date:20161207

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1794: added more guest os

2016-12-07 Thread sateesh-chodapuneedi

Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1794#discussion_r91453705
  
--- Diff: setup/db/db/schema-4910to41000.sql ---
@@ -45,4 +45,48 @@ CREATE TABLE `cloud`.`vlan_details` (
   `display` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT 1 COMMENT 'Should detail be 
displayed to the end user',
   PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
   CONSTRAINT `fk_vlan_details__vlan_id` FOREIGN KEY 
`fk_vlan_details__vlan_id`(`vlan_id`) REFERENCES `vlan`(`id`) ON DELETE CASCADE
-) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;
\ No newline at end of file
+) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;
+
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os` (id, uuid, category_id, 
display_name, created) VALUES (261, UUID(), 1, 'CentOS 6.6 (32-bit)', now());
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os` (id, uuid, category_id, 
display_name, created) VALUES (262, UUID(), 1, 'CentOS 6.6 (64-bit)', now());
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os` (id, uuid, category_id, 
display_name, created) VALUES (263, UUID(), 1, 'CentOS 6.7 (32-bit)', now());
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os` (id, uuid, category_id, 
display_name, created) VALUES (264, UUID(), 1, 'CentOS 6.7 (64-bit)', now());
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type, 
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created, is_user_defined) 
VALUES (UUID(),'Xenserver', '6.5.0', 'CentOS 6 (32-bit)', 261, now(), 0);
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type, 
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created, is_user_defined) 
VALUES (UUID(),'Xenserver', '6.5.0', 'CentOS 6 (32-bit)', 263, now(), 0);
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type, 
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created, is_user_defined) 
VALUES (UUID(),'VMware', '6.0', 'centosGuest', 261, now(), 0);
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type, 
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created, is_user_defined) 
VALUES (UUID(),'VMware', '6.0', 'centosGuest', 263, now(), 0);
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type, 
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created, is_user_defined) 
VALUES (UUID(),'Xenserver', '6.5.0', 'CentOS 6 (64-bit)', 264, now(), 0);
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type, 
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created, is_user_defined) 
VALUES (UUID(),'Xenserver', '6.5.0', 'CentOS 6 (64-bit)', 262, now(), 0);
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type, 
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created, is_user_defined) 
VALUES (UUID(),'VMware', '6.0', 'centos64Guest', 264, now(), 0);
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type, 
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created, is_user_defined) 
VALUES (UUID(),'VMware', '6.0', 'centos64Guest', 262, now(), 0);
+
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os` (id, uuid, category_id, 
display_name, created) VALUES (265, UUID(), 4, 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.6 
(32-bit)', now());
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os` (id, uuid, category_id, 
display_name, created) VALUES (266, UUID(), 4, 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.6 
(64-bit)', now());
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os` (id, uuid, category_id, 
display_name, created) VALUES (267, UUID(), 4, 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.7 
(32-bit)', now());
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os` (id, uuid, category_id, 
display_name, created) VALUES (268, UUID(), 4, 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.7 
(64-bit)', now());
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type, 
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created, is_user_defined) 
VALUES (UUID(),'Xenserver', '6.5.0', 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 (32-bit)', 
265, now(), 0);
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type, 
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created, is_user_defined) 
VALUES (UUID(),'Xenserver', '6.5.0', 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 (32-bit)', 
267, now(), 0);
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type, 
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created, is_user_defined) 
VALUES (UUID(),'VMware', '6.0', 'rhel6Guest', 265, now(), 0);
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type, 
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created, is_user_defined) 
VALUES (UUID(),'VMware', '6.0', 'rhel6Guest', 267, now(), 0);
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type, 
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created, is_user_defined) 
VALUES (UUID(),'Xenserver', '6.5.0', 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 (64-bit)', 
266, now(), 0);
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type, 
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created,

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1794: added more guest os

2016-12-07 Thread sateesh-chodapuneedi

Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1794#discussion_r91460891
  
--- Diff: setup/db/db/schema-4910to41000.sql ---
@@ -45,4 +45,48 @@ CREATE TABLE `cloud`.`vlan_details` (
   `display` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT 1 COMMENT 'Should detail be 
displayed to the end user',
   PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
   CONSTRAINT `fk_vlan_details__vlan_id` FOREIGN KEY 
`fk_vlan_details__vlan_id`(`vlan_id`) REFERENCES `vlan`(`id`) ON DELETE CASCADE
-) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;
\ No newline at end of file
+) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;
+
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os` (id, uuid, category_id, 
display_name, created) VALUES (261, UUID(), 1, 'CentOS 6.6 (32-bit)', now());
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os` (id, uuid, category_id, 
display_name, created) VALUES (262, UUID(), 1, 'CentOS 6.6 (64-bit)', now());
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os` (id, uuid, category_id, 
display_name, created) VALUES (263, UUID(), 1, 'CentOS 6.7 (32-bit)', now());
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os` (id, uuid, category_id, 
display_name, created) VALUES (264, UUID(), 1, 'CentOS 6.7 (64-bit)', now());
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type, 
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created, is_user_defined) 
VALUES (UUID(),'Xenserver', '6.5.0', 'CentOS 6 (32-bit)', 261, now(), 0);
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type, 
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created, is_user_defined) 
VALUES (UUID(),'Xenserver', '6.5.0', 'CentOS 6 (32-bit)', 263, now(), 0);
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type, 
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created, is_user_defined) 
VALUES (UUID(),'VMware', '6.0', 'centosGuest', 261, now(), 0);
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type, 
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created, is_user_defined) 
VALUES (UUID(),'VMware', '6.0', 'centosGuest', 263, now(), 0);
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type, 
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created, is_user_defined) 
VALUES (UUID(),'Xenserver', '6.5.0', 'CentOS 6 (64-bit)', 264, now(), 0);
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type, 
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created, is_user_defined) 
VALUES (UUID(),'Xenserver', '6.5.0', 'CentOS 6 (64-bit)', 262, now(), 0);
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type, 
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created, is_user_defined) 
VALUES (UUID(),'VMware', '6.0', 'centos64Guest', 264, now(), 0);
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type, 
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created, is_user_defined) 
VALUES (UUID(),'VMware', '6.0', 'centos64Guest', 262, now(), 0);
+
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os` (id, uuid, category_id, 
display_name, created) VALUES (265, UUID(), 4, 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.6 
(32-bit)', now());
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os` (id, uuid, category_id, 
display_name, created) VALUES (266, UUID(), 4, 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.6 
(64-bit)', now());
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os` (id, uuid, category_id, 
display_name, created) VALUES (267, UUID(), 4, 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.7 
(32-bit)', now());
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os` (id, uuid, category_id, 
display_name, created) VALUES (268, UUID(), 4, 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.7 
(64-bit)', now());
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type, 
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created, is_user_defined) 
VALUES (UUID(),'Xenserver', '6.5.0', 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 (32-bit)', 
265, now(), 0);
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type, 
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created, is_user_defined) 
VALUES (UUID(),'Xenserver', '6.5.0', 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 (32-bit)', 
267, now(), 0);
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type, 
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created, is_user_defined) 
VALUES (UUID(),'VMware', '6.0', 'rhel6Guest', 265, now(), 0);
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type, 
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created, is_user_defined) 
VALUES (UUID(),'VMware', '6.0', 'rhel6Guest', 267, now(), 0);
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type, 
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created, is_user_defined) 
VALUES (UUID(),'Xenserver', '6.5.0', 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 (64-bit)', 
266, now(), 0);
+INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type, 
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created,

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1817: CLOUDSTACK-9654 Missing hypervisor mapping of variou...

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1817
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-350


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1817: CLOUDSTACK-9654 Missing hypervisor mapping of variou...

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1817
  
@sateesh-chodapuneedi the issue is not timeout, but a failing component 
test in components/test_volumes. On local env, this issue is not reproducible. 
With Travis, this is happening intermittently but not all the time. I'll 
investigate this today/tomorrow.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1817: CLOUDSTACK-9654 Missing hypervisor mapping of variou...

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1817
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1817: CLOUDSTACK-9654 Missing hypervisor mapping of variou...

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1817
  
Thanks @sateesh-chodapuneedi 
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1817: CLOUDSTACK-9654 Missing hypervisor mapping of variou...

2016-12-07 Thread sateesh-chodapuneedi

Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1817
  
@rhtyd I see one travis script failed due to timeout. Remaining are all 
successful.
```
/home/travis/build.sh: line 151: 10405 Terminated  
travis_jigger $! $timeout $cmd
The command "travis_wait 40 ./tools/travis/script.sh ${TESTS}" exited with 
1.
```


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1753: [4.9] Latest health test run

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
  
Trillian test result (tid-610)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 34691 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1753-t610-vmware-55u3.zip
Test completed. 39 look ok, 9 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Failure` | 136.78 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | `Failure` | 1185.36 | 
test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Failure` | 420.91 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | `Failure` | 269.44 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
`Failure` | 349.68 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 435.82 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | `Failure` | 390.75 
| test_vpc_redundant.py
test_router_dhcphosts | `Failure` | 65.95 | test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 1689.72 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_03_vpc_privategw_restart_vpc_cleanup | `Failure` | 207.26 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 1337.33 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_isolate_network_password_server | `Failure` | 32.81 | 
test_password_server.py
test_02_internallb_roundrobin_1RVPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 | `Failure` | 631.34 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_internallb_roundrobin_1VPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 | `Failure` | 524.50 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 946.85 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | `Error` | 117.13 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Error` | 522.27 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | `Error` | 420.95 | test_ssvm.py
ContextSuite context=TestSnapshotRootDisk>:teardown | `Error` | 76.68 | 
test_snapshots.py
ContextSuite context=TestRouterDHCPHosts>:teardown | `Error` | 86.19 | 
test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_04_rvpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | `Error` | 574.39 
| test_internal_lb.py
test_03_vpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | `Error` | 378.38 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 171.82 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 31.41 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 55.56 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 105.30 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 15.23 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.29 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 64.31 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 428.71 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 275.19 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 229.25 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot | Success | 226.77 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 161.63 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 302.96 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.88 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.26 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 121.70 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.10 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 10.15 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 5.14 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 20.24 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 5.12 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 226.70 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.07 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 15.26 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.11 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.19 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 100.86 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 241.82 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 238.71 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 126.48 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 158.38 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 207.00 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.14 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.21 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success |

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1817: CLOUDSTACK-9654 Missing hypervisor mapping of variou...

