>From a quick look at the code you've forgotten one "|" for the or condition:
$.validator.addMethod("ipv46cidr", function(value, element) {
if (!$.validator.methods.ipv4cidr.call(this, value, element) ||
!$.validator.methods.ipv6cidr.call(this, value, element))
return false;
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
reran the test for delete account and it passes.
`Test for delete account ... === TestName: test_delete_account | Status :
SUCCESS ===
ok`
merging this PR now
---
If your project
GitHub user SudharmaJain opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1737
CLOUDSTACK-9561 Unable to delete domain/Account
While deleting the UserAccount Cleanup for the removed VMs/volumes are not
happening. For the removed VMs, snapshots doesn't get cleaned.
GitHub user SudharmaJain opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1736
CLOUDSTACK-9562 Linux Guest VM get wrong default route when there areâ¦
⦠multiple Nic
REPRO STEPS
==
1. Log as admin, create a VM CentOSx64 integrate
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1718
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-104
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1719
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-105
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1717
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-103
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 125
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=102
Failed=3
Skipped=6
_Link to logs Folder
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1719
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos6 mgmt + xs65sp1, centos7 mgmt
+ vmware55u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1717
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos6 mgmt + xs65sp1, centos7 mgmt
+ vmware55u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1718
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos6 mgmt + xs65sp1, centos7 mgmt
+ vmware55u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1717
@blueorangutan test matrix
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1718
@blueorangutan test matrix
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1719
@blueorangutan test matrix
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
# Apache CloudStack Security Releases 4.8.1.1, 4.9.0.1
The Apache CloudStack project announces security releases 4.8.1.1, 4.9.0.1
that fixes the bug causing vulnerability over previously released minor
versions 4.8.1 and 4.9.0 respectively. As a security release, no new
features are included but
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1718
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-101
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1719
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-102
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1717
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-100
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1717
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1717
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1719
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1718
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1718
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1719
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1729
Trillian test result (tid-194)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 6
Total time taken: 35338 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
Trillian test result (tid-195)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 26462 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872
Tomorrow I will pick a recommended S2S VPN configuration and verify the
rest of the different possible options with that single configuration to give a
better global picture of the state of this
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872
I wrote a small testing setup which allows me to automate the build up and
tear down different configurations in test environment.
Here are the results so far of my branch (hopefully soon
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
@karuturi Anything else @syed needs to do for this one? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 124
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=98
Failed=4
Skipped=6
_Link to logs Folder
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872
@jayapalu I am not sure why, but I can't seem to do a pull request against
your branch. Any ideas why? Maybe you have some specific permissions on your
repo to stop this? If you are not sure, I
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
@syed +1 -- I would like to see a full component test run for this PR on XS
7 and smoke tests for XS 6.5. Also, we might want to consider a PR for 4.9 and
then another PR for master like we
Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
@jburwell Got it. I want to stabilize the tests and once everything looks
green here. I will open a PR against 4.9
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
@murali-reddy a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has
been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user murali-reddy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-99
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
@syed given that XenServer 6.5 doesn't run on newer hardware, XenServer
users don't have a realistic LTS release. Therefore, I propose that this PR be
targeted to the 4.9 branch and forward
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
@murali-reddy a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep
you posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user murali-reddy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
GitHub user nvazquez opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1735
CLOUDSTACK-9570: Bug in listSnapshots for snapshots with deleted data stores
## Actual behaviour
If there is snapshot on a data store that is removed, `listSnapshots` still
tries to
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1729
Trillian test result (tid-188)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 6
Total time taken: 36442 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
@rhtyd @PaulAngus I will verify the failed tests (except VPC and private
gateway) and update this. It would be nice if we can get this into 4.10
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
Trillian test result (tid-192)
Environment: CUSTOM-XenServer (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 6
Total time taken: 35929 seconds
Marvin logs:
All,
Now that we're getting some testing momentum going, I was thinking that we need
a way to categorise and prioritise the PR queue.
There are a limited number of labels available for use to apply to the PRs
within Github as it is, but we could go through and highlight bug fixes and
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1729
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos6 mgmt + vmware-55u3) has been
kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1729
@blueorangutan test centos6 vmware-55u3
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
Trillian test result (tid-193)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 25817 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
Trillian test result (tid-191)
Environment: vmware-60u2 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 30139 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 123
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=102
Failed=3
Skipped=6
_Link to logs Folder
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1727
@ustcweizhou @koushik-das thanks for your review! I refactored based on
your comments and tested everything is working as expected.
