basic vm

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1638: CLOUDSTACK-9456: Use Spring 4 and Java 8

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1638 Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian repo: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/pr/1638 Job ID-86 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1640: CLOUDSTACK-9458: Fix HA bug when VMs are stop...

GitHub user marcaurele opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1640 CLOUDSTACK-9458: Fix HA bug when VMs are stopped on agent disconnect VM are being restarted even if they don't have HA enabled. If the agent gets back online before the command expires

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1638: CLOUDSTACK-9456: Use Spring 4 and Java 8

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1638 @rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1638: CLOUDSTACK-9456: Use Spring 4 and Java 8

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1638 Thanks @marcaurele for your fix, it has been included in the PR. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1638: CLOUDSTACK-9456: Use Spring 4 and Java 8

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1638 @blueorangutan package --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and