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1817
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-349


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1819: CLOUDSTACK-9653 The system capacity was not getting ...

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1819
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-348


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1796: CLOUDSTACK-9626: Instance fails to start after unsuc...

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1796
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-347


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1794: added more guest os

2016-12-07 Thread sateesh-chodapuneedi

Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1794
  
@karuturi Can you please resolve the conflicts and rebase this branch?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1749: CLOUDSTACK-9619: Updates for SAN-assisted snapshots

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-346


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1800: CLOUDSTACK-9633:test_snapshot is failing due to inco...

2016-12-07 Thread abhinandanprateek

Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1800
  
@rhtyd this is good.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1749: CLOUDSTACK-9619: Updates for SAN-assisted snapshots

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
  
@mike-tutkowski thanks, I'll have another look at the PR. I'll kick some 
tests shortly.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1807: CLOUDSTACK-9633: Revert addition of `vhd` extention ...

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1807
  
Thanks @abhinandanprateek @syed 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1807: CLOUDSTACK-9633: Revert addition of `vhd` ext...

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1807


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1807: CLOUDSTACK-9633: Revert addition of `vhd` extention ...

2016-12-07 Thread abhinandanprateek

Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1807
  
@syed please do a check of various snapshot functions on a upgraded setup. 

@rhtyd this PR can be closed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1817: CLOUDSTACK-9654 Missing hypervisor mapping of variou...

2016-12-07 Thread sateesh-chodapuneedi

Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1817
  
@rhtyd Yes, rebased with latest 4.9, and did a force push to kick Travis 
checks.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1754: [4.10] Latest health test run

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
  
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos6 mgmt + xs65sp1, centos7 mgmt 
+ vmware55u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1754: [4.10] Latest health test run

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
  
@blueorangutan test matrix


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1817: CLOUDSTACK-9654 Missing hypervisor mapping of variou...

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1817
  
LGTM. Travis failure is due to timeout on one of the jobs, 
@sateesh-chodapuneedi can you push -f to rekick Travis.

@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1817: CLOUDSTACK-9654 Missing hypervisor mapping of variou...

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1817
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1818: CLOUDSTACK-9655 The template which is registe...

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1818#discussion_r91448021
  
--- Diff: ui/scripts/templates.js ---
@@ -1447,7 +1447,11 @@
  label: 
'label.action.delete.template',
  messages: {
  confirm: 
function(args) {
- return 
'message.action.delete.template';
+ 
if(args.context.templates[0].crossZones == true) {
+ return 'This 
is a cross zone template and will be deleted from all the zones. Are you sure 
you want to proceed?';
--- End diff --

@karuturi can you add this to a new dictionary, in messages.properties etc 
so this can be translated in other languages?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1819: CLOUDSTACK-9653 The system capacity was not getting ...

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1819
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1819: CLOUDSTACK-9653 The system capacity was not getting ...

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1819
  
LGTM.
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1810: CLOUDSTACK-9647: NIC adapter type becomes e1000 , ev...

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1810
  
Trillian test result (tid-609)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 30242 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1810-t609-kvm-centos7.zip
Test completed. 40 look ok, 8 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_02_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 918.70 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | `Failure` | 1024.81 | 
test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Failure` | 184.45 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | `Failure` | 118.30 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
`Failure` | 108.84 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 154.25 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | `Failure` | 144.10 
| test_vpc_redundant.py
test_router_dhcphosts | `Failure` | 63.01 | test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 1206.46 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_03_vpc_privategw_restart_vpc_cleanup | `Failure` | 1060.51 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 1045.67 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_isolate_network_password_server | `Failure` | 95.95 | 
test_password_server.py
test_02_internallb_roundrobin_1RVPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 | `Failure` | 353.55 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_internallb_roundrobin_1VPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 | `Failure` | 303.17 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 393.45 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 493.53 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Error` | 356.02 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_delete_template | `Error` | 5.09 | test_templates.py
ContextSuite context=TestRouterDHCPHosts>:teardown | `Error` | 108.41 | 
test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_04_rvpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | `Error` | 277.25 
| test_internal_lb.py
test_03_vpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | `Error` | 227.05 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 71.20 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 15.53 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 15.41 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 21.00 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 15.34 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.26 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.21 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.31 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 73.97 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 712.53 | test_volumes.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 252.98 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.80 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.23 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 40.96 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 125.83 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 125.83 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.18 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 40.32 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 95.78 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.20 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.18 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 65.57 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 166.75 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 193.93 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 101.57 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 133.56 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 131.74 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 134.13 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.20 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.42 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.12 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 11.23 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 240.27 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering |

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1749: CLOUDSTACK-9619: Updates for SAN-assisted snapshots

2016-12-07 Thread mike-tutkowski

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
  
@syed Would you be able to review this code when you have a little time? 
Thanks!