To test new marvin test introduced in
Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
LGTM as well
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
So my JS skills are way to low, but I tried this, but it doesn't seem to work:
$.validator.addMethod("ipv46cidr", function(value, element) {
if (!$.validator.methods.ipv4cidr.call(this, value, element) |
!$.validator.methods.ipv6cidr.call(this, value, element))
return false;
GitHub user SudharmaJain opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1734
CLOUDSTACK-9567 Difference in the api call outputs for CAPACITY_TYPE_â¦
â¦CPU = 1
The total capacity reported listPods and listCapacity is different, ideally
they have to be
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
Trillian test result (tid-183)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 6
Total time taken: 32182 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user ustcweizhou commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1726#discussion_r85108024
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/StorageManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -2199,15 +2199,20 @@ public void cleanupDownloadUrls(){
GitHub user SudharmaJain opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1733
CLOUDSTACK-9563 ExtractTemplate returns malformed URL after migratingâ¦
⦠NFS to s3
While downloading the template for the first time install path was not
available. During
So after some investigation I've found out that qemu 2.3.0 is indeed
broken, at least the way CS uses the qemu chardev/socket.
Not sure in which specific version it happened, but it was fixed in
2.4.0-rc3, specifically noting that CloudStack 4.2 was not working.
qemu git commit:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1729
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-98
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1586
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 122
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=101
Failed=3
Skipped=5
_Link to logs Folder
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
@karuturi a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been
kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user PaulAngus closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1650
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user PaulAngus closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1688
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1728
LGTM both test results (failures were intermittent issues and can be
ignored) and code changes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1731
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1731
On basis of Travis result, manual test run and code reviews, I'm going
ahead and merging this to avoid intermittent failures in upcoming tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user murali-reddy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1731
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1729
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-97
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job ((this mgmt + is) has been kicked to run
smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
@blueorangutan test
(this is to run a regression testing round)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-96
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1729
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1729
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1604
@murali-reddy can you help review this one?
@romain-dartigues thanks, can you also squash your commits to a single
commit, and amend the git commit message to reflect the JIRA ID in the
Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1731
@LGTM on code review @rhtyd
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
All changes are restricted to the solidfire plugin and currently we don't
have infra/tests to run them in a general env so considering Mike's tests, LGTM.
@blueorangutan package
---
If your
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1731
Test seems to be passing now:
=== TestName: test_oobm_zchange_password | Status : SUCCESS ===
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1731
Jenkins failure was due to git pull issue, not the PR changes. Pinging for
quick review/merge -- @abhinandanprateek @murali-reddy @karuturi @koushik-das
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user romain-dartigues commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1604
@rhtyd < JIRA issue
[#9568](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9568)
I'll rebase as soon as possible.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
TestVolumes.py (no resigning)
test_00_check_template_cache (TestVolumes.TestVolumes) ... === TestName:
test_00_check_template_cache | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach a
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
TestVolumes (resigning)
test_00_check_template_cache (TestVolumes.TestVolumes) ... === TestName:
test_00_check_template_cache | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach a volume to
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
TestVMSnapshots.py
test_01_take_VM_snapshot (TestVMSnapshots.TestVMSnapshots) ... ===
TestName: test_01_take_VM_snapshot | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
TestVMMigrationWithStorage
test_01_storage_migrate_root_and_data_disks
(TestVMMigrationWithStorage.TestVMMigrationWithStorage) ... === TestName:
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
TestSnapshots.py: The failure in test 04 makes sense as that test case is
actually dependent upon #1600, which has not yet been merged in.
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
TestAddRemoveHosts.py
test_add_remove_host_with_solidfire_plugin_1
(TestAddRemoveHosts.TestAddRemoveHosts) ... === TestName:
test_add_remove_host_with_solidfire_plugin_1 |
GitHub user mike-tutkowski opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
Switched to the official SolidFire SDK for Java
SolidFire has recently released an official SDK for Java.
I have converted the SolidFire storage plug-ins to make use of this new
87 matches
Mail list logo
