Re: 4.9 / 4.10 KVM + openvswitch + vpc + static nat / secondary ip on eth2?

Hi Frank, Great analysis, but what can we do now? Is there a workaround or who can fix this? Greetings Sven Am 31.10.2017 um 22:41 schrieb Frank Maximus >: That seems to be a bug in the lookup of the device number,

Re: 4.9 / 4.10 KVM + openvswitch + vpc + static nat / secondary ip on eth2?

That seems to be a bug in the lookup of the device number, in case of openvswitch. The config clearly sets device to eth2, while it should be eth1. More specifically: in LibvirtComputingResource.prepareNetworkElementCommand() The broadcastUriToNicNum map is filled depending on the VR nics. In

Re: 4.9 / 4.10 KVM + openvswitch + vpc + static nat / secondary ip on eth2?

Hi Frank, root@r-29-VM:~# cat /etc/cloudstack/ips.json { "eth0": [ { "add": true, "broadcast": "169.254.255.255", "cidr": "169.254.3.129/16", "device": "eth0", "gateway": "None", "netmask": "255.255.0.0", "network": "169.254.0.0/16",

Re: 4.9 / 4.10 KVM + openvswitch + vpc + static nat / secondary ip on eth2?

I think that the bug you mentioned might not be related. Could you please send the content of the file /etc/cloudstack/ips.json on the VR. That might provide useful information. Kind regards, Frank On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 15:23 Vogel, Sven, wrote: > Hi Devs, > > i

Re: Strange size of template from snapshot on XenServer

Yes, it is a big problem. I have not checked the code that creates the template, but I am not sure if the problem you are experiencing is related to 9025. It might be a problem in some other place. My suggestion is for you to create a Jira ticket detailing the situation and wait until someone

RE: Strange size of template from snapshot on XenServer

I tested on a fresh environment, acs 4.9.3.0, xenserver 6.5 with all patches and primary storage NFS, we have same problem - Snapshot files [root@acs01 203]# ls -lh /exports/secondary/snapshots/2/6/ total 2.8G -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.7G Oct 31 16:48 cad96f0c-de49-4255-b0a0-9aea5e2297cb.vhd <--

HTTPS LB and x-forwarded-for

Hello, Of the people running an LB (VR) with https backends, how do you deal with the lack of x-forwarded-for since for port 443 there's just simple TCP balancing? Has anyone thought of terminating SSL in the VR instead? Ideas? Cheers -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

4.9 / 4.10 KVM + openvswitch + vpc + static nat / secondary ip on eth2?

Hi Devs, i have the following problem. When I look this jira ticket I see no solution. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6801 but I think the problem is not solved correctly. 1. KVM 2. Bridges bond with two interfaces and trunk (0,129,180,100-1500) to cloudbr0

CloudStack 4.10 Ubuntu on 16.04 is broken

Hi, Devs. ACS 4.10 run on ubuntu 16.04 fails with окт 31 17:20:07 cs2-head1 jsvc.exec[12114]: окт 31, 2017 5:20:07 PM org.apache.catalina.startup.ClassLoaderFactory validateFile WARNING: Problem with directory [/usr/share/cloudstack-mysql-ha/lib],