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1749: CLOUDSTACK-9619: Updates for SAN-assisted snapshots

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Status

2016-12-07 Thread Rohit Yadav

Hi Mike, yes I'll have a look.


Hi Patrick, thanks -- your PR is a bugfix and I'll have a look.


Regards.


From: Patrick Dube 
Sent: 08 December 2016 06:54:34
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Status

Hi Rohit,

Could we also add https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1820. It
prevents usage from working at all if you have a single project with usage.

Thanks,

P.

On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 7:33 PM, Tutkowski, Mike 
wrote:

> Hi Rohit,
>
> Can I get 1749 on the list for 4.10?
>
> Without it, there is a breakage in snapshots for managed storage (this PR
> fixes a couple issues from PR 1600).
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
> On 12/5/16, 4:09 AM, "Rohit Yadav"  wrote:
>
> All,
>
>
> We've several open PRs, I'll try to get some of them reviewed, tested
> and merged in next two days. Please help with reviewing and testing open
> PRs.
>
>
> To avoid further delaying starting RC/voting threads, after middle of
> the week we'll only consider PR that fix any blockers (a hard freeze
> announcement email will be shared). Following satisfactory test runs, I'll
> help start RC voting process.
>
>
> List of critical PRs:
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1763
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1807
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1799
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1579
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
>
>
> Thanks and regards.
>
> 
> From: Rohit Yadav 
> Sent: 27 November 2016 22:08:52
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Status
>
> All,
>
> We're closer to cutting RCs now, we've only two outstanding PRs from
> John's list and an additional fix critical for VR (#1659):
>
>   * 1579 (fix conflicts + commit squash; regression tests pending)
>   * 1765 (code review feedback + regression tests pending)
>   * 1659 (code review + regression tests pending)
>
> Of this list, PR 1579 is a new feature on master/4.10 and can be
> merged post 4.10.0.0 release and is not blocking the release work.
>
> I've merged few UI/translation related PRs today ahead of the 4.10.0.0
> release on master branch, and I've kicked tests for the 4.8[1], 4.9 [2] and
> master (4.10) [3] branches to evaluate current health of these branches.
>
> Regards.
>
> [1] 4.8: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
> [2] 4.9: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
> [3] 4.10/master: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
>
>
> 
> From: Rohit Yadav 
> Sent: 24 November 2016 12:24:00
> To: John Burwell; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Status
>
>
> All,
>
>
> We've managed to review/merge few PRs, but we still have five more to
> go after which we should be able to cut RCs. We've following PRs pending
> from previous list:
>
>
> * 4.10.0.0
>   * 1545 (code review comments; regression tests pending)
>   * 1577 (Jenkins failures; regression tests pending)
>   * 1579 (needs rebase + commit squash; regression tests pending)
>   * 1580 (needs rebase + commit squash; regression tests pending)
> * 4.8.2.0, 4.9.1.0, 4.10.0.0
>
> * 1765 (squash commits; code review feedback; regression tests
> pending)
>
> On 4.8 [1], 4.9 [2] most of the integration tests are passing with
> exception to certain intermittent failures on xenserver and vmware.
> On 4.10/master [3], some new errors related to volumes and snapshots
> were found on xenserver [3] and they are under investigation.
>
> In addition to the on-going effort to get all green on these smoke
> tests across 4.8, 4.9 and master branches, I've started looking into some
> component tests, especially identifying those that can be run against
> simulator and can added to Travis (and pass within 50 mins) [4]. As a
> general request, if you're writing a new integration test that can finish
> rather quickly (say less than 20 mins) please consider adding them to smoke
> tests.
>
> I would request your help in above PRs and other on-going QA efforts.
> Thanks everyone.
>
> Regards.
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
> [2] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
> [3] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
> [4] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1755
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> 
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
>

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1749: CLOUDSTACK-9619: Updates for SAN-assisted snapshots

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
  
/cc @abhinandanprateek 
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1820: CLOUDSTACK-9656 Preventing autoboxing NPE in Usage b...

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1820
  
LGTM. @pdube since this is a bugfix, can you rebase the PR against 4.9, and 
change PR's base branch to 4.9? Thanks.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1796: CLOUDSTACK-9626: Instance fails to start after unsuc...

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1796
  
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + vmware-55u3) has been 
kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1796: CLOUDSTACK-9626: Instance fails to start after unsuc...

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1796
  
@blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-55u3


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1753: [4.9] Latest health test run

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
  
Trillian test result (tid-608)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 29044 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1753-t608-kvm-centos7.zip
Test completed. 41 look ok, 7 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_02_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 942.89 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | `Failure` | 953.27 | 
test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Failure` | 117.82 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | `Failure` | 102.47 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
`Failure` | 92.31 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 143.27 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | `Failure` | 128.09 
| test_vpc_redundant.py
test_router_dhcphosts | `Failure` | 95.79 | test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 1154.68 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_03_vpc_privategw_restart_vpc_cleanup | `Failure` | 988.92 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 1014.04 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_isolate_network_password_server | `Failure` | 33.49 | 
test_password_server.py
test_02_internallb_roundrobin_1RVPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 | `Failure` | 317.34 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_internallb_roundrobin_1VPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 | `Failure` | 277.32 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 372.06 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 442.52 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Error` | 394.91 | test_vpc_redundant.py
ContextSuite context=TestRouterDHCPHosts>:teardown | `Error` | 146.15 | 
test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_04_rvpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | `Error` | 236.75 
| test_internal_lb.py
test_03_vpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | `Error` | 241.77 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 55.78 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 15.38 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 15.29 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 20.36 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 15.23 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.19 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.15 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.21 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 73.72 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 621.00 | test_volumes.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 267.00 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.57 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.21 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 40.64 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.08 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 125.92 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 125.66 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.12 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 40.24 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 90.62 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.02 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.13 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.08 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.16 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 35.30 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 161.34 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 163.58 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 101.19 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 133.55 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 131.32 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 163.75 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 0.97 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.40 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.08 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.09 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 10.99 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 234.36 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering |

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1707: CLOUDSTACK-9397: Add Watchdog timer to KVM Instance

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1707
  
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been 
kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1707: CLOUDSTACK-9397: Add Watchdog timer to KVM Instance

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1707
  
@blueorangutan test


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1770: CLOUDSTACK-9628: Fix Template Size in Swift as Secon...

2016-12-07 Thread syed

Github user syed commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1770
  
Sorry @jburwell I just saw this now. Yes this is specific to Swift users 
only. I will rebase it against 4.9 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Status

2016-12-07 Thread Patrick Dube

Hi Rohit,

Could we also add https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1820. It
prevents usage from working at all if you have a single project with usage.

Thanks,

P.

On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 7:33 PM, Tutkowski, Mike 
wrote:

> Hi Rohit,
>
> Can I get 1749 on the list for 4.10?
>
> Without it, there is a breakage in snapshots for managed storage (this PR
> fixes a couple issues from PR 1600).
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
> On 12/5/16, 4:09 AM, "Rohit Yadav"  wrote:
>
> All,
>
>
> We've several open PRs, I'll try to get some of them reviewed, tested
> and merged in next two days. Please help with reviewing and testing open
> PRs.
>
>
> To avoid further delaying starting RC/voting threads, after middle of
> the week we'll only consider PR that fix any blockers (a hard freeze
> announcement email will be shared). Following satisfactory test runs, I'll
> help start RC voting process.
>
>
> List of critical PRs:
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1763
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1807
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1799
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1579
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
>
>
> Thanks and regards.
>
> 
> From: Rohit Yadav 
> Sent: 27 November 2016 22:08:52
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Status
>
> All,
>
> We're closer to cutting RCs now, we've only two outstanding PRs from
> John's list and an additional fix critical for VR (#1659):
>
>   * 1579 (fix conflicts + commit squash; regression tests pending)
>   * 1765 (code review feedback + regression tests pending)
>   * 1659 (code review + regression tests pending)
>
> Of this list, PR 1579 is a new feature on master/4.10 and can be
> merged post 4.10.0.0 release and is not blocking the release work.
>
> I've merged few UI/translation related PRs today ahead of the 4.10.0.0
> release on master branch, and I've kicked tests for the 4.8[1], 4.9 [2] and
> master (4.10) [3] branches to evaluate current health of these branches.
>
> Regards.
>
> [1] 4.8: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
> [2] 4.9: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
> [3] 4.10/master: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
>
>
> 
> From: Rohit Yadav 
> Sent: 24 November 2016 12:24:00
> To: John Burwell; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Status
>
>
> All,
>
>
> We've managed to review/merge few PRs, but we still have five more to
> go after which we should be able to cut RCs. We've following PRs pending
> from previous list:
>
>
> * 4.10.0.0
>   * 1545 (code review comments; regression tests pending)
>   * 1577 (Jenkins failures; regression tests pending)
>   * 1579 (needs rebase + commit squash; regression tests pending)
>   * 1580 (needs rebase + commit squash; regression tests pending)
> * 4.8.2.0, 4.9.1.0, 4.10.0.0
>
> * 1765 (squash commits; code review feedback; regression tests
> pending)
>
> On 4.8 [1], 4.9 [2] most of the integration tests are passing with
> exception to certain intermittent failures on xenserver and vmware.
> On 4.10/master [3], some new errors related to volumes and snapshots
> were found on xenserver [3] and they are under investigation.
>
> In addition to the on-going effort to get all green on these smoke
> tests across 4.8, 4.9 and master branches, I've started looking into some
> component tests, especially identifying those that can be run against
> simulator and can added to Travis (and pass within 50 mins) [4]. As a
> general request, if you're writing a new integration test that can finish
> rather quickly (say less than 20 mins) please consider adding them to smoke
> tests.
>
> I would request your help in above PRs and other on-going QA efforts.
> Thanks everyone.
>
> Regards.
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
> [2] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
> [3] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
> [4] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1755
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> 
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
> From: John Burwell
> Sent: 17 November 2016 11:53:33
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Rohit Yadav
> Subject: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Status

Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Status

2016-12-07 Thread Tutkowski, Mike

Hi Rohit,

Can I get 1749 on the list for 4.10?

Without it, there is a breakage in snapshots for managed storage (this PR fixes 
a couple issues from PR 1600).

Thanks,
Mike

On 12/5/16, 4:09 AM, "Rohit Yadav"  wrote:

All,


We've several open PRs, I'll try to get some of them reviewed, tested and 
merged in next two days. Please help with reviewing and testing open PRs.


To avoid further delaying starting RC/voting threads, after middle of the 
week we'll only consider PR that fix any blockers (a hard freeze announcement 
email will be shared). Following satisfactory test runs, I'll help start RC 
voting process.


List of critical PRs:


https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1763

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1807

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1799

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1579

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659


Thanks and regards.


From: Rohit Yadav 
Sent: 27 November 2016 22:08:52
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Status

All,

We're closer to cutting RCs now, we've only two outstanding PRs from John's 
list and an additional fix critical for VR (#1659):

  * 1579 (fix conflicts + commit squash; regression tests pending)
  * 1765 (code review feedback + regression tests pending)
  * 1659 (code review + regression tests pending)

Of this list, PR 1579 is a new feature on master/4.10 and can be merged 
post 4.10.0.0 release and is not blocking the release work.

I've merged few UI/translation related PRs today ahead of the 4.10.0.0 
release on master branch, and I've kicked tests for the 4.8[1], 4.9 [2] and 
master (4.10) [3] branches to evaluate current health of these branches.

Regards.

[1] 4.8: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
[2] 4.9: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
[3] 4.10/master: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754



From: Rohit Yadav 
Sent: 24 November 2016 12:24:00
To: John Burwell; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Status


All,


We've managed to review/merge few PRs, but we still have five more to go 
after which we should be able to cut RCs. We've following PRs pending from 
previous list:


* 4.10.0.0
  * 1545 (code review comments; regression tests pending)
  * 1577 (Jenkins failures; regression tests pending)
  * 1579 (needs rebase + commit squash; regression tests pending)
  * 1580 (needs rebase + commit squash; regression tests pending)
* 4.8.2.0, 4.9.1.0, 4.10.0.0

* 1765 (squash commits; code review feedback; regression tests 
pending)

On 4.8 [1], 4.9 [2] most of the integration tests are passing with 
exception to certain intermittent failures on xenserver and vmware.
On 4.10/master [3], some new errors related to volumes and snapshots were 
found on xenserver [3] and they are under investigation.

In addition to the on-going effort to get all green on these smoke tests 
across 4.8, 4.9 and master branches, I've started looking into some component 
tests, especially identifying those that can be run against simulator and can 
added to Travis (and pass within 50 mins) [4]. As a general request, if you're 
writing a new integration test that can finish rather quickly (say less than 20 
mins) please consider adding them to smoke tests.

I would request your help in above PRs and other on-going QA efforts. 
Thanks everyone.

Regards.

[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
[2] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
[3] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
[4] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1755

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
@shapeblue






rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

From: John Burwell
Sent: 17 November 2016 11:53:33
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Rohit Yadav
Subject: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Status

All,

I apologize for being relatively radio silent.  We have mage good progress 
towards getting RCs out for 4.8.2.0, 4.9.1.0, and 4.10.0.0.  On 31 October 
2016, we 17 outstanding PRs to be merged.  As of today (17 Nov 2016), we have 9 
PRs to merge with

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1754: [4.10] Latest health test run

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-343


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1707: CLOUDSTACK-9397: Add Watchdog timer to KVM Instance

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1707
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-342


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1796: CLOUDSTACK-9626: Instance fails to start after unsuc...

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1796
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-345


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1752: [4.8] Latest health test run

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-344


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1810: CLOUDSTACK-9647: NIC adapter type becomes e1000 , ev...

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1810
  
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been 
kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1810: CLOUDSTACK-9647: NIC adapter type becomes e1000 , ev...

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1810
  
@blueorangutan test


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1810: CLOUDSTACK-9647: NIC adapter type becomes e1000 , ev...

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1810
  
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + vmware-55u3) has been 
kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1796: CLOUDSTACK-9626: Instance fails to start after unsuc...

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1796
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1810: CLOUDSTACK-9647: NIC adapter type becomes e1000 , ev...

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1810
  
@blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-55u3



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1754: [4.10] Latest health test run

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1796: CLOUDSTACK-9626: Instance fails to start after unsuc...

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1796
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1707: CLOUDSTACK-9397: Add Watchdog timer to KVM Instance

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1707
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1753: [4.9] Latest health test run

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
  
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos6 mgmt + xs65sp1, centos7 mgmt 
+ vmware55u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1707: CLOUDSTACK-9397: Add Watchdog timer to KVM Instance

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1707
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1752: [4.8] Latest health test run

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1752: [4.8] Latest health test run

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1754: [4.10] Latest health test run

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1753: [4.9] Latest health test run

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
  
@blueorangutan test matrix


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1753: [4.9] Latest health test run

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-340


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1754: [4.10] Latest health test run

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-341


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1752: [4.8] Latest health test run

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-339


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1795: CLOUDSTACK-9625:Unable to scale VM from any offering...

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1795
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-338


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1707: CLOUDSTACK-9397: Add Watchdog timer to KVM Instance

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1707
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-337


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1820: CLOUDSTACK-9656 Preventing autoboxing NPE in Usage b...

2016-12-07 Thread syed

Github user syed commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1820
  
LGTM :+1: 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1810: CLOUDSTACK-9647: NIC adapter type becomes e1000 , ev...

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1810
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-335


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1796: CLOUDSTACK-9626: Instance fails to start after unsuc...

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1796
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-336


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1741: Updated StrongSwan VPN Implementation

2016-12-07 Thread swill

Github user swill commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
  
@jayapalu were you working off the latest version of my PR?  I have fixed 
the issue of the IP being out of order on reboot in this PR.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1741: Updated StrongSwan VPN Implementation

2016-12-07 Thread swill

Github user swill commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
  
Rebased again because changes in #1659 caused the fixes to 
`systemvm/patches/debian/config/opt/cloud/bin/cs_ip.py` to conflict...


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1820: CLOUDSTACK-9656 Preventing autoboxing NPE in ...

2016-12-07 Thread pdube

GitHub user pdube opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1820

CLOUDSTACK-9656 Preventing autoboxing NPE in Usage by setting a default 
role when not found

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9656

This is a workaround to avoid NPE when using the usage server with Projects

To reproduce bug:

Create project
Add account to project
Create VM within that project
Run the usage server

Same steps to test resolution

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/pdube/cloudstack 
CLOUDSTACK-9656-usage-exception

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1820.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1820






---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1707: CLOUDSTACK-9397: Add Watchdog timer to KVM Instance

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1707
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1795: CLOUDSTACK-9625:Unable to scale VM from any offering...

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1795
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1707: CLOUDSTACK-9397: Add Watchdog timer to KVM Instance

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1707
  
Thanks @wido I'll kick some tests
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1772: CLOUDSTACK-9627 Fix template sync for region ...

2016-12-07 Thread asfgit

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1772


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1795: CLOUDSTACK-9625:Unable to scale VM from any offering...

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1795
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1579: CLOUDSTACK-9403 : Support for shared networks in Nua...

2016-12-07 Thread prashanthvarma

Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1579
  
Thank you all for helping us in merging this PR, much appreciated !!


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1772: CLOUDSTACK-9627 Fix template sync for region store.

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1772
  
LGTM, tests and review LGTM (one failing VPC/rvr is known intermittent 
failure and can be ignored). Merging this now. Thanks @syed 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1796: CLOUDSTACK-9626: Instance fails to start after unsuc...

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1796
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1796: CLOUDSTACK-9626: Instance fails to start after unsuc...

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1796
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1618: [CLOUDSTACK-9643] Now returning os info with the lis...

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1618
  
LGTM, the failure in Travis is caused by env issue and not the PR itself. 
Merging this based on review, and test results.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1622: [CLOUDSTACK-9644] Adding missing bits field t...

2016-12-07 Thread asfgit

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: [CLOUDSTACK-9644] Adding missing bits field to Templ...

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
  
LGTM, Travis/Jenkins failure is not caused by this. Validated build, and 
Trillian tests. Merging this now.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1566: [CLOUDSTACK-9645] Followup fix for #1162: Add...

2016-12-07 Thread asfgit

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1566


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1566: [CLOUDSTACK-9645] Followup fix for #1162: Add suppor...

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1566
  
LGTM, merging this. Travis failure is not due to this PR.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1809: CLOUDSTACK-9646: No usage is generated for up...

2016-12-07 Thread asfgit

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1809


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1810: CLOUDSTACK-9647: NIC adapter type becomes e1000 , ev...

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1810
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1810: CLOUDSTACK-9647: NIC adapter type becomes e1000 , ev...

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1810
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1809: CLOUDSTACK-9646: No usage is generated for uploaded ...

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1809
  
LGTM, merging this.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1752: [4.8] Latest health test run

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1753: [4.9] Latest health test run

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1754: [4.10] Latest health test run

2016-12-07 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1753: [4.9] Latest health test run

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1754: [4.10] Latest health test run

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1752: [4.8] Latest health test run

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Status

2016-12-07 Thread Rohit Yadav

All,


We've now only following PRs blocking the release process to be started:


https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1763
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1807


Along with these two PRs, we'll triage several outstanding bugfix PRs that have 
been tested and reviewed and can be merged. Following this, we'll work towards 
stabilizing the branches and then start the release process. Thank you all for 
submitting, reviewing and testing the PRs.


Regards.


From: Rohit Yadav 
Sent: 05 December 2016 16:39:39
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Status

All,


We've several open PRs, I'll try to get some of them reviewed, tested and 
merged in next two days. Please help with reviewing and testing open PRs.


To avoid further delaying starting RC/voting threads, after middle of the week 
we'll only consider PR that fix any blockers (a hard freeze announcement email 
will be shared). Following satisfactory test runs, I'll help start RC voting 
process.


List of critical PRs:


https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1763

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1807

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1799

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1579

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659


Thanks and regards.


From: Rohit Yadav 
Sent: 27 November 2016 22:08:52
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Status

All,

We're closer to cutting RCs now, we've only two outstanding PRs from John's 
list and an additional fix critical for VR (#1659):

  * 1579 (fix conflicts + commit squash; regression tests pending)
  * 1765 (code review feedback + regression tests pending)
  * 1659 (code review + regression tests pending)

Of this list, PR 1579 is a new feature on master/4.10 and can be merged post 
4.10.0.0 release and is not blocking the release work.

I've merged few UI/translation related PRs today ahead of the 4.10.0.0 release 
on master branch, and I've kicked tests for the 4.8[1], 4.9 [2] and master 
(4.10) [3] branches to evaluate current health of these branches.

Regards.

[1] 4.8: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
[2] 4.9: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
[3] 4.10/master: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754



From: Rohit Yadav 
Sent: 24 November 2016 12:24:00
To: John Burwell; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Status


All,


We've managed to review/merge few PRs, but we still have five more to go after 
which we should be able to cut RCs. We've following PRs pending from previous 
list:


* 4.10.0.0
  * 1545 (code review comments; regression tests pending)
  * 1577 (Jenkins failures; regression tests pending)
  * 1579 (needs rebase + commit squash; regression tests pending)
  * 1580 (needs rebase + commit squash; regression tests pending)
* 4.8.2.0, 4.9.1.0, 4.10.0.0

* 1765 (squash commits; code review feedback; regression tests pending)

On 4.8 [1], 4.9 [2] most of the integration tests are passing with exception to 
certain intermittent failures on xenserver and vmware.
On 4.10/master [3], some new errors related to volumes and snapshots were found 
on xenserver [3] and they are under investigation.

In addition to the on-going effort to get all green on these smoke tests across 
4.8, 4.9 and master branches, I've started looking into some component tests, 
especially identifying those that can be run against simulator and can added to 
Travis (and pass within 50 mins) [4]. As a general request, if you're writing a 
new integration test that can finish rather quickly (say less than 20 mins) 
please consider adding them to smoke tests.

I would request your help in above PRs and other on-going QA efforts. Thanks 
everyone.

Regards.

[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
[2] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
[3] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
[4] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1755

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
@shapeblue






rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

From: John Burwell
Sent: 17 November 2016 11:53:33
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Rohit Yadav
Subject: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Status

All,

I apologize for being relatively radio silent.  We have mage good progress 
towards getting RCs out for 4.8.2.0, 4.9.1.0, and 4.10.0.0.  On 31 October 
2016, we 17 outstanding

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1799: CLOUDSTACK-9632: Upgrade bouncy castle to ver...

2016-12-07 Thread asfgit

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1799


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1659: CLOUDSTACK-9339 Virtual Routers don't handle ...

2016-12-07 Thread asfgit

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1579: CLOUDSTACK-9403 : Support for shared networks...

2016-12-07 Thread asfgit

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1579


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1763: CLOUDSTACK-9594: API "list templates templatefilter=...

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1763
  
@sudhansu7 can you squash your changes, include information about the 
partial revert in the commit message?
@murali-reddy can you help review this as well, thanks.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1579: CLOUDSTACK-9403 : Support for shared networks in Nua...

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1579
  
@jburwell @murali-reddy I'll work on the Travis issue separately, this is 
an intermittent issue with Travis/simulator. The only failing test is 
`test_create_volume_under_domain` in components/test_volumes.py. In our recent 
component tests run, out of 1000s of tests some 800 have passed (to give you a 
ballpark figure); after blocking PRs are merged, we'll work towards fixing 
tests/code to get all green on the branches.

Given the effort invested in this PR with respect to testing and reviewing, 
we've enough LGTMs. I'll proceed with merging this now. Thank you everyone 
involved.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1659: CLOUDSTACK-9339 Virtual Routers don't handle Multipl...

2016-12-07 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
  
Travis failure is to do with a test_volumes failures in one of the 
component tests, not related to this PR. Will merge, and handle the Travis 
failure separately.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

1 2 >

1 - 100 of 132 matches

Mail list